The Effects of Mainstream and Emerging Customer Orientations on Radical and Disruptive Innovations

The merits of being customer-oriented for firm innovation have long been debated. Firms focused on their existing customers have been argued to be less innovative. This paper distinguishes between mainstream and emerging customer orientations and examines their effects on the introduction of disruptive and radical product innovations. Radical product innovations draw on a substantially new technology and could initially be targeted at a mainstream or an emerging market. In contrast, disruptive innovations are initially targeted at an emerging market, and may not involve the newest technology. This paper hypothesizes that mainstream customer orientation is negatively related to disruptive innovation and positively related to radical innovation, and that emerging customer orientation is positively related to disruptive innovation. To test these hypotheses, longitudinal and multiple informant data from senior executives in 128 SBUs of 19 Fortune 200 corporations are analyzed, with technology scanning and willingness to cannibalize as key control variables. The results support the hypotheses, providing evidence for contrasting effects of being oriented to mainstream customers and/or emerging customers on radical and disruptive innovations. Mainstream customer orientation has a positive impact on the introduction of radical innovations but a negative impact on disruptive innovation, while emerging customer orientation has a positive effect on disruptive innovation and is unrelated to radical innovations. Technology scanning is positively related to radical innovation but not to disruptive innovation, supporting the idea that disruptive innovation may not require new technology. In contrast, willingness to cannibalize is positively related to disruptive innovation but not to radical innovation, supporting the idea that radical innovation does not require cannibalization of existing investments. Additionally, mainstream customer orientation is found to have a near-zero correlation with emerging customer orientation, indicating that the two can coexist and can be pursued simultaneously.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[2]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[3]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Market Orientation and Innovation , 1996 .

[4]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance , 2001 .

[5]  V. Govindarajan,et al.  Disruptiveness of innovations: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity , 2006 .

[6]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation , 2001 .

[7]  Erwin Danneels.  Tight–loose coupling with customers: the enactment of customer orientation , 2003 .

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  A model of adaptive organizational search , 1981 .

[9]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Rita Gunther McGrath.  Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity, and Managerial Oversight , 2001 .

[11]  Erwin Danneels.  Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and Research Agenda , 2004 .

[12]  John C. Narver,et al.  The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability , 1990 .

[13]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Corporate imagination and expeditionary marketing. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[14]  Ron Adner.  When Are Technologies Disruptive: A Demand-Based View of the Emergence of Competition , 2002 .

[15]  V. Govindarajan,et al.  The Usefulness of Measuring Disruptiveness of Innovations Ex Post in Making Ex Ante Predictions* , 2006 .

[16]  John C. Narver,et al.  RESEARCH NOTES AND COMMUNICATIONS CUSTOMER-LED AND MARKET-ORIENTED : LET ’ S NOT CONFUSE THE TWO , 2008 .

[17]  K. Zhou,et al.  The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations , 2005 .

[18]  Erwin Danneels.  The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[19]  O. Ferrell,et al.  The effect of market orientation on product innovation , 2000 .

[20]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[21]  John C. Narver,et al.  Responsive and proactive market orientation and new-product success. , 2004 .

[22]  J. Rayport,et al.  Spark innovation through empathic design. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[23]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Scanning the periphery. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[24]  A. Rangaswamy,et al.  Technological Opportunism and Radical Technology Adoption: An Application to E-Business , 2002 .

[25]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[26]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[27]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Markor: A Measure of Market Orientation , 1993 .

[28]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[29]  R. Chandy,et al.  Organizing for Radical Product Innovation: The Overlooked Role of Willingness to Cannibalize , 1998 .

[30]  G. O'Connor.  Market learning and radical innovation: A cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects , 1998 .

[31]  George S. Day,et al.  Misconceptions about Market Orientation , 1999 .

[32]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Assessing Construct Validity in Organizational Research , 1991 .

[33]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[34]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  The misuse of marketing: An American tragedy , 1981 .

[35]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  THE PROCESS OF TECHNOLOGICAL COMPETENCE LEVERAGING , 2007 .

[36]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[37]  P. Nulty.  After years of neglect, a golden age dawns for small business. , 1995, Fortune.