Task-based methods for evaluating electrically stimulated antagonist muscle controllers

Single-joint motor neural prosthesis control algorithms were tested in a novel animal model. The model consisted of a human subject who provided joystick inputs to a controller. The controller output determined the stimulus activation levels of two antagonist muscles which manipulated the ankle joint of an intact, anesthetized cat. Using visual feedback, the subject manipulated the system to perform positioning tasks which stimulated normal activity of an intact limb. Three controllers were evaluated: open-loop reciprocal control, proportional-differential (PD) closed-loop reciprocal control, and open-loop cocontraction control. The results demonstrated that, in the presence of visual feedback, open-loop cocontraction control compared favorably in performance to that of a PD closed-loop controller. This has a practical value for the implementation of clinical neural prostheses since it suggests that, in some cases feedback transducers may not be required for fine control.<<ETX>>

[1]  U Stanic,et al.  Closed-loop positioning of hemiplegic patient's joint by means of functional electrical stimulation. , 1974, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[2]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[3]  R M Reinking,et al.  A commentary on muscle unit properties in cat hindlimb muscles , 1980, Journal of morphology.

[4]  G. E. Goslow,et al.  The cat step cycle: Hind limb joint angles and muscle lengths during unrestrained locomotion , 1973, Journal of morphology.

[5]  P. H. Peckham,et al.  Closed-Loop Control of Force During Electrical Stimulation of Muscle , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Nonlinear Muscle Length-Tension Curves Affect the Control of Electrically Stimulated Antagonist Muscles , 1986, 1986 American Control Conference.

[7]  T Bajd,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation for control of locomotor systems. , 1981, Critical reviews in bioengineering.

[8]  R. Dum,et al.  Physiological and histochemical characteristics of motor units in cat tibialis anterior and extensor digitorum longus muscles. , 1980, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[9]  Testerman Rl,et al.  Design and evaluation of nerve stimulating electrodes. , 1971 .

[10]  D. Levine,et al.  Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  P. Hunter Peckham,et al.  LINEARIZATION OF AN OPEN LOOP FUNCTIONAL NEUROMUSCULAR STIMULATION SYSTEM THROUGH A PIECEWISE LINEAR APPROXIMATION. , 1983 .

[12]  R. Penn,et al.  Lower Extremity Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation in Cases of Spinal Cord Injury , 1984, Neurosurgery.

[13]  Howard Jay Chizeck,et al.  CONTROL OF GRASP BY FORCE AND POSITION FEEDBACK. , 1986 .

[14]  Howard Jay Chizeck,et al.  ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER FOR REGULATION OF JOINT STIFFNESS BY CO-ACTIVATION OF ANTAGONISTIC MUSCLES. , 1987 .

[15]  R. Close Dynamic properties of mammalian skeletal muscles. , 1972, Physiological reviews.