Structure and refinement of penicillopepsin at 1.8 A resolution.

Abstract Penicillopepsin, the aspartyl protease from the mould Penicillium janthinellum , has had its molecular structure refined by a restrained-parameter least-squares procedure at 1.8 A resolution to a conventional R -factor of 0.136. The estimated co-ordinate accuracy for the majority of the 2363 atoms of the enzyme is better than 0.12 A. The average atomic thermal vibration parameter, B , for the atoms of the enzyme is 14.5 A 2 . One determining factor of this low average B value is the large central hydrophobic core, in which there are two prominent clusters of aromatic residues, one of nine, the other of seven residues. The N and C-terminal domains of penicillopepsin display an approximate 2-fold symmetry: 70 residue pairs are topologically equivalent, related by a rotation of 177 ° and a translation of 1.2 A. The analysis of the secondary structural features of the molecule reveals non-linear hydrogen bonding. In penicillopepsin, there is no difference in the mean hydrogen-bond parameters for the elements of α-helix, parallel or antiparallel β-pleated sheet. The mean values for these structural elements are: NO, 2.90 A; NHO, 1.95 A; NĤO, 160 °. The average hydrogen-bond parameters of the reverse β-turns and the 3 10 helices are distinctly different from the above values. The analysis of sidechain conformational angles χ 1 and χ 2 penicillopepsin and other enzyme structures refined in this laboratory shows much narrower distributions as compared with those compiled from unrefined protein structures. The close proximity of the carboxyl groups of Asp33 and Asp213 suggests that they share a proton in a tight hydrogen-bonded environment (Asp33OD2 to Asp213OD1 is 2.87 A). There are several solvent molecules in the active site region and, in particular, O39 forms hydrogen-bonded interactions with both aspartate residues. The disposition of the two carboxyl groups suggests that neither is likely to be involved in a direct nucleophilic attack on the scissile bond of a substrate. The average atomic B -factors of the residues in this region of the molecule are between 5 and 8 A 2 , confirming the proposal that conformational mobility of the active site residues has no role in the enzymatic mechanism. However, conformational mobility of neighbouring regions of the molecule e.g. the “flap” containing Tyr75, is verified by the high B -factors for those residues. The positions of 319 solvent sites per asymmetric unit have been selected from difference electron density maps and refined. Thirteen have been classified as internal, and several of these may have key roles during catalysis. The positively charged N ζ atom of Lys304 forms hydrogen bonds to the carboxylate of Asp14 (internal ion pair) and to two internal water molecules O5 and O25. The protonated side-chain of Asp300 forms a hydrogen bond to Thr214O, 2.78 A, and is the recipient of a hydrogen bond from a surface pocket water molecule O46. There is no possibility for direct interaction between Asp300 and Lys304 without large conformational changes of their environment. The intermolecular packing involves many protein-protein contacts (66 residues) with a large number of solvent molecules involved in bridging between polar residues at the contact surface. The penicillopepsin molecules resemble an approximate hexagonal close-packing of spheres with each molecule having 12 “nearest” neighbours.

[1]  W A Hendrickson,et al.  Radiation damage in protein crystallography. , 1976, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  S. Lifson,et al.  Energy functions for peptides and proteins. I. Derivation of a consistent force field including the hydrogen bond from amide crystals. , 1974, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  S. James,et al.  Enzyme-catalyzed condensation reactions which initiate rapid peptic cleavage of substrates. 1. How the structure of an activating peptide determines its efficiency. , 1981, Biochemistry.

[5]  Michael Levitt,et al.  Refinement of Large Structures by Simultaneous Minimization of Energy and R Factor , 1978 .

[6]  E N Baker,et al.  Structure of actinidin, after refinement at 1.7 A resolution. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  G. Chiericato,et al.  Amino acid sequence of penicillopepsin. IV. Myxobacter AL-1 protease II and Staphylococcus aureus protease fragments and homology with pig pepsin and chymosin. , 1976, Canadian Journal of Biochemistry.

[8]  K. Chen,et al.  Amino acid sequence around the epoxide-reactive residues in pepsin. , 1972, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[9]  J. Knowles,et al.  The effect of arginine modification on the pH dependence of pepsin activity , 1971, FEBS letters.

[10]  P. G. Lenhert,et al.  An adaptable disk-oriented automatic diffractometer control program , 1975 .

[11]  P J Artymiuk,et al.  Refinement of human lysozyme at 1.5 A resolution analysis of non-bonded and hydrogen-bond interactions. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  Cyrus Chothia,et al.  Conformation of twisted β-pleated sheets in proteins , 1973 .

[13]  R. Diamond,et al.  A mathematical model-building procedure for proteins , 1966 .

[14]  R. C. Agarwal A new least‐squares refinement technique based on the fast Fourier transform algorithm: erratum , 1978 .

