Improving Accuracy and Power with Transfer Learning Using a Meta-analytic Database

Typical cohorts in brain imaging studies are not large enough for systematic testing of all the information contained in the images. To build testable working hypotheses, investigators thus rely on analysis of previous work, sometimes formalized in a so-called meta-analysis. In brain imaging, this approach underlies the specification of regions of interest (ROIs) that are usually selected on the basis of the coordinates of previously detected effects. In this paper, we propose to use a database of images, rather than coordinates, and frame the problem as transfer learning: learning a discriminant model on a reference task to apply it to a different but related new task. To facilitate statistical analysis of small cohorts, we use a sparse discriminant model that selects predictive voxels on the reference task and thus provides a principled procedure to define ROIs. The benefits of our approach are twofold. First it uses the reference database for prediction, i.e., to provide potential biomarkers in a clinical setting. Second it increases statistical power on the new task. We demonstrate on a set of 18 pairs of functional MRI experimental conditions that our approach gives good prediction. In addition, on a specific transfer situation involving different scanners at different locations, we show that voxel selection based on transfer learning leads to higher detection power on small cohorts.

[1]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis , 1989 .

[2]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[3]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data , 2011, Nature Methods.

[4]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Evaluating the consistency and specificity of neuroimaging data using meta-analysis , 2009, NeuroImage.

[5]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Tso-Jung Yen,et al.  Discussion on "Stability Selection" by Meinshausen and Buhlmann , 2010 .

[7]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Stability selection , 2008, 0809.2932.

[8]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Functional Neuroanatomy of Single-Word Reading: Method and Validation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[9]  Alex J. Sutton,et al.  Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research , 2000 .

[10]  B. Thirion,et al.  Fast reproducible identification and large-scale databasing of individual functional cognitive networks , 2007, BMC Neuroscience.

[11]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  A supervised clustering approach for fMRI-based inference of brain states , 2011, Pattern Recognit..

[12]  James Parker,et al.  on Knowledge and Data Engineering, , 1990 .

[13]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: A comparison of image-based and coordinate-based pooling of studies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[14]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: Statistical and methodological issues for group analyses , 2007, NeuroImage.

[15]  Francis R. Bach,et al.  Self-concordant analysis for logistic regression , 2009, ArXiv.

[16]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  BrainMap , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[17]  Angela M. Uecker,et al.  ALE meta‐analysis: Controlling the false discovery rate and performing statistical contrasts , 2005, Human brain mapping.