Many Worlds and Schrödinger’s First Quantum Theory

Schrödinger’s first proposal for the interpretation of quantum mechanics was based on a postulate relating the wave function on configuration space to charge density in physical space. Schrödinger apparently later thought that his proposal was empirically wrong. We argue here that this is not the case, at least for a very similar proposal with charge density replaced by mass density. We argue that when analyzed carefully, this theory is seen to be an empirically adequate many-worlds theory and not an empirically inadequate theory describing a single world. Moreover, this formulation—Schrödinger’s first quantum theory—can be regarded as a formulation of the many-worlds view of quantum mechanics that is ontologically clearer than Everett’s. 1. Monstrosity2. Duality3. Parallelity4. Reality5. Nonlocality6. Relativity7. Probability8. Typicality9. Uncertainty10. Summary Monstrosity Duality Parallelity Reality Nonlocality Relativity Probability Typicality Uncertainty Summary

[1]  C. Kilmister.  Schrodinger: Centenary Celebration of a Polymath , 1989 .

[2]  T. Nieuwenhuizen.  What are quantum fluctuations , 2007 .

[3]  Barry Loewer,et al.  Interpreting the many worlds interpretation , 1988, Synthese.

[4]  R. Tumulka.  A Relativistic Version of the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber Model , 2004, quant-ph/0406094.

[5]  David Deutsch.  Quantum theory of probability and decisions , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  A generalization of the Fényes — Nelson stochastic model of quantum mechanics , 1979, quant-ph/0112063.

[7]  J. Gott.  Implications of the Copernican principle for our future prospects , 1993, Nature.

[8]  Alain Aspect,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Quantum mechanics for cosmologists , 2004 .

[9]  Jeffrey A. Barrett,et al.  Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics , 2009, Compendium of Quantum Physics.

[10]  David Deutsch,et al.  The structure of the multiverse , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  Valia Allori,et al.  Fundamental physical theories: mathematical structures grounded on a primitive ontology , 2007 .

[12]  David Wallace.  Everettian Rationality: defending Deutsch's approach to probability in the Everett interpretation , 2003 .

[13]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics , 1989 .

[14]  S. Goldstein,et al.  On the Common Structure of Bohmian Mechanics and the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber Theory , 2006, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[15]  J. Bell,et al.  Schrödinger: Are there quantum jumps? , 1987 .

[16]  Weber,et al.  Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. , 1986, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[17]  Sheldon Goldstein,et al.  Quantum Theory without Observers—Part One , 1998 .

[18]  D. Bohm.  A SUGGESTED INTERPRETATION OF THE QUANTUM THEORY IN TERMS OF "HIDDEN" VARIABLES. II , 1952 .

[19]  David Wallace.  Quantum Probability from Subjective Likelihood: improving on Deutsch's proof of the probability rule , 2003 .

[20]  Hilary Greaves,et al.  Understanding Deutsch's probability in a deterministic multiverse , 2003, quant-ph/0312136.

[21]  Simon Saunders,et al.  Time, quantum mechanics, and decoherence , 1995, Synthese.

[22]  David Wallace.  Epistemology Quantized: circumstances in which we should come to believe in the Everett interpretation , 2006, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[23]  David Wallace,et al.  Everett and structure , 2001 .

[24]  Peter J. Lewis.  Uncertainty and probability for branching selves , 2007 .

[25]  H. Everett.  "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 1957 .

[26]  P. Byrne.  The many worlds of Hugh Everett. , 2007, Scientific American.

[27]  Erwin Schrödinger,et al.  Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics , 1928 .

[28]  P. Tappenden.  Identity and Probability in Everett's Multiverse , 2000, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[29]  Sheldon Goldstein,et al.  Quantum Theory Without Observers , 2007 .

[30]  Albert Einstein,et al.  Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? , 1935 .

[31]  D. Chalmers.  The Conscious Mind , 1996 .

[32]  David John Baker,et al.  Measurement outcomes and probability in Everettian quantum mechanics , 2007 .

[33]  S. Hanauer.  Parallel universes , 2007, Nature Clinical Practice Gastroenterology &Hepatology.

[34]  J. Bell,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quatum Mechanics , 1988 .

[35]  Sheldon Goldstein,et al.  Stochastic mechanics and quantum theory , 1987 .

[36]  P.J. Nahin.  Time travel in Einstein's universe [Books] , 2001, IEEE Spectrum.

[37]  E. Schrödinger.  ARE THERE QUANTUM JUMPS ? , 1952, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[38]  Sheldon Goldstein,et al.  Boltzmann's Approach to Statistical Mechanics , 2001, cond-mat/0105242.

[39]  L. Vaidman.  On schizophrenic experiences of the neutron or why we should believe in the many‐worlds interpretation of quantum theory , 1996, quant-ph/9609006.

[40]  F. D’Agostino.  Relativism , 2003, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[41]  J. Bell,et al.  The Theory of Local Beables , 1975 .

[42]  David Deutsch,et al.  Quantum theory as a universal physical theory , 1985 .

[43]  J. Bell,et al.  Six possible worlds of quantum mechanics , 1992 .

[44]  J. Bell.  On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics , 1966 .

[45]  J. Neumann.  Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 1955 .

[46]  David Wallace,et al.  Branching and Uncertainty , 2008, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[47]  G. Ghirardi,et al.  Describing the macroscopic world: Closing the circle within the dynamical reduction program , 1994 .

[48]  Tobias J. Hagge,et al.  Physics , 1929, Nature.

[49]  D. Dürr,et al.  Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty , 1992, quant-ph/0308039.