[15]  D. Peters,et al.  Quantum theory of the structure and bonding in proteins: Part 5. Further studies on the C10 hydrogen bond of the tripeptide , 1980 .

[16]  T. Hofmann,et al.  PROTEOLYTIC ENZYMES OF PENICILLIUM JANTHINELLUM. I. PURIFICATION AND PROPERTIES OF A TRYPSINOGEN-ACTIVATING ENZYME (PEPTIDASE A). , 1964, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[17]  Robert M. Stroud,et al.  The accuracy of refined protein structures: comparison of two independently refined models of bovine trypsin , 1978 .

[18]  E. Baker,et al.  Crystallographic refinement of the structure of actinidin at 1.7 Å resolution by fast Fourier least‐squares methods , 1980 .

[19]  C. Wong,et al.  Structure of acid protease from Endothia parasitica in cross-linked form at 2.45-A resolution. , 1979, Biochemistry.

[20]  L. Delbaere,et al.  Structures of product and inhibitor complexes of Streptomyces griseus protease A at 1.8 A resolution. A model for serine protease catalysis. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  V. Luzzati,et al.  Traitement statistique des erreurs dans la determination des structures cristallines , 1952 .

[22]  L. Delbaere,et al.  Protein structure refinement: Streptomyces griseus serine protease A at 1.8 A resolution. , 1979, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  M. Levitt,et al.  Conformation of amino acid side-chains in proteins. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  T. Blundell,et al.  Four-fold structural repeat in the acid proteases. , 1979, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[25]  S. Phillips,et al.  Structure and refinement of oxymyoglobin at 1.6 A resolution. , 1980, Journal of molecular biology.

[26]  J. Knowles,et al.  Acyl- and amino-transfer routes in pepsin-catalyzed reactions , 1975 .

[27]  D. Cruickshank The required precision of intensity measurements for single‐crystal analysis , 1960 .

[28]  S. D. Dover,et al.  Refinement of bond angles of an α-helix , 1967 .

[29]  L. Delbaere,et al.  Molecular structure of crystalline Streptomyces griseus protease A at 2.8 A resolution. I. Crystallization, data collection and structural analysis. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  Activation of the action of penicillopepsin on leucyl-tyrosyl-amide by a non-substrate peptide and evidence for a conformational change associated with a secondary binding site. , 1974, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[31]  T. Bhat,et al.  An analysis of side-chain conformation in proteins. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[32]  W. Steigemann,et al.  Structure of erythrocruorin in different ligand states refined at 1.4 A resolution. , 1979, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  George M. Church,et al.  A structure-factor least-squares refinement procedure for macromolecular structures using constrained and restrained parameters , 1977 .

[34]  J. S. Rollett,et al.  On the relative scaling of X-ray photographs , 1965 .

[35]  M. James,et al.  Mechanism of acid protease catalysis based on the crystal structure of penicillopepsin , 1977, Nature.

[36]  M. James An X-ray crystallographic approach to enzyme structure and function. , 1980, Canadian journal of biochemistry.

[37]  M. Takahashi,et al.  Evidence for an acyl intermediate in pepsin-catalysed reactions. , 1972, The Biochemical journal.

[38]  S. James,et al.  Enzyme-catalyzed condensation reactions which initiate rapid peptic cleavage of substrates. 2. Proof of mechanism for three examples. , 1981, Biochemistry.

[39]  M. James,et al.  A refinement of the crystal structure of maleic acid , 1974 .

[40]  R. C. Agarwal,et al.  Experience with fast Fourier least squares in the refinement of the crystal structure of rhombohedral 2-zinc insulin at 1.5 Å resolution , 1978 .

[41]  A. Shrake,et al.  Environment and exposure to solvent of protein atoms. Lysozyme and insulin. , 1973, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  M. James,et al.  Penicillopepsin from Penicillium janthinellum crystal structure at 2.8 Å and sequence homology with porcine pepsin , 1977, Nature.

[43]  Bi-Cheng Wang,et al.  Crystallographic computing on an array processor , 1982 .

[44]  J. Sodek,et al.  [25] Microbial acid proteinases , 1970 .

[45]  Lindsay Sawyer,et al.  Carboxyl–carboxylate interactions in proteins , 1982, Nature.

[46]  J. Konnert,et al.  A restrained-parameter structure-factor least-squares refinement procedure for large asymmetric units , 1976 .

[47]  T. T. Wang,et al.  Acyl intermediates in pepsin and penicillopepsin catalyzed reactions. , 1974, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[48]  T. L. Blundell,et al.  Structural evidence for gene duplication in the evolution of the acid proteases , 1978, Nature.

[49]  F. S. Mathews,et al.  A semi-empirical method of absorption correction , 1968 .