The flash grab effect

When an object moves back and forth, its trajectory appears significantly shorter than it actually is. The object appears to stop and reverse well before its actual reversal point, as if there is some averaging of location within a window of about 100 ms (Sinico et al., 2009). Surprisingly, if a bar is flashed at the physical end point of the trajectory, right on top of the object, just as it reverses direction, the flash is also shifted - grabbed by the object - and is seen at the perceived endpoint of the trajectory rather than the physical endpoint. This can shift the perceived location of the flash by as much as 2 or 3 times its physical size and by up to several degrees of visual angle. We first show that the position shift of the flash is generated by the trajectory shortening, as the same shift is seen with or without the flash. The flash itself is only grabbed if it is presented within a small spatiotemporal attraction zone around the physical end point of the trajectory. Any flash falling in that zone is pulled toward the perceived endpoint. The effect scales linearly with speed, up to a maximum, and is independent of the contrast of the moving stimulus once it is above 5%. Finally, we demonstrate that this position shift requires attention. These results reveal a new "flash grab" effect in the family of motion-induced position shifts. Although it most resembles the flash drag effect, it differs from this in the following ways: (1) it has a different temporal profile, (2) it requires attention, (3) it is about 10 times larger.

[1]  I. Murakami,et al.  Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Lappe,et al.  Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  R. L. Valois,et al.  Vernier acuity with stationary moving Gabors , 1991, Vision Research.

[4]  M. Lappe,et al.  The position of moving objects. , 2000, Perception.

[5]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  The Motion Aftereffect:A Modern Perspective , 1998 .

[6]  P. McEwen Figural after-effects , 1958 .

[7]  S. Klein,et al.  Evidence for an Attentional Component of the Perceptual Misalignment between Moving and Flashing Stimuli , 2002, Perception.

[8]  Albert S. Bregman,et al.  The Auditory Scene. (Book Reviews: Auditory Scene Analysis. The Perceptual Organization of Sound.) , 1990 .

[9]  Harold E Bedell,et al.  Differential latencies and the dynamics of the position computation process for moving targets, assessed with the flash-lag effect , 2004, Vision Research.

[10]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  Perceived shrinkage of motion paths. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Updating and the Flash-Lag Effect , 2004, Psychological science.

[12]  David Whitney,et al.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Behavioral significance of motion direction causes anisotropic flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-repulsion, and movement-mislocalization effects. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[14]  R. Nijhawan,et al.  Visual decomposition of colour through motion extrapolation , 1997, Nature.

[15]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Sex-specific norms code face identity. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[17]  David Whitney,et al.  Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Szonya Durant,et al.  Temporal dependence of local motion induced shifts in perceived position , 2004, Vision Research.

[19]  I. Murakami,et al.  A flash-drag effect in random motion reveals involvement of preattentive motion processing. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[20]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  The motion-induced position shift depends on the visual awareness of motion , 2005, Vision Research.

[21]  H. Wallach,et al.  Figural aftereffects; an investigation of visual processes. , 1944 .

[22]  D. M. MacKay Interactive Processes in Visual Perception , 2012 .

[23]  Neil W. Roach,et al.  Dynamics of Spatial Distortions Reveal Multiple Time Scales of Motion Adaptation , 2009, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  David Whitney,et al.  Contribution of bottom-up and top-down motion processes to perceived position. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Terrence J Sejnowski,et al.  Motion signals bias localization judgments: a unified explanation for the flash-lag, flash-drag, flash-jump, and Frohlich illusions. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[26]  P Cavanagh,et al.  The Position of Moving Objects , 2000, Science.

[27]  Romi Nijhawan,et al.  Motion extrapolation in catching , 1994, Nature.

[28]  B. Khurana,et al.  Space and Time in Perception and Action: Space–time and awareness , 2010 .

[29]  David Whitney,et al.  The motion-induced shift in the perceived location of a grating also shifts its aftereffect. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[30]  David Whitney,et al.  Voluntary attention modulates motion-induced mislocalization. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[31]  Friedrich W. Fröhlich,et al.  Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit , 1930 .

[32]  W. Metzger,et al.  Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phänomene Fröhlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empfindungszeit , 1932 .

[33]  H. Snippe Psychophysical signatures associated with magnocellular and parvocellular pathway contrast gain: comment. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[34]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Illusory Displacement of Equiluminous Kinetic Edges , 1990, Perception.

[35]  I. Rock,et al.  Inattentional blindness: An overview , 2003 .

[36]  P. Lennie,et al.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  P. Dayan,et al.  Space and time in visual context , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[38]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Attentive tracking shifts the perceived location of a nearby flash , 2005, Vision Research.

[39]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Limits of attentive tracking reveal temporal properties of attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[40]  K. Shapiro,et al.  The contingent negative variation (CNV) event-related potential (ERP) predicts the attentional blink , 2008 .

[41]  R. Nijhawan,et al.  Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  Markus Lappe,et al.  A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process , 2000, Vision Research.

[43]  S. Mateeff,et al.  Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away , 1988, Vision Research.

[44]  T. Wiesel Neural Mechanisms of Visual Perception , 1997 .