“Full numerical” diatomic matrix elements: Simplified shooting method

The problem of diatomic matrix elements Mnn′ = 〈Ψn|Q|Ψn′〉 related to the anharmonic oscillator is considered for standard operators Q of the form x = r – re (r is the radial variable), powers of x, or exponentials, or combinations of such operators; the quantum numbers (n, n′) may be equal or not. A “full numerical” method to determine Mnn′ is presented for any type of the potential U, analytic like that of Morse or numerical like the RKR potential. This numerical method is a simplified version of the standard Cooley shooting method (CSM). The present simplified shooting method (SSM): (1) shoots in one direction only (instead of two); (2) avoids starting problems and matching problems; (3) determines the “end” point automatically (without prior guesses); and (4) reduces thus the number of grid points effectively needed. Examples for analytic (Morse) and RKR potentials are presented. The numerical application to a standard example used by Delgado‐Barrio et al. [J. Comp. Chem., 7, 208 (1986)] using the CSM, and by Kobeissi et al. [J. Comp. Chem., 10, 358 (1989)] using the highly accurate “Canonical Functions” method, shows that when the SSM and CSM are used with the same integrator and the same mesh size the relative discrepancy ΔMnn′(between computed and exact M) is averaged for several (n, n′) to 5.4 × 10−4 for the CSM and to 8.5 × 10−6 for the present SSM. This improvement in accuracy is supplemented by a reduction in computer time consumption. © John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  G. Herzberg,et al.  Spectra of diatomic molecules , 1950 .

[2]  H. Scheingraber,et al.  Determination of diatomic molecular constants using an inverted perturbation approach: Application to the A1Σu+-X1Σg+ system of Mg2 , 1977 .

[3]  H. Kobeissi On an 'eigenvalue function' associated to the electronic potential of any diatomic molecule , 1982 .

[4]  R. Tipping,et al.  Expectation values for Morse oscillators , 1983 .

[5]  A. El-Hajj,et al.  A simplified shooting method for the diatomic eigenvalue problem , 1990 .

[6]  Roy G. Gordon,et al.  Accurate analytic approximations for the rotating Morse oscillator: Energies, wave functions, and matrix elements , 1982 .

[7]  Warren M. Kosman,et al.  Inverse perturbation analysis: Improving the accuracy of potential energy curves☆ , 1975 .

[8]  Requena,et al.  Matrix elements for rotating Morse oscillators. , 1986, Physical review. A, General physics.

[9]  A. El-Hajj,et al.  On the computation of matrix elements between numerical wave functions: The canonical functions method , 1989 .

[10]  S. Miret-Artés,et al.  Matrix elements for anharmonic potentials: Application to I2 morse oscillator , 1986, Journal of computational chemistry.

[11]  O. Klein,et al.  Zur Berechnung von Potentialkurven für zweiatomige Moleküle mit Hilfe von Spektraltermen , 1932 .

[12]  H. Kobeissi,et al.  Vibrational eigenvalues for all levels for the Lennard‐Jones potential , 1988 .

[13]  J. W. Cooley,et al.  An improved eigenvalue corrector formula for solving the Schrödinger equation for central fields , 1961 .

[14]  H. Kobeissi,et al.  On the diatomic vibration–rotation eigenvalue equation: Highly accurate results for high levels , 1984 .

[15]  Ragnar Rydberg,et al.  Graphische Darstellung einiger bandenspektroskopischer Ergebnisse , 1932 .

[16]  Moreno,et al.  Analytical and algebraic solutions of the rotating Morse oscillators: Matrix elements of arbitrary powers of (r-re)lexp , 1990, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[17]  V. Vasan,et al.  Matrix elements for Morse oscillators , 1983 .

[18]  M. L. Sánchez,et al.  MORSMATEL: a rapid and efficient code to calculate vibration-rotational matrix elements for r-dependent operators of two Morse oscillators , 1992 .

[19]  J. Huffaker,et al.  Morse‐oscillator matrix elements appropriate for vibration‐rotation intensities of diatomic molecules , 1982 .