National Validation Study of a Cellulose Sponge Wipe-Processing Method for Use after Sampling Bacillus anthracis Spores from Surfaces

ABSTRACT This work was initiated to address the gaps identified by Congress regarding validated biothreat environmental sampling and processing methods. Nine Laboratory Response Network-affiliated laboratories participated in a validation study of a cellulose sponge wipe-processing protocol for the recovery, detection, and quantification of viable Bacillus anthracis Sterne spores from steel surfaces. Steel coupons (645.16 cm2) were inoculated with 1 to 4 log10 spores and then sampled with cellulose sponges (Sponge-Stick; 3M, St. Paul, MN). Surrogate dust and background organisms were added to the sponges to mimic environmental conditions. Labs processed the sponges according to the provided protocol. Sensitivity, specificity, and mean percent recovery (%R), between-lab variability, within-lab variability, and total percent coefficient of variation were calculated. The mean %R (standard error) of spores from the surface was 32.4 (4.4), 24.4 (2.8), and 30.1 (2.3) for the 1-, 2-, and 4-log10 inoculum levels, respectively. Sensitivities for colony counts were 84.1%, 100%, and 100% for the 1-, 2-, and 4-log10 inocula, respectively. These data help to characterize the variability of the processing method and thereby enhance confidence in the interpretation of the results of environmental sampling conducted during a B. anthracis contamination investigation.

[1]  Patricia Cruz,et al.  Evaluation of the Biological Sampling Kit (BiSKit) for Large-Area Surface Sampling , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[2]  K. Jarman,et al.  Evaluation of sampling tools for environmental sampling of bacterial endospores from porous and nonporous surfaces , 2008, Journal of applied microbiology.

[3]  Heather O'Connell,et al.  National validation study of a swab protocol for the recovery of Bacillus anthracis spores from surfaces. , 2010, Journal of microbiological methods.

[4]  Paul A. Baron,et al.  Recovery Efficiency and Limit of Detection of Aerosolized Bacillus anthracis Sterne from Environmental Surface Samples , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  Erica R. Valdes,et al.  Surface Sampling of Spores in Dry-Deposition Aerosols , 2008, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[6]  L. J. Rose,et al.  Evaluation of a Macrofoam Swab Protocol for the Recovery of Bacillus anthracis Spores from a Steel Surface , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[7]  D. Kleinbaum,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods , 1978 .

[8]  John E. Brockmann,et al.  Evaluation of a Wipe Surface Sample Method for Collection of Bacillus Spores from Nonporous Surfaces , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[9]  Alexander J. Probst,et al.  Validation of a Nylon-Flocked-Swab Protocol for Efficient Recovery of Bacterial Spores from Smooth and Rough Surfaces , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  Rafał Lewandowski,et al.  Use of a Foam Spatula for Sampling Surfaces after Bioaerosol Deposition , 2009, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[11]  Misty J. Hein,et al.  Surface Sampling Methods for Bacillus anthracis Spore Contamination , 2002, Emerging infectious diseases.

[12]  Patricia Cruz,et al.  Evaluation of Two Surface Sampling Methods for Detection of Erwinia herbicola on a Variety of Materials by Culture and Quantitative PCR , 2007, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  Tanja Popovic,et al.  Evaluation and Validation of a Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Rapid Identification of Bacillus anthracis , 2002, Emerging infectious diseases.

[14]  J. Brockmann,et al.  Evaluation of rayon swab surface sample collection method for Bacillus spores from nonporous surfaces , 2007, Journal of applied microbiology.

[15]  ANTHRAX DETECTION Agencies Need to Validate Sampling Activities in Order to Increase Confidence in Negative Results , 2005 .

[16]  Bette Jensen,et al.  Swab Materials and Bacillus anthracis Spore Recovery from Nonporous Surfaces , 2004, Emerging infectious diseases.

[17]  James M Robertson,et al.  Recovery Efficiencies of Anthrax Spores and Ricin from Nonporous or Nonabsorbent and Porous or Absorbent Surfaces by a Variety of Sampling Methods * , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[18]  R. Bull,et al.  Heat activation/shock temperatures for Bacillus anthracis spores and the issue of spore plate counts versus true numbers of spores. , 2007, Journal of microbiological methods.