Efficiency of public passenger transport by rail in larger cities: European biased perspective

Transportation in larger cities is getting more important due to the reason of increasing population in cities and tightening global environmental demands. Besides pedestrian and biking alternatives, rail-based public transportation systems represent environmentally sustainable alternative to respond on these concerns. In this research work we analyse through four different efficiency measurement models (used space or service) 52 larger cities around the world concerning the rail-based public passenger transportation system. Findings indicate that very large cities are not necessarily most efficient in running public transportation system, and typically the highest performance is present in medium sized cities of evaluated database, and they are located in Central Europe. We find in this study that very large population and high urban population concentration represent the causes for low efficiency in mega-cities, among not particularly high or either exceptional usage of rail-based passenger transportation.

[1]  Lin Liu,et al.  Performance evaluation of bus lines with data envelopment analysis and geographic information systems , 2009, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[2]  Tom Thomas,et al.  Variations in urban traffic volumes , 2008 .

[3]  G. C. De Jong,et al.  The Driving Factors of Passenger Transport , 2008 .

[4]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Comparison of Capital Costs per Route-Kilometre in Urban Rail , 2008, 1303.6569.

[5]  G. Maggio,et al.  A variant of the Hubbert curve for world oil production forecasts , 2009 .

[6]  T. Lyons,et al.  Understanding and predicting private motorised urban mobility , 2003 .

[7]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Trends in Vehicle Kilometres of Travel in World Cities, 1960-1990: Underlying Drivers and Policy Responses. , 2004 .

[8]  Kevin Cullinane,et al.  The impact of governance development models on urban rail efficiency , 2008 .

[9]  Xiaojun Hu,et al.  Energy for sustainable road transportation in China: Challenges, initiatives and policy implications , 2010 .

[10]  Dawna L. Rhoades,et al.  Imperfect substitutes: competitive analysis failure in US intercity passenger rail , 2006 .

[11]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[12]  Cesare Marchetti,et al.  The Evolution of Transport , 2001 .

[13]  J. Cowie,et al.  THE TECHNICAL EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OWNERSHIP IN THE RAIL INDUSTRY. THE CASE OF SWISS PRIVATE RAILWAYS , 1999 .

[14]  Zhaoqiong Qin Improving public transit access to in-city villages , 2008, Int. J. Data Anal. Tech. Strateg..

[15]  Daniel Albalate,et al.  What shapes local public transportation in Europe? Economics, Mobility, Institutions, and Geography , 2010 .

[16]  R. Noland,et al.  Estimating the Effect of Urban Density on Fuel Demand , 2009 .

[17]  Jonathan Cowie,et al.  Organisation form, scale effects and efficiency in the British bus industry , 1999 .

[18]  Wolfgang Grimme Air/rail passenger intermodality concepts in Germany , 2007 .

[19]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[20]  James Odeck,et al.  The effect of mergers on efficiency and productivity of public transport services , 2008 .

[21]  Paul Amos,et al.  Railways in Development : Global Round-Up 1996-2005 , 2007 .

[22]  Olli-Pekka Hilmola,et al.  Evaluating light rail as a short distance passenger transportation solution in a midsized town , 2010 .

[23]  M. Sadiq Sohail,et al.  Measuring Service Quality at King Fahd International Airport , 2005, Int. J. Serv. Stand..

[24]  Jeffrey Kenworthy TRAFFIC 2042: A MORE GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE , 2002 .

[25]  Peter D. DeVries Airline passenger information systems and process improvements , 2009, Int. J. Serv. Stand..