Organization of ipsilateral excitatory and inhibitory pathways in the human motor cortex.

Motor cortex stimulation has both excitatory and inhibitory effects on ipsilateral muscles. Excitatory effects can be assessed by ipsilateral motor-evoked potentials (iMEPs). Inhibitory effects include an interruption of ipsilateral voluntary muscle activity known as the silent period (iSP) and a reduction in corticospinal excitability evoked by conditioning stimulation of the contralateral motor cortex (interhemispheric inhibition, IHI). Both iSP and IHI may be mediated by transcallosal pathways. Their relationship to the contralateral corticospinal projection and whether iSP and IHI represent the same phenomenon remain unclear. The neuronal population activated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is highly dependent on the direction of the induced current in the brain. We examined the relationship among iMEP, iSP, IHI, and the contralateral corticospinal system by examining the effects of different stimulus intensities and current directions. Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded from both first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles. The iSP in the right FDI muscle was obtained by right motor cortex stimulation during voluntary muscle contraction. IHI was examined by conditioning stimulation of the right motor cortex followed by test stimulation of the left motor cortex at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 2-80 ms. The induced current directions tested in the right motor cortex were anterior medial (AM), posterior medial (PM), posterior lateral, and anterior lateral (AL). Contralateral MEPs (cMEPs) had the lowest threshold with the AM direction and the shortest latency with the PM direction. iMEPs were present in 8 of 10 subjects. Both iMEP and IHI did not show significant directional preference. iSP was observed in all subjects with the highest threshold for the AL direction and the longest duration for the AM direction. cMEP, iSP, and IHI all increased with stimulus intensity up to approximately 75% stimulator output. Target muscle activation decreased IHI at 8-ms ISI but had little effect on IHI at 40-ms ISI. iSP and IHI at 8-ms ISI did not correlate at any stimulus intensities and current directions tested, and factor analysis showed that they are explained by different factors. However, active IHI at 40-ms ISI was explained by the same factor as iSP. The different directional preference for cMEP compared with iMEP and IHI suggests that these ipsilateral effects are mediated by populations of cortical neurons that are different from those activating the corticospinal neurons. iSP and IHI do not represent the same phenomenon and should be considered complementary measures of ipsilateral inhibition.

[1]  S. Kapur,et al.  Evidence for impaired cortical inhibition in schizophrenia using transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2002, Archives of general psychiatry.

[2]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Synaptic development of the cerebral cortex: implications for learning, memory, and mental illness. , 1994, Progress in brain research.

[3]  M Hallett,et al.  Inhibitory influence of the ipsilateral motor cortex on responses to stimulation of the human cortex and pyramidal tract , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  K Kaneko,et al.  The effect of current direction induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation on the corticospinal excitability in human brain. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  M Hallett,et al.  Dissociation of the pathways mediating ipsilateral and contralateral motor‐evoked potentials in human hand and arm muscles , 1999, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  R R Young,et al.  Human flexor reflexes , 1971, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[7]  B L Day,et al.  Spatial differences in the sites of direct and indirect activation of corticospinal neurones by magnetic stimulation. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  M. Hallett,et al.  Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on ipsilateral muscles , 1991, Neurology.

[9]  M. Wiesendanger,et al.  Transcallosal connections of the distal forelimb representations of the primary and supplementary motor cortical areas in macaque monkeys , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  I. Kanazawa,et al.  Interhemispheric facilitation of the hand motor area in humans , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  P. Mazzone,et al.  Direct demonstration of interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex produced by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  U. Ziemann,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry of transcallosalinhibition in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  B. Meyer,et al.  Inhibitory and excitatory interhemispheric transfers between motor cortical areas in normal humans and patients with abnormalities of the corpus callosum. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  U. Ziemann,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry of transcallosal inhibition in man. , 1995, Experimental brain research.

[15]  B. Payne,et al.  Thalamic and cortical projections to middle suprasylvian cortex of cats: constancy and variation , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  B Boroojerdi,et al.  Transcallosal inhibition and motor conduction studies in patients with schizophrenia using transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1999, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[17]  B. Day,et al.  PHYSIOLOGICAL-STUDIES IN A PATIENT WITH MIRROR MOVEMENTS AND AGENESIS OF THE CORPUS-CALLOSUM , 1991 .

[18]  J C Rothwell,et al.  Comparison of descending volleys evoked by transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in conscious humans. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[19]  S. Röricht,et al.  Abnormal postexcitatory and interhemispheric motor cortex inhibition in writer's cramp , 2001, Journal of Neurology.

[20]  V. Amassian,et al.  Modelling magnetic coil excitation of human cerebral cortex with a peripheral nerve immersed in a brain-shaped volume conductor: the significance of fiber bending in excitation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[21]  J. Rothwell,et al.  A propriospinal-like contribution to electromyographic responses evoked in wrist extensor muscles by transcranial stimulation of the motor cortex in man , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  B. Day,et al.  The effect of magnetic coil orientation on the latency of surface EMG and single motor unit responses in the first dorsal interosseous muscle. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  Babak Boroojerdi,et al.  Transcallosal inhibition in cortical and subcortical cerebral vascular lesions , 1996, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[24]  F. Glocker,et al.  Absence of transcallosal inhibition following focal mangnetic stimulation in preschool children , 1998, Annals of neurology.

[25]  S. Röricht,et al.  Conduction deficits of callosal fibres in early multiple sclerosis , 2000, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[26]  B. Meyer,et al.  First diagnostic applications of transcallosal inhibition in diseases affecting callosal neurones (multiple sclerosis, hydrocephalus, Huntington's disease). , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[27]  M. Ridding,et al.  Reduced interhemispheric inhibition in musicians , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  S. Röricht,et al.  Topography of fibers in the human corpus callosum mediating interhemispheric inhibition between the motor cortices , 1998, Annals of neurology.

[29]  P. Nathan,et al.  Vestibulospinal, reticulospinal and descending propriospinal nerve fibres in man. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  M. Hallett,et al.  Cortical motor representation of the ipsilateral hand and arm , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  A Roby-Brami,et al.  Long-latency spinal reflex in man after flexor reflex afferent stimulation. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  B. Christensen,et al.  The mechanisms of interhemispheric inhibition in the human motor cortex , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  J. Kaas,et al.  The relationship of corpus callosum connections to electrical stimulation maps of motor, supplementary motor, and the frontal eye fields in owl monkeys , 1986, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  B. Day,et al.  Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. , 1992, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  E. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  Evidence for corticospinal excitation of presumed propriospinal neurones in man. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  P. Mazzone,et al.  The effect on corticospinal volleys of reversing the direction of current induced in the motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.