Establishment of vegetation in broadened field boundaries in agricultural landscapes

Three field experiments with broadened permanent field boundaries were established in agricultural landscapes near Uppsala (southern Sweden). One aim was to test methods for increasing the amount of non-cultivated areas with high plant species diversity and at the same time suppressing the occurrence of weeds. The treatments consisted of re-establishing or broadening boundary strips, sowing a mixture of ley grasses and clover, of wild meadow species, or planting bushes. All treatments were managed by yearly mowing and taking away of the plant material. The vegetation was examined on two occasions during a 10-year period. At the second occasion, a set of untreated field boundaries (reference boundaries) in the vicinity of each experiment was examined for comparison. Sowing meadow species changed the species composition substantially compared to untreated boundaries. Out of 32 sown species, 22 remained after 10 years. These species are normally found in well-managed meadows or pastures. Species that did not establish or disappeared tended to be either adapted to moist or to dry conditions. Sowing meadow species kept the abundance of weeds on a lower level than sowing clover and grasses or free regeneration at one site and kept weed abundance lower or at least not higher than in reference boundaries.

[1]  D. Kleijn.  Species richness and weed abundance in the vegetation of arable field boundaries , 1997 .

[2]  J. W. Gilliam,et al.  Sediment and Chemical Load Reduction by Grass and Riparian Filters , 1996 .

[3]  J. Lagerlöf,et al.  The importance of field boundaries for earthworms (Lumbricidae) in the Swedish agricultural landscape , 2002 .

[4]  J. Lagerlöf,et al.  Margins of agricultural fields as habitats for pollinating insects , 1992 .

[5]  Ann-Christin Weibull,et al.  Species richness in agroecosystems: the effect of landscape, habitat and farm management , 2003, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[6]  M. Ihse,et al.  Swedish agricultural landscapes : patterns and changes during the last 50 years, studied by aerial photos , 1995 .

[7]  G. D. Snoo,et al.  Effect of herbicide drift on adjacent boundary vegetation , 1999 .

[8]  D. Macdonald,et al.  Uncropped edges of arable fields managed for biodiversity do not increase weed occurrence in adjacent crops , 1999 .

[9]  D. Coombes,et al.  The dispersal and distribution of polyphagous predatory Coleoptera in cereals , 1986 .

[10]  J. Banaszak.  Strategy for conservation of wild bees in an agricultural landscape , 1992 .

[11]  T S Persson.  MANAGEMENT OF ROADSIDE VERGES: VEGETATION CHANGES AND SPECIES DIVERSITY , 1995 .

[12]  J. Lagerlöf,et al.  The abundance of arthropods along two field margins with different types of vegetation composition: an experimental study , 1993 .

[13]  B. Svensson.  Foraging and nesting ecology of bumblebees (Bombus Spp.) in agricultural landscapes in Sweden , 2002 .

[14]  Th. O. B. N. Krok,et al.  Svensk flora : fanerogamer och ormbunksväxter , 1984 .

[15]  T. J. Breen,et al.  Biostatistical Analysis (2nd ed.). , 1986 .

[16]  S. Hinsley,et al.  Breeding birds in field boundaries in an agricultural landscape , 1996 .