ComPLuS model: A new insight in pupils' collaborative talk, actions and balance during a computer-mediated music task

This exploratory work describes and analyses the collaborative interactions that emerge during computer-based music composition in the primary school. The study draws on socio-cultural theories of learning, originated within Vygotsky's theoretical context, and proposes a new model, namely Computer-mediated Praxis and Logos under Synergy (ComPLuS). In this model, peers' dialogue is categorised into five types; disputational, cumulative, exploratory, operational, and reflective, with each one corresponding to different types of spoken contributions. Moreover, peers' actions are categorised as individual or joint and are used to evaluate the effect of computer mediation on the collaborative activity and its balance within a pair. The potential and effectiveness of the realisation of the ComPLuS model in practice, as far as peers' collaboration is concerned, are evaluated from its trialling in an experimental case-study, in which a group of 11-yr old pupils worked in pairs to compose short melodies using computers at the computer room of their school. Emphasis was placed upon the types of social modes of thinking with regard to pupils' spoken contributions and talk types during their conversation; pupils' actions when manipulating software, and the balance of talk and action between the pair members. Their ongoing peer-to-peer communication and actions formed the research data. A mixed (qualitative and quantitative) analysis revealed that peers usually adopted cumulative and exploratory talk. Moreover, the action type which dominated their work was based on a consensual decision. Nevertheless, it was found that lead on collaborative talk does not mean lead on joint action and does not always sustain a balance in peers' collaboration. Experimentation with the music software, in conjunction with pupils' musical background, facilitated their joint action, exploratory and reflective talk. However, audio feedback provided by the software did not seem to affect peers' talk types. These results suggest that the ComPLuS model captures the characteristics of peers' collaborative interactions during their shared discussions and actions, and can lead to a better understanding of the nature of computer-supported collaborative creativity in primary music education.

[1]  J. Roschelle Learning by Collaborating: Convergent Conceptual Change , 1992 .

[2]  Karen Littleton,et al.  Learning with computers: analysing productive interaction , 1999 .

[3]  Nm Breeze,et al.  Music and eJay: An opportunity for creative collaborations in the classroom , 2008 .

[4]  Gordon Wells,et al.  The Meaning Makers: Children Learning Language and Using Language to Learn. First Edition. , 1985 .

[5]  John P. Keeves,et al.  Educational research, methodology and measurement : an international handbook , 1988 .

[6]  Liz Mellor,et al.  Creativity, originality, identity: investigating computer-based composition in the secondary school , 2008 .

[7]  Keith Punch,et al.  Introduction to Social Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches , 1998 .

[8]  Neil Mercer,et al.  The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners , 1995 .

[9]  I. Xenakis,et al.  Formalized Music: Thought and Mathematics in Composition , 1971 .

[10]  Pamela Burnard,et al.  Reframing creativity and technology: promoting pedagogic change in music education , 2007 .

[11]  Renata Tesch,et al.  Qualitative research : analysis types and software tools , 1990 .

[12]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[13]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Group cognition in computer-assisted collaborative learning , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[14]  Magne Espeland,et al.  Compositional process as discourse and interaction : a study of small group music composition processes in a school context , 2007 .

[15]  Sofia J. Hadjileontiadou,et al.  Lin2k: A Novel Web‐Based Collaborative Tool‐Application to Engineering Education , 2003 .

[16]  Stephanie D. Teasley Constructing a Joint Problem Space: The Computer as a Tool for Sharing Knowledge , 1993 .

[17]  M. Azmitia,et al.  Peer interactive minds: Developmental, theoretical, and methodological issues , 1996 .

[18]  Avril Loveless,et al.  Literature Review in Creativity, New Technologies and Learning , 2002 .

[19]  RUPERT WEGERIF,et al.  Using computers to help coach exploratory talk across the curriculum , 1996, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Janet Mills,et al.  Music technology inspected: good teaching in Key Stage 3 , 2000, British Journal of Music Education.

[21]  Michael Corr,et al.  Getting it Together , 1972 .

[22]  Mark Steedman,et al.  Animated conversation: rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture & spoken intonation for multiple conversational agents , 1994, SIGGRAPH.

[23]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[24]  Richard Cox,et al.  Why observing a dialogue may benefit learning , 1998, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[25]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[26]  U. Staudinger,et al.  Interactive minds : life-span perspectives on the social foundation of cognition , 1996 .

[27]  Elizabeth Sulzby,et al.  The Nature of Children's Interactions while Composing Together on Computers. CIERA Report. , 1999 .

[28]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[29]  Karen A. Cole Equity issues in computer-based collaboration: looking beyond surface indicators , 1995, CSCL.

[30]  J. M. Atkinson Structures of Social Action: Contents , 1985 .

[31]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks , 1999 .

[32]  Margarita María Peón Zapata,et al.  Exploratory Talk, Argumentation and Reasoning in Mexican Primary School Children , 2004 .

[33]  N. Mercer The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom , 1996, Language and the Joint Creation of Knowledge.

[34]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[35]  Dorothy Miell,et al.  Children’s Creative Collaborations: The Importance of Friendship when Working Together on a Musical Composition , 2000 .

[36]  Tim Cain,et al.  Theory, technology and the music curriculum , 2004, British Journal of Music Education.

[37]  C. Crook Computers and the Collaborative Experience of Learning , 1996 .

[38]  Bruce C. Straits,et al.  Approaches to social research , 1993 .

[39]  M. Boden The creative mind : myths & mechanisms , 1991 .

[40]  Ann C. Jones,et al.  Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[41]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  The evolution of research on collaborative learning , 1996 .

[42]  Pamela Burnard,et al.  Investigating children's musical interactions within the activities systems of group composing and arranging: An application of Engeström's Activity Theory , 2008 .

[43]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[44]  Esma Aïmeur Application and Assessment of Cognitive-dissonance Theory in the Learning Process , 1998, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[45]  L. Vygotsky,et al.  Thought and Language , 1963 .

[46]  Nikolaos Avouris,et al.  Modelling interaction during small-group synchronous problem-solving activities: The Synergo approach . , 2004 .

[47]  Paul R. Kinnear,et al.  SPSS for Windows made simple : release 10 , 2001 .

[48]  B. Rogoff Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship , 1995 .

[49]  Rupert Wegerif,et al.  Thinking and Learning with ICT: Raising Achievement in Primary Classrooms , 2004 .

[50]  David J. Silverman,et al.  Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook , 1999 .

[51]  J. Hamel,et al.  Case Study Methods , 1993 .

[52]  Ed Smeets,et al.  Does ICT contribute to powerful learning environments in primary education? , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[53]  Herbert C. Kelman,et al.  Ethical issues in different social science methods , 1982 .

[54]  Benedict du Boulay,et al.  Implementation of motivational tactics in tutoring systems , 1995 .

[55]  Sam Glucksberg,et al.  The Development of Communication: Competence as a Function of Age. , 1969 .

[56]  M. Bassey Case study research in educational settings , 1999 .

[57]  Neil Mercer,et al.  Words and Minds : How We Use Language to Think Together , 2000 .

[58]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[59]  N. Mercer,et al.  Methods for studying the processes of interaction and collaborative activity in computer-based educational activities , 2004 .

[60]  Judith Kleine Staarman,et al.  Face-to-face talk to support computer- mediated discussion in a primary school literacy practice , 2003 .