Perceived accessibility is an important factor in transport choice — Results from the AVENUE project

Abstract Background Stimulating active transport by encouraging replacement of short-distance car trips by active transport modes such as cycling or walking has become a popular policy strategy. It has been suggested that neighbourhoods, designed to facilitate healthy behaviour, can influence a person׳s behavioural choices such as transport choice. In the present study, we investigated the association between perceived accessibility of facilities and transport choice for three different trip purposes (shopping, going to public natural spaces, and going to sports facilities) in the Netherlands. Methods An online questionnaire ( N =3663) was used to collect data concerning transport choice for the general Dutch population over a period of one calendar year starting July 2012. Logistic regression analyses were used to model the odds of cycling versus car use and to model the odds of walking versus car use. Results When perceived accessibility by car is high, persons were less likely to use active transport modes (OR range: 0.09–0.66) and when perceived accessibility by active transport modes is high, persons were more likely to use the bicycle (OR range: 2.18–10.43) or walk (OR range: 2.97–11.22). Conclusions Our results showed a strong association between perceived accessibility and transport choice even after adjusting for personal and environmental characteristics. Our results suggest that perceived accessibility should be taken into account when stimulating a shift from car use to cycling or walking.

[1]  J. Sallis,et al.  Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures , 2003, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[2]  W. Wendel-Vos,et al.  How Combined Trip Purposes Are Associated with Transport Choice for Short Distance Trips. Results from a Cross-Sectional Study in the Netherlands , 2014, PloS one.

[3]  C. Friedenreich,et al.  Sex- and age-specific seasonal variations in physical activity among adults , 2009, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[4]  Ilse de Bourdeaudhuij,et al.  Correspondence between objective and perceived walking times to urban destinations: Influence of physical activity, neighbourhood walkability, and socio-demographics , 2012, International Journal of Health Geographics.

[5]  D. Metz Mobility, access, and choice: a new source of evidence , 2013 .

[6]  Dea van Lierop,et al.  The happy commuter: a comparison of commuter satisfaction across modes , 2014 .

[7]  H. de Vries,et al.  The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): short-term effects. , 2003, Health education research.

[8]  J. Salmon,et al.  Mismatch between perceived and objective measures of physical activity environments. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[9]  N. Owen,et al.  Destinations that matter: associations with walking for transport. , 2007, Health & place.

[10]  Nico Van de Weghe,et al.  Relationship between the physical environment and different domains of physical activity in European adults: a systematic review , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[11]  Ester Cerin,et al.  Objective Versus Perceived Walking Distances to Destinations , 2008 .

[12]  I. Hendriksen,et al.  Characteristics of a population of commuter cyclists in the Netherlands: perceived barriers and facilitators in the personal, social and physical environment , 2010, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[13]  Ralph Buehler,et al.  Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany , 2008 .

[14]  Henk Stipdonk,et al.  Personal and Environmental Characteristics Associated with Choice of Active Transport Modes versus Car Use for Different Trip Purposes of Trips up to 7.5 Kilometers in The Netherlands , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  C. Wagenaar Town Planning in the Netherlands: Since 1800 , 2016 .

[16]  Luc Int Panis,et al.  Improving health through policies that promote active travel: a review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment. , 2011, Environment international.

[17]  A. Woodward,et al.  Moving urban trips from cars to bicycles: impact on health and emissions , 2011, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[18]  K. Teschke,et al.  Motivators and deterrents of bicycling: comparing influences on decisions to ride , 2011 .

[19]  W. Saris,et al.  Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  Henk Stipdonk,et al.  The Effect on Road Safety of a Modal Shift From Car to Bicycle , 2012, Traffic injury prevention.

[21]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  URBAN ACCESSIBILITY INDEX: LITERATURE REVIEW , 2000 .

[22]  H. Nijland,et al.  Do the Health Benefits of Cycling Outweigh the Risks? , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  W. Wendel-Vos,et al.  The SQUASH was a more valid tool than the OBiN for categorizing adults according to the Dutch physical activity and the combined guideline. , 2012, Journal of clinical epidemiology.