From Machine to Machine: An OCT-trained Deep Learning Algorithm for Objective Quantification of Glaucomatous Damage in Fundus Photographs

PURPOSE Previous approaches using deep learning (DL) algorithms to classify glaucomatous damage on fundus photographs have been limited by the requirement for human labeling of a reference training set. We propose a new approach using quantitative spectral-domain (SD) OCT data to train a DL algorithm to quantify glaucomatous structural damage on optic disc photographs. DESIGN Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS A total of 32 820 pairs of optic disc photographs and SD OCT retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) scans from 2312 eyes of 1198 participants. METHODS The sample was divided randomly into validation plus training (80%) and test (20%) sets, with randomization performed at the patient level. A DL convolutional neural network was trained to assess optic disc photographs and predict SD OCT average RNFL thickness. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The DL algorithm performance was evaluated in the test sample by evaluating correlation and agreement between the predictions and actual SD OCT measurements. We also assessed the ability to discriminate eyes with glaucomatous visual field loss from healthy eyes with area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS The mean prediction of average RNFL thickness from all 6292 optic disc photographs in the test set was 83.3±14.5 μm, whereas the mean average RNFL thickness from all corresponding SD OCT scans was 82.5±16.8 μm (P = 0.164). There was a very strong correlation between predicted and observed RNFL thickness values (Pearson r = 0.832; R2 = 69.3%; P < 0.001), with mean absolute error of the predictions of 7.39 μm. The area under the ROC curves for discriminating glaucomatous from healthy eyes with the DL predictions and actual SD OCT average RNFL thickness measurements were 0.944 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.912-0.966) and 0.940 (95% CI, 0.902-0.966), respectively (P = 0.724). CONCLUSIONS We introduced a novel DL approach to assess fundus photographs and provide quantitative information about the amount of neural damage that can be used to diagnose and stage glaucoma. In addition, training neural networks to predict SD OCT data objectively represents a new approach that overcomes limitations of human labeling and could be useful in other areas of ophthalmology.

[1]  Peter J. Bex,et al.  Artificial Intelligence Classification of Central Visual Field Patterns in Glaucoma. , 2019, Ophthalmology.

[2]  Sayan Mukherjee,et al.  Estimating Rates of Progression and Predicting Future Visual Fields in Glaucoma Using a Deep Variational Autoencoder , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[3]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Detecting Structural Progression in Glaucoma with Optical Coherence Tomography. , 2017, Ophthalmology.

[4]  R. Noecker,et al.  Teleophthalmology assessment of diabetic retinopathy fundus images: smartphone versus standard office computer workstation. , 2012, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[5]  David W Wright,et al.  Nonmydriatic digital ocular fundus photography on the iPhone 3G: the FOTO-ED study. , 2012, Archives of ophthalmology.

[6]  A. Tafreshi,et al.  Diagnosing preperimetric glaucoma with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[7]  Susan M. Wakil,et al.  Human versus Machine: Comparing a Deep Learning Algorithm to Human Gradings for Detecting Glaucoma on Fundus Photographs. , 2019, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Comparison of different spectral domain OCT scanning protocols for diagnosing preperimetric glaucoma. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  W. Cleveland Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[10]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  H. Rao,et al.  Ability of different scanning protocols of spectral domain optical coherence tomography to diagnose preperimetric glaucoma. , 2013, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  M. He,et al.  Efficacy of a Deep Learning System for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Based on Color Fundus Photographs. , 2018, Ophthalmology.

[13]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Estimating Lead Time Gained by Optical Coherence Tomography in Detecting Glaucoma before Development of Visual Field Defects. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[14]  A. Sommer,et al.  Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in measurement of optic disc characteristics. , 1988, Ophthalmology.

[15]  Yusuke Arai,et al.  Applying artificial intelligence to disease staging: Deep learning for improved staging of diabetic retinopathy , 2017, PloS one.

[16]  E. O'Neill,et al.  Glaucomatous optic neuropathy evaluation (GONE) project: the effect of monoscopic versus stereoscopic viewing conditions on optic nerve evaluation. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  Manoj Raju,et al.  Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Automatic Diagnosis of Diabetic Retinopathy , 2017, MedInfo.

[18]  I. Scott,et al.  Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. , 1992, Ophthalmology.

[19]  Shirley Dex,et al.  JR 旅客販売総合システム(マルス)における運用及び管理について , 1991 .

[20]  W. M. Grant,et al.  Why do some people go blind from glaucoma? , 1982, Ophthalmology.

[21]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[22]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[23]  M. Wilson,et al.  Race, ethnicity and prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 2006, Journal of the National Medical Association.

[24]  Young Kook Kim,et al.  Macular Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness Prediction from Red-free Fundus Photography using Hybrid Deep Learning Model , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[25]  M. Shanmugam,et al.  Fundus imaging with a mobile phone: A review of techniques , 2014, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  E. Finkelstein,et al.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for Diabetic Retinopathy and Related Eye Diseases Using Retinal Images From Multiethnic Populations With Diabetes , 2017, JAMA.

[27]  Abhishek Das,et al.  Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization , 2016, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[28]  Gadi Wollstein,et al.  Clinical Utility of Optical Coherence Tomography in Glaucoma , 2016, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  A. Tafreshi,et al.  Agreement among spectral-domain optical coherence tomography instruments for assessing retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[30]  A. Sommer,et al.  Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. , 1991, JAMA.

[31]  Subhashini Venugopalan,et al.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs. , 2016, JAMA.

[32]  Susan Vitale,et al.  Agreement among glaucoma specialists in assessing progressive disc changes from photographs in open-angle glaucoma patients. , 2009, American journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  Fei-Fei Li,et al.  ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[34]  R. Harwerth,et al.  Agreement between Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measures from Spectralis and Cirrus Spectral Domain OCT , 2012, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[35]  A. Sommer,et al.  Race and primary open-angle glaucoma. , 1985, American journal of ophthalmology.

[36]  W. M. Grant,et al.  Race as a risk factor for progressive glaucomatous damage. , 1985, Annals of ophthalmology.

[37]  F. Medeiros,et al.  A statistical approach to the evaluation of covariate effects on the receiver operating characteristic curves of diagnostic tests in glaucoma. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[38]  Robert N. Weinreb,et al.  Retinal nerve fiber layer imaging with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a variability and diagnostic performance study. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[39]  An Ran Ran,et al.  Artificial intelligence deep learning algorithm for discriminating ungradable optical coherence tomography three-dimensional volumetric optic disc scans , 2019, Neurophotonics.

[40]  F. Medeiros,et al.  The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. , 2014, JAMA.

[41]  Richard A. Russell,et al.  Latanoprost for open-angle glaucoma (UKGTS): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.