Error analysis in suppression of unwanted qubit interactions for a parametric gate in a tunable superconducting circuit

We experimentally demonstrate a parametric iswap gate in a superconducting circuit based on a tunable coupler for achieving a continuous tunability to eliminate unwanted qubit interactions. We implement the two-qubit iswap gate by applying a fast-flux bias modulation pulse on the coupler to turn on parametric exchange interaction between computational qubits. The controllable interaction can provide an extra degree of freedom to verify the optimal condition for constructing the parametric gate. Aiming to fully investigate error sources of the two-qubit gates, we perform quantum process tomography measurements and numerical simulations as varying static $ZZ$ coupling strength. We quantitatively calculate the dynamic $ZZ$ coupling parasitizing in two-qubit gate operation, and extract the particular gate error from the decoherence, dynamic $ZZ$ coupling, and high-order oscillation terms. Our results reveal that the main gate error comes from the decoherence, while the increase in the dynamic $ZZ$ coupling and high-order oscillation error degrades the parametric gate performance. This approach, which has not yet been previously explored, provides a guiding principle to improve gate fidelity of a parametric iswap gate by suppression of the unwanted qubit interactions. This controllable interaction, together with the parametric modulation technique, is desirable for crosstalk-free multiqubit quantum circuits and quantum simulation applications.

[1]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Introduction to the Tenth Anniversary Edition , 2010 .

[2]  Tunable coupling scheme for flux qubits at the optimal point , 2005, cond-mat/0512238.

[3]  S. Girvin,et al.  Charge-insensitive qubit design derived from the Cooper pair box , 2007, cond-mat/0703002.

[4]  Alexandre Blais,et al.  Quantum information processing with circuit quantum electrodynamics , 2007 .

[5]  L. DiCarlo,et al.  Demonstration of two-qubit algorithms with a superconducting quantum processor , 2009, Nature.

[6]  Erik Lucero,et al.  Violation of Bell's inequality in Josephson phase qubits , 2009, Nature.

[7]  Jens Koch,et al.  Randomized benchmarking and process tomography for gate errors in a solid-state qubit. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[8]  Michel Devoret,et al.  Signal-to-pump back action and self-oscillation in double-pump Josephson parametric amplifier , 2009, 0902.0007.

[9]  J M Gambetta,et al.  Simple pulses for elimination of leakage in weakly nonlinear qubits. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[10]  John M. Martinis,et al.  Analysis of a tunable coupler for superconducting phase qubits , 2010, 1006.3351.

[11]  D. DiVincenzo,et al.  Schrieffer-Wolff transformation for quantum many-body systems , 2011, 1105.0675.

[12]  J. Clarke,et al.  Dispersive magnetometry with a quantum limited SQUID parametric amplifier , 2010, 1003.2466.

[13]  M Weides,et al.  Fast tunable coupler for superconducting qubits. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[14]  Blake R. Johnson,et al.  Simple all-microwave entangling gate for fixed-frequency superconducting qubits. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[15]  John A Smolin,et al.  Entanglement of two superconducting qubits in a waveguide cavity via monochromatic two-photon excitation. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[16]  T. S. Mahesh,et al.  NMR implementation of a quantum delayed-choice experiment , 2011, 1112.3524.

[17]  Franco Nori,et al.  QuTiP: An open-source Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems , 2011, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[18]  A. Houck,et al.  On-chip quantum simulation with superconducting circuits , 2012, Nature Physics.

[19]  Franco Nori,et al.  QuTiP 2: A Python framework for the dynamics of open quantum systems , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[20]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Microwave-activated conditional-phase gate for superconducting qubits , 2013, 1307.2594.

[21]  A. Korotkov Error matrices in quantum process tomography , 2013, 1309.6405.

[22]  C. Macklin,et al.  Observing single quantum trajectories of a superconducting quantum bit , 2013, Nature.

[23]  Zijun Chen,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of aluminum airbridges for superconducting microwave circuits , 2013, 1310.2325.

[24]  Charles Neill,et al.  Tunable coupler for superconducting Xmon qubits: Perturbative nonlinear model , 2014, 1405.1915.

[25]  C. Zu,et al.  Experimental realization of universal geometric quantum gates with solid-state spins , 2014, Nature.

[26]  A N Cleland,et al.  Qubit Architecture with High Coherence and Fast Tunable Coupling. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[27]  Jay M. Gambetta,et al.  Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system , 2015, 1510.04375.

[28]  Austin G. Fowler,et al.  Leakage-resilient approach to fault-tolerant quantum computing with superconducting elements , 2014, 1406.2404.

[29]  J. Gambetta,et al.  Procedure for systematically tuning up cross-talk in the cross-resonance gate , 2016, 1603.04821.

[30]  Jay M. Gambetta,et al.  Universal Gate for Fixed-Frequency Qubits via a Tunable Bus , 2016, 1604.03076.

[31]  Andrew W. Cross,et al.  Experimental Demonstration of Fault-Tolerant State Preparation with Superconducting Qubits. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[32]  Enrique Solano,et al.  Digital-analog quantum simulations with superconducting circuits , 2017, 1711.09810.

[33]  Jens Koch,et al.  Universal Stabilization of a Parametrically Coupled Qubit. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[34]  Stefan Filipp,et al.  Analysis of a parametrically driven exchange-type gate and a two-photon excitation gate between superconducting qubits , 2017, 1708.02090.

[35]  N. Langford,et al.  Tuneable hopping and nonlinear cross-Kerr interactions in a high-coherence superconducting circuit , 2018, npj Quantum Information.

[36]  Fei Yan,et al.  Tunable Coupling Scheme for Implementing High-Fidelity Two-Qubit Gates , 2018, Physical Review Applied.

[37]  Oleksandr Kyriienko,et al.  Floquet Quantum Simulation with Superconducting Qubits , 2017, Physical Review Applied.

[38]  Sabrina Hong,et al.  Demonstration of universal parametric entangling gates on a multi-qubit lattice , 2017, Science Advances.

[39]  Tao Chen,et al.  Perfect quantum state transfer in a superconducting qubit chain with parametrically tunable couplings. , 2018, 1806.03886.

[40]  John C. Platt,et al.  Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor , 2019, Nature.

[41]  Andrew A. Houck,et al.  Suppression of Qubit Crosstalk in a Tunable Coupling Superconducting Circuit , 2018, Physical Review Applied.

[42]  L. Duan,et al.  A tunable coupler for suppressing adjacent superconducting qubit coupling , 2019, 1912.10721.

[43]  Suotang Jia,et al.  Observation of Topological Magnon Insulator States in a Superconducting Circuit. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[44]  H. Fan,et al.  Generation of multicomponent atomic Schrödinger cat states of up to 20 qubits , 2019, Science.

[45]  L. Duan,et al.  Tunable Coupler for Realizing a Controlled-Phase Gate with Dynamically Decoupled Regime in a Superconducting Circuit , 2019 .

[46]  Z. Xue,et al.  Experimental Implementation of Universal Nonadiabatic Geometric Quantum Gates in a Superconducting Circuit. , 2019, Physical review letters.