Real-Time Dynamic Substructuring Testing of a Bridge Equipped with Friction-Based Seismic Isolators

This paper presents a real-time dynamic substructuring (RTDS) test program that was carried out on a bridge structure equipped with seismic isolators with self-centering and friction energy dissipation capabilities. The structure studied also included bearing units with sliding interfaces providing additional energy dissipation capacity. In the RTDS tests, the seismic isolator was physically tested in the laboratory by using a high performance dynamic structural actuator imposing, in real time, the displacement time-histories obtained from numerical simulations that were run in parallel. The integration scheme used in the test program was the Rosenbrock-W variant and the integration was performed by using the MathWorks’s Simulink and an XPC target computer environment. The numerical counterpart included the bridge piers and the additional energy dissipation properties. The nonlinear response of these components was accounted for in the numerical models. The RTDS tests were performed in the direction parallel to the length of the bridge. The effects of various ground motions and the influence of modeling assumptions such as friction and column stiffness were investigated. Finally, the test results were compared to the predictions from dynamic time-history analyses performed by using commercially available computer programs. The results indicate that simple numerical modeling techniques can lead to an accurate prediction of the displacement response of the bridge seismic protective systems studied.

[1]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Seismic isolation of bridges using isolation systems based on flat sliding bearings , 2007 .

[2]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Development of real‐time pseudo dynamic testing , 1992 .

[3]  P. Benson Shing,et al.  Performance evaluation of a real‐time pseudodynamic test system , 2006 .

[4]  Oreste S. Bursi,et al.  Evaluation of some implicit time-stepping algorithms for pseudodynamic tests , 1996 .

[5]  Pierre Léger,et al.  Comparison between real-time dynamic substructuring and shake table testing techniques for nonlinear seismic applications , 2010 .

[6]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Comparative Study of the Inelastic Seismic Demand of Eastern and Western Canadian Sites , 2001 .

[7]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Performance of steel bridges during the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu (Kobe, Japan) earthquake , 1996 .

[8]  Nathalie Roy,et al.  Performance-based seismic retrofit of a bridge bent: Design and experimental validation , 2010 .

[9]  Raouf A. Ibrahim,et al.  Recent advances in nonlinear passive vibration isolators , 2008 .

[10]  Martin S. Williams,et al.  Compensation of actuator dynamics in real-time hybrid tests , 2007 .

[11]  Arthur J. Helmicki,et al.  Cable-Stayed Bridges: Case Study for Ambient Vibration-Based Cable Tension Estimation , 2012 .

[12]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges , 1996 .

[13]  G. Magonette,et al.  Pseudo‐dynamic testing of bridges using non‐linear substructuring , 2004 .

[14]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Real-Time Error Monitoring for Hybrid Simulation. Part I: Methodology and Experimental Verification , 2007 .

[15]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Frictional Response of PTFE Sliding Bearings at High Frequencies , 1997 .

[16]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  A Rosenbrock‐W method for real‐time dynamic substructuring and pseudo‐dynamic testing , 2009 .

[17]  Hideki Fujii,et al.  Verification of real-time hybrid tests of response control of base isolation system by MR damper comparing shaking table tests , 2008, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[18]  Richard Christenson,et al.  Large-Scale Experimental Verification of Semiactive Control through Real-Time Hybrid Simulation , 2008 .