A micromodel of voter choice: understanding the dynamics of Australian voter characteristics in a federal election

This study focuses on applying consumer-behavior theory to understand voter characteristics and electoral behavior. The focus is on developing a micromodel that incorporates demographics, voter involvement, political opinion leadership, political knowledge, confidence, and satisfaction. The study was undertaken in an election in Australia for a Federal Lower House of Representatives Seat. Data were gathered from a sample of registered voters, with the results showing strong support for the theory developed. The results indicated strong influences for demographics on voter involvement, resulting in a significant influence of involvement on political opinion leadership. Political opinion leadership was also shown to influence subjective voter knowledge and knowledge impacting on voter decision confidence. The findings also confirmed a strong difference in voter satisfaction depending on voter involvement. The findings have significant implications for political marketing and voter-behavior research. © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  The effect of enduring, situational, and response involvement on preference stability in the context of voting behavior , 1992 .

[2]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Covariation Assessment by Consumers , 1986 .

[3]  Aron O'Cass,et al.  A psychometric evaluation of a revised version of the Lennox and Wolfe revised self-monitoring scale , 2000 .

[4]  M. Zanna,et al.  Direct Experience And Attitude-Behavior Consistency , 1981 .

[5]  M. Laroche,et al.  Brand familiarity and confidence as determinants of purchase intention: An empirical test in a multiple brand context , 1996 .

[6]  William R. Darden,et al.  Mutually Adaptive Effects of Interpersonal Communication , 1971 .

[7]  A. Shama.  Applications of Marketing Concepts to Candidate Marketing , 1975 .

[8]  B. Newman.  An Historical Review of the Voter As a Consumer , 1985 .

[9]  Andrew Lock,et al.  Political marketing ‐ vive la différence! , 1996 .

[10]  S. Beatty,et al.  The involvement--commitment model: Theory and implications , 1988 .

[11]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Individual Differences in Voting Behavior: Further Investigations of Involvement , 1980 .

[12]  Mary L. Carsky,et al.  Grocery shopping behavior A comparison of involved and uninvolved consumers , 1996 .

[13]  William R. Swinyard,et al.  Promotional Effects on a High- Versus Low-Involvement Electorate , 1978 .

[14]  Tuomo Takala,et al.  An alternative view of relationship marketing: a framework for ethical analysis , 1996 .

[15]  L. G. Corey.  People who Claim to be Opinion Leaders: Identifying their Characteristics by Self-report , 1971 .

[16]  H. J. Arnold.  Moderator variables: A clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues , 1982 .

[17]  J. Sheth,et al.  A Model of Primary Voter Behavior , 1985 .

[18]  Peter H. Bloch,et al.  Post-purchase product satisfaction: Incorporating the effects of involvement and time , 1991 .

[19]  Jagdish N. Sheth,et al.  A Theory of Political Choice Behavior , 1987 .

[20]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Political Advertising: A Neglected Policy Issue in Marketing , 1978 .

[21]  J. Sheth,et al.  The “Gender Gap” in Voter Attitudes and Behavior: Some Advertising Implications , 1984 .

[22]  J. Dart,et al.  Measuring market orientation: A multi‐factor, multi‐item approach , 1994 .

[23]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The market maven: A diffuser of marketplace information. , 1987 .

[24]  C. W. Park,et al.  Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics , 1981 .

[25]  P. Butler,et al.  Political Marketing: Structure and Process , 1994 .

[26]  David L. Mothersbaugh,et al.  Consumer Knowledge Assessment , 1994 .

[27]  L. Flynn,et al.  A Short, Reliable Measure of Subjective Knowledge , 1999 .