Cell mechanics control rapid transitions between blebs and lamellipodia during migration

Protrusion formation is an essential step during cell migration. Cells migrating in three-dimensional environments and in vivo can form a wide variety of protrusion types, including actin polymerization-driven lamellipodia, and contractility-driven blebs. The ability to switch between different protrusions has been proposed to facilitate motility in complex environments and to promote cancer dissemination. However, plasticity in protrusion formation has so far mostly been investigated in the context of transitions between amoeboid and mesenchymal migration modes, which involve substantial changes in overall cell morphology. As a result, the minimal requirements of transitions between blebs and lamellipodia, as well as the time scales on which they occur, remain unknown. To address these questions, we investigated protrusion switching during cell migration at the single cell level. Using cells that can be induced to form either blebs or lamellipodia, we systematically assessed the mechanical requirements, as well as the dynamics, of switching between protrusion types. We demonstrate that shifting the balance between actin protrusivity and actomyosin contractility leads to immediate transitions between blebs and lamellipodia in migrating cells. Switching occurred without changes in global cell shape, polarity, or cell adhesion. Furthermore, rapid transitions between blebs and lamellipodia could also be triggered upon changes in substrate adhesion during migration on micropatterned surfaces. Together, our data reveal that the type of protrusion formed by migrating cells can be dynamically controlled independently of overall cell morphology, suggesting that protrusion formation is an autonomous module in the regulatory network that controls the plasticity of cell migration.

[1]  C. Marshall,et al.  The plasticity of cytoskeletal dynamics underlying neoplastic cell migration. , 2010, Current opinion in cell biology.

[2]  Michael Sixt,et al.  Mechanical modes of 'amoeboid' cell migration. , 2009, Current opinion in cell biology.

[3]  G. Dunn,et al.  Phenotype modulation in non-adherent and adherent sublines of Walker carcinosarcoma cells: the role of cell-substratum contacts and microtubules in controlling cell shape, locomotion and cytoskeletal structure. , 2002, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[4]  T. Pollard,et al.  Cellular Motility Driven by Assembly and Disassembly of Actin Filaments , 2003, Cell.

[5]  Alberto Diaspro,et al.  Endocytic Trafficking of Rac Is Required for the Spatial Restriction of Signaling in Cell Migration , 2008, Cell.

[6]  T. Pollard,et al.  Characterization of two classes of small molecule inhibitors of Arp2/3 complex , 2009, Nature.

[7]  E. Fama,et al.  Migration , 2007 .

[8]  T. Holak,et al.  Lifeact: a versatile marker to visualize F-actin , 2008, Nature Methods.

[9]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Changes in the mechanical properties of fibroblasts during spreading: a micromanipulation study , 1999, European Biophysics Journal.

[10]  J. Trinkaus Surface activity and locomotion of Fundulus deep cells during blastula and gastrula stages. , 1973, Developmental biology.

[11]  M. Sixt,et al.  Rapid leukocyte migration by integrin-independent flowing and squeezing , 2008, Nature.

[12]  J. Tinevez,et al.  Role of cortical tension in bleb growth , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  A. Ridley Life at the Leading Edge , 2011, Cell.

[14]  P. Friedl,et al.  Tumour-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanisms , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[15]  E. Sahai,et al.  Rac Activation and Inactivation Control Plasticity of Tumor Cell Movement , 2008, Cell.

[16]  Thomas D Pollard,et al.  Cellular Motility Driven by Assembly and Disassembly of Actin Filaments , 2003, Cell.

[17]  B. Kuhlman,et al.  A genetically-encoded photoactivatable Rac controls the motility of living cells , 2009, Nature.

[18]  B. Goldstein,et al.  In vivo roles for Arp2/3 in cortical actin organization during C. elegans gastrulation , 2009, Journal of Cell Science.

[19]  D. Baillie,et al.  A Formin Homology Protein and a Profilin Are Required for Cytokinesis and Arp2/3-Independent Assembly of Cortical Microfilaments in C. elegans , 2002, Current Biology.

[20]  Alba Diz-Muñoz,et al.  Control of Directed Cell Migration In Vivo by Membrane-to-Cortex Attachment , 2010, PLoS biology.

[21]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of living cells. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  Erik Sahai,et al.  Differing modes of tumour cell invasion have distinct requirements for Rho/ROCK signalling and extracellular proteolysis , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[23]  R. Kay,et al.  Blebbing of Dictyostelium cells in response to chemoattractant. , 2006, Experimental cell research.

[24]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  Erez Raz,et al.  A role for Rho GTPases and cell–cell adhesion in single-cell motility in vivo , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.

[26]  V. Barr,et al.  Interference Reflection Microscopy , 2009, Current protocols in cell biology.

[27]  P. Friedl,et al.  The Journal of Cell Biology , 2002 .

[28]  K. Yoshida,et al.  Myosin II-dependent cylindrical protrusions induced by quinine in Dictyostelium: antagonizing effects of actin polymerization at the leading edge. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[29]  H. Endo,et al.  Pigment cell development in rhesus monkey eyes: an electron microscopic and histochemical study. , 1973, Developmental biology.

[30]  Guillaume Charras,et al.  Blebs lead the way: how to migrate without lamellipodia , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  T. Soldati,et al.  Dissection of amoeboid movement into two mechanically distinct modes , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[32]  A. Hall,et al.  Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. , 1998, Science.

[33]  P Elvin,et al.  A study of the adhesive, locomotory and invasive behaviour of Walker 256 carcinosarcoma cells. , 1985, Experimental cell biology.

[34]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  An Adhesion-Dependent Switch between Mechanisms That Determine Motile Cell Shape , 2011, PLoS biology.

[35]  Ann Pellegrini Movement , 2011 .

[36]  Jérémie Rossy,et al.  Role of Rho, Rac, and Rho-kinase in phosphorylation of myosin light chain, development of polarity, and spontaneous migration of Walker 256 carcinosarcoma cells. , 2005, Experimental cell research.