Neuronal Communication: Presynaptic Terminals as Transmitter Array

In this paper, a communication engineering model is proposed for capturing the actual behavior of biological neurons by accounting for the specific and unique processing performed by the presynaptic terminals. Specifically, experimental evidences show that: i) the release sites from a single axon can have variable release probabilities, even when the axon contacts the same postsynaptic neuron; ii) this variability in the release probability implies a compartmentalization at the level of the presynaptic terminals of the neuronal processing; iii) the specificity of the presynaptic terminal processing is driven by and reflects the complex biophysical mechanisms activated at the axon terminals by the spikes fired by the neuron in response to a stimulus. Stemming from these experimental evidences, we propose to model the presynaptic terminals as an array of transmitters, where each transmitter models the specific processing made by a presynaptic terminal. We conduct the analysis through a stochastic approach, since the synaptic transmission is inherently stochastic. In particular, we first analytically characterize the stochastic filtering of the spike train performed by each presynaptic terminal. Then, we characterize the propagation of the presynaptic-filtered signal through the synaptic cleft, and we derive the signaling delay as a function of the distance between the pre- and the postsynaptic neurons. Finally, the conducted theoretical analysis is validate through numerical simulation.

[1]  Wolfgang Maass,et al.  Dynamic Stochastic Synapses as Computational Units , 1997, Neural Computation.

[2]  H. Markram,et al.  Information Processing with Frequency-Dependent Synaptic Connections , 1998, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[3]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  Detection Techniques for Diffusion-based Molecular Communication , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[4]  L. Abbott,et al.  Synaptic computation , 2004, Nature.

[5]  Angela Sara Cacciapuoti,et al.  Receiver Design for a Bionic Nervous System: Modeling the Dendritic Processing Power , 2016, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[6]  Yevgeni Koucheryavy,et al.  A Service-Oriented Architecture for Body Area NanoNetworks with Neuron-based Molecular Communication , 2014, Mob. Networks Appl..

[7]  H Parnas,et al.  Diffusion cannot govern the discharge of neurotransmitter in fast synapses. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[8]  T. Branco,et al.  Local Dendritic Activity Sets Release Probability at Hippocampal Synapses , 2008, Neuron.

[9]  M. Häusser,et al.  Intersynaptic diffusion of neurotransmitter. , 1997, Trends in neurosciences.

[10]  Ian F. Akyildiz Nanonetworks: A new frontier in communications , 2010, 2010 International Conference on e-Business (ICE-B).

[11]  Alex M. Thomson,et al.  Presynaptic Frequency- and Pattern-Dependent Filtering , 2003, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[12]  B. A. Sava,et al.  Electrophysiological and morphological properties of Cajal–Retzius cells with different ontogenetic origins , 2010, Neuroscience.

[13]  Elad Alon,et al.  Neural Dust: An Ultrasonic, Low Power Solution for Chronic Brain-Machine Interfaces , 2013, 1307.2196.

[14]  H. Markram,et al.  The neural code between neocortical pyramidal neurons depends on neurotransmitter release probability. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Ilangko Balasingham,et al.  From Nano-Scale Neural Excitability to Long Term Synaptic Modification , 2014, NANOCOM' 14.

[16]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Graphene-based Plasmonic Nano-Antenna for Terahertz Band Communication in Nanonetworks , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.