Potential Problems with Peer Ratings
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. J. Bernardin,et al. The Effect of Reciprocal Leniency on the Relationship Between Consideration Scores from the LBDQ and Performance Ratings. , 1980 .
[2] A. Brief. Peer assessment revisited: A brief comment on Kane and Lawler. , 1980 .
[3] Robert D. Pritchard,et al. Implicit theories of performance as artifacts in survey research: A replication and extension☆ , 1978 .
[4] Jeffrey S. Kane,et al. Methods of peer assessment. , 1978 .
[5] C. H. Castore,et al. A Longitudinal Field Investigation of the Impact of Group Composition on Group Performance and Cohesion. , 1976 .
[6] R. Mclean,et al. Using a repeated measures ANOVA to analyze the data from a pretest-posttest design : a potentially confusing task , 1975 .
[7] G. M. Guthrie,et al. Reciprocity in impression formation. , 1975, The Journal of social psychology.
[8] R. Stogdill. Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness , 1972 .
[9] Abraham K. Korman,et al. Toward an hypothesis of work behavior. , 1970 .
[10] Charles A. Kiesler,et al. The group as an influencing agent in a forced compliance paradigm , 1967 .
[11] Peter M. Blau,et al. Justice in Social Exchange , 1964 .
[12] Seymour Geisser,et al. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1963 .
[13] Robert B. Zajonc,et al. The Effects of Feedback and Probability of Group Success on Individual and Group Performance , 1962 .
[14] E. Lawler,et al. In defense of peer assessment: A rebuttal to Brief's critique. , 1980 .
[15] P. Tannenbaum. The Congruity Principle Revisited: Studies in the Reduction, Induction, and Generalization Of Persuasion1 , 1967 .
[16] C. Osgood,et al. The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. , 1955, Psychological review.