Simple design of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames for earthquake resistance

Abstract The extensive use of reinforced concrete frames with masonry infill and national and European regulations, which often neglect the influence of infill, has been identified as a field of research. The reliability of a numerical model with an equivalent diagonal for the parametric analysis of model buildings was tested using various experiments with one-story, one-bay and multi-storey, multi-bay infilled frames. Variability of parameters was simplified by classifying components based on material strength (masonry infill) and the coefficients of longitudinal reinforcement (reinforced concrete frame). The number of storeys, area ratio of infilled frame area in relation to the floor area (ρ), and the variability of ground acceleration as a measure of earthquake loading were investigated. The results show increased contribution to damage with increased number of storeys, decreased compressive strength of masonry infill, reduced longitudinal reinforcement ratio of columns, reduced area ratio, and increased peak ground acceleration (PGA) value. In the numerical model, area ratio ρ was observed to have significant importance and thus the minimum value of area ratio was defined. The study resulted in method, which enables simple design of infilled frames. Based on the classification (masonry infill, peak ground acceleration, number of storeys) minimum infilled frame area ratio can be determined and according to calculation of real area ratio for observed building can be compared in order to infilled frame building achieve acceptable behaviour under possible earthquake event.

[1]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  Practice‐oriented probabilistic seismic performance assessment of infilled frames with consideration of shear failure of columns , 2013 .

[2]  Paolo Negro,et al.  Effect of Infills on the Global Behaviour of R/C Frames. Energy Considerations from Pseudodynamic Tests , 1996 .

[3]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Simplified non‐linear seismic analysis of infilled reinforced concrete frames , 2005 .

[4]  O. Buyukozturk,et al.  Masonry infill walls in reinforced concrete frames as a source of structural damping , 2014 .

[5]  F. Colangelo Pseudo-dynamic seismic response of reinforced concrete frames infilled with non-structural brick masonry , 2005 .

[6]  J. Strossmayer COMPARISON OF NON-LINEAR MASONRY INFILL MACRO-MODELS , 2014 .

[7]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Pre‐ and post‐test mathematical modelling of a plan‐asymmetric reinforced concrete frame building , 2006 .

[8]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practise in Turkey , 2003 .

[9]  T. Takeda,et al.  Reinforced Concrete response to simulated earthquakes , 1970 .

[10]  Paolo Negro,et al.  Irregularities induced by nonstructural masonry panels in framed buildings , 1997 .

[11]  Durgesh C. Rai,et al.  Stress-Strain Characteristics of Clay Brick Masonry under Uniaxial Compression , 2007 .

[12]  I. Iervolino,et al.  Eurocode 8 Compliant Real Record Sets for Seismic Analysis of Structures , 2008 .

[13]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  IM-based and EDP-based decision models for the verification of the seismic collapse safety of buildings , 2017 .

[14]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES INFILLED WITH WEAKLY REINFORCED MASONRY PANELS , 2001 .

[15]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame — a deterministic assessment , 2008 .

[16]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  Seismic fragility functions of industrial precast building classes , 2016 .

[17]  Paolo Negro,et al.  PsD Test on Four-Story R/C Building Designed According to Eurocodes , 1996 .

[18]  Matej Fischinger Performance-Based Seismic Engineering: Vision for an Earthquake Resilient Society , 2014 .

[19]  P. Benson Shing,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Masonry-Infilled RC Frames , 1996 .

[20]  C. Valente,et al.  Shaking table tests on reinforced concrete frames without and with passive control systems , 2005 .

[21]  Adam J Crewe,et al.  Shaking table tests of 1:4 reduced‐scale models of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frame buildings , 2001 .

[22]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[23]  Iunio Iervolino,et al.  REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis , 2010 .

[24]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Shake‐table experiment on reinforced concrete structure containing masonry infill wall , 2006 .

[25]  Marijana Hadzima-Nyarko,et al.  Earthquake performance of infilled frames using neural networks and experimental database , 2013 .

[26]  Mete A. Sozen,et al.  Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Low-Rise Buildings in Regions with Infrequent Earthquakes , 1997 .

[27]  Mark Aschheim,et al.  Yield Point Spectra for Seismic Design and Rehabilitation , 2000 .

[28]  Michael N. Fardis,et al.  Seismic Design and Response of Bare and Masonry-Infilled Reinforced Concrete Buildings Part II: Infilled Structures , 1997 .

[29]  B Stafford Smith,et al.  A METHOD OF ANALYSIS FOR INFILLED FRAMES. , 1969 .