Anterior Chamber Rebubbling With Perfluoropropane (C3F8) After Failed Rebubbling Attempts for Persistent Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Detachments.

PURPOSE To describe the clinical outcomes of using C3F8 as a tamponade agent for the attachment of partially detached Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts after failure of previous rebubbling attempts. METHODS Interventional case series. We reviewed the medical records of all DMEK surgeries performed at Rabin Medical Center (Petach Tikva, Israel) between January 2016 and December 2018 in which 10% C3F8 tamponade was used for graft reattachments. Patient demographic details, indication for surgery, early postoperative endothelial cell loss, postoperative visual acuity, intraoperative and postoperative complications as well as graft survival were noted. RESULTS Five patients were included in this case series. Indications for DMEK were pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (n = 3), failed penetrating graft (n = 1), and Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (n = 1). In 4 of 5 cases, SF6 tamponade was used at the end of the initial DMEK surgery. In 1 case, air tamponade was used. In all cases, partial graft detachment was seen 1 to 2 weeks postoperatively, and anterior chamber rebubbling was performed using 20% SF6 gas. A second C3F8-assisted rebubbling was performed 10 to 70 days after the primary DMEK surgery. In all cases, complete graft attachment was achieved, and the corneas cleared. Early endothelial cell loss rates averaged at 44% ± 26% (range 20%-74%). One case which had a previous trabeculectomy with chronic preoperative and postoperative hypotony had failed 6 months after surgery. All the other grafts were clear at last visit. CONCLUSIONS Tamponade using nonexpansile 10% C3F8 gas can attach partially detached DMEK grafts after the failure of previous air- or SF6-assisted rebubbling attempts.

[1]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty: Visual Outcomes and Graft Survival , 2018, Cornea.

[2]  I. Bahar,et al.  “PI-less DMEK”: results of Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) without a peripheral iridotomy , 2018, Eye.

[3]  A. Ruzza,et al.  Factors Associated With Early Graft Detachment in Primary Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2018, American journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  Anthony N Kuo,et al.  Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Safety and Outcomes: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[5]  F. Kruse,et al.  Air Versus Sulfur Hexafluoride Gas Tamponade in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Fellow Eye Comparison , 2018, Cornea.

[6]  A. Singh,et al.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty/Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2017, Cornea.

[7]  Laurence E. Frank,et al.  Clinical Outcome of Rebubbling for Graft Detachment After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2017, Cornea.

[8]  I. Bahar,et al.  Comparison of Descemet stripping under continuous air flow, manual air injection and balanced salt solution for DMEK: a pilot study , 2017, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[9]  P. Phillips,et al.  Experienced DSAEK Surgeon's Transition to DMEK: Outcomes Comparing the Last 100 DSAEK Surgeries With the First 100 DMEK Surgeries Exclusively Using Previously Published Techniques , 2016, Cornea.

[10]  Y. Nahum,et al.  Factors Associated With Graft Detachment After Primary Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2017, Cornea.

[11]  I. Dapena,et al.  Midterm Results of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: 4 to 7 Years Clinical Outcome. , 2016, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  L. Cope,et al.  Comparison of 20% sulfur hexafluoride with air for intraocular tamponade in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). , 2016, Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia.

[13]  R. Chuck,et al.  Keratoplasty in the United States: A 10-Year Review from 2005 through 2014. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[14]  S. Schrader,et al.  Komplikationen der Descemetmembran-Endothel-Keratoplastik , 2015, Der Ophthalmologe.

[15]  F. Price,et al.  Evolution of Endothelial Keratoplasty: Where Are We Headed? , 2015, Cornea.

[16]  J. Güell,et al.  Comparison of Sulfur Hexafluoride 20% versus Air Tamponade in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[17]  F. Price,et al.  Air reinjection and endothelial cell density in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: Five‐year follow‐up , 2014, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[18]  U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt,et al.  Graft adhesion in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty dependent on size of removal of host's descemet membrane. , 2014, JAMA ophthalmology.

[19]  R. Chuck,et al.  Non-Descemet Stripping Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2013, Cornea.

[20]  K. Droutsas,et al.  Standardized "no-touch" technique for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[21]  T. Lai,et al.  Intraocular gas in vitreoretinal surgery , 2010 .

[22]  K. Moutsouris,et al.  Graft detachment rate. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[23]  G. Melles,et al.  Preliminary clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  M. Qureshi,et al.  Experience and 12-Month Results of Descemet-Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSEK) with a Small-Incision Technique , 2007, Cornea.

[25]  G. Melles,et al.  Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). , 2006, Cornea.

[26]  D. Coleman,et al.  Perfluorocarbon gases in vitreous surgery. , 1985, Ophthalmology.