Spin-Transfer Torque Switching Above Ambient Temperature

We report the temperature dependences of tunneling magnetoresistance ratio, coercivity, thermal stability, and switching current distribution of magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) in the temperature range 25-80°C, the most probable working environment for spin-transfer torque random access memory (STT-RAM). Two distinct temperature dependence of the switching current density are apparent due to two switching mechanisms: a switching current density decrease with increasing temperature in the long-pulse ( >; 1 μs) regime, a result of thermally activated switching, but no decrease in the short-pulse (>;10 ns) regime, as a result of precessional switching. In the temperature range studied, the switching current density variation is less sensitive to environmental temperature than it is to switching time. Thus, switching time is the more important factor to consider in STT-RAM design.

[1]  Takayuki Kawahara,et al.  Challenges toward gigabit-scale spin-transfer torque random access memory and beyond for normally off, green information technology infrastructure (Invited) , 2011 .

[2]  D C Ralph,et al.  Thermally activated magnetic reversal induced by a spin-polarized current. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[3]  J. Katine,et al.  Time-resolved reversal of spin-transfer switching in a nanomagnet. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[4]  V. Nikitin,et al.  Non-volatile spin-transfer torque RAM (STT-RAM) , 2010, 68th Device Research Conference.

[5]  S. Ikeda,et al.  TMR Design Methodology for SPin-Transfer Torque RAM (SPRAM) with Nonvolatile and SRAM Compatible Operations , 2008, 2008 Joint Non-Volatile Semiconductor Memory Workshop and International Conference on Memory Technology and Design.

[6]  R. Victora,et al.  Predicted time dependence of the switching field for magnetic materials. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[7]  Z. Li,et al.  Thermally assisted magnetization reversal in the presence of a spin-transfer torque , 2003 .

[8]  Anthony B. Kos,et al.  Physical limitations to efficient high-speed spin-torque switching in magnetic tunnel junctions , 2011 .

[9]  Temperature dependence of spin-transfer-induced switching of nanomagnets. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[10]  J. Slonczewski.  Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers , 1996 .

[11]  Jonathan Z. Sun.  Spin-current interaction with a monodomain magnetic body: A model study , 2000 .

[12]  Mircea R. Stan,et al.  Advances and Future Prospects of Spin-Transfer Torque Random Access Memory , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[13]  Jian-Ping Wang,et al.  Composite free layer for high density magnetic random access memory with lower spin transfer current , 2006 .

[14]  Hitoshi Kubota,et al.  Switching-probability distribution of spin-torque switching in MgO-based magnetic tunnel junctions , 2011 .

[15]  Hiroshi Kano,et al.  Thermal activation effect on spin transfer switching in magnetic tunnel junctions , 2005 .

[16]  Tom Zhong,et al.  A Study of Write Margin of Spin Torque Transfer Magnetic Random Access Memory Technology , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[17]  Berger.  Emission of spin waves by a magnetic multilayer traversed by a current. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[18]  E. Chen,et al.  Non-volatile spin-transfer torque RAM (STT-RAM): Data, analysis and design requirements for thermal stability , 2010, 2010 Symposium on VLSI Technology.

[19]  Ilya Krivorotov,et al.  Low writing energy and sub nanosecond spin torque transfer switching of in-plane magnetic tunnel junction for spin torque transfer random access memory , 2011 .

[20]  D. Dimitrov,et al.  Spin Torque Induced Magnetization Switching Variations , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[21]  J. Katine,et al.  Device implications of spin-transfer torques , 2008 .