Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers.

PURPOSE To identify visual factors that are significantly associated with increased vehicle crashes in older drivers. METHODS Several aspects of vision and visual information processing were assessed in 294 drivers aged 55 to 90 years. The sample was stratified with respect to age and crash frequency during the 5-year period before the test date. Variables assessed included eye health status, visual sensory function, the size of the useful field of view, and cognitive status. Crash data were obtained from state records. RESULTS The size of the useful field of view, a test of visual attention, had high sensitivity (89%) and specificity (81%) in predicting which older drivers had a history of crash problems. This level of predictability is unprecedented in research on crash risk in older drivers. Older adults with substantial shrinkage in the useful field of view were six times more likely to have incurred one or more crashes in the previous 5-year period. Eye health status, visual sensory function, cognitive status, and chronological age were significantly correlated with crashes, but were relatively poor at discriminating between crash-involved versus crash-free drivers. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that policies that restrict driving privileges based solely on age or on common stereotypes of age-related declines in vision and cognition are scientifically unfounded. With the identification of a visual attention measure highly predictive of crash problems in the elderly, this study points to a way in which the suitability of licensure in the older adult population could be based on objective, performance-based criteria.

[1]  G. Hale,et al.  National Research Council , 1923, Journal of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers.

[2]  J. A. Waller Chronic medical conditions and traffic safety: review of the California experience. , 1965, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Relation of a test of attention to road accidents. , 1973 .

[4]  A Burg,et al.  VISION AND AUDITION IN DRIVING , 1974 .

[5]  W. L. Mihal,et al.  Individual differences in perceptual information processing and their relation to automobile accident involvement. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  D Shinar,et al.  DRIVER VISUAL LIMITATIONS DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT , 1977 .

[7]  B L Hills,et al.  A reanalysis of California driver vision data: general findings , 1977 .

[8]  D Shinar,et al.  DRIVER PERFORMANCE AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN ATTENTION AND INFORMATION PROCESSING. VOLUME II: FIELD DEPENDENCE AND HIGHWAY SAFETY , 1978 .

[9]  D. Shinar,et al.  DRIVER PERFORMANCE AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN ATTENTION AND INFORMATION PROCESSING. VOLUME 1: DRIVER INATTENTION , 1978 .

[10]  T. Dawber,et al.  The Framingham Eye Study monograph: An ophthalmological and epidemiological study of cataract, glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, and visual acuity in a general population of 2631 adults, 1973-1975. , 1980, Survey of ophthalmology.

[11]  K Simons,et al.  A comparison of the Frisby, Random-Dot E, TNO, and Randot circles stereotests in screening and office use. , 1981, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  C. Johnson,et al.  Incidence of visual field loss in 20,000 eyes and its relationship to driving performance. , 1983, Archives of ophthalmology.

[14]  Emilio C. Campos,et al.  The Accupational Visual Field: II. Practical Aspects: The functional Visual Field in Abnormal Conditions and Its Relationship to Visual Ergonomics, Visual Impairment and Job Fitness , 1985 .

[15]  W. Hoyer,et al.  Age and the selectivity of visual information processing. , 1986, Psychology and aging.

[16]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Visual localization: age and practice. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[18]  D. Drachman,et al.  Who may drive? Who may not? Who shall decemberide? , 1988, Annals of neurology.

[19]  L. Tune,et al.  Driving in Patients with Dementia , 1988, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[20]  J. Haxby,et al.  Motor vehicle crashes in dementia of the alzheimer type , 1988, Annals of neurology.

[21]  D. Roenker,et al.  Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[22]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  A Primer of LISREL , 1989 .

[23]  D. Roenker,et al.  Developmental changes in attention and visual search throughout adulthood. , 1990 .

[24]  K Ball,et al.  Identifying Correlates of Accident Involvement for the Older Driver , 1991, Human factors.

[25]  P. Nestor,et al.  Attention and Driving Skills in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease , 1991, Human factors.

[26]  K. Ball,et al.  Visual/cognitive correlates of vehicle accidents in older drivers. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[27]  P F Waller,et al.  The Older Driver , 1991, Human factors.

[28]  D Shinar,et al.  Visual Requirements for Safety and Mobility of Older Drivers , 1991, Human factors.

[29]  Maurice Boland Safety and Mobility of Older Drivers , 1994 .