Long-term Performance of Warm-season Turfgrass Species under Municipal Irrigation Frequency Restrictions

Landscape irrigation frequency restrictions are commonly imposed by water purveyors and municipalities to curtail domestic water use and to ensure adequate water supplies for growing populations during times of drought. Currently, published data are lacking concerning irrigation frequency requirements necessary for sustaining acceptable levels of turfgrass quality of commonly used warm-season turfgrass species. The objective of this 3-year field study was to determine comparative turfgrass quality of drought-resistant cultivars of four warm-season lawn species in the south–central United States under irrigation frequency regimes of 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8× monthly. Turfgrasses used in the study were based on previously reported drought resistance and included ‘Riley’s Super Sport’ (Celebration®) bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.], ‘Palisades’ zoysiagrass (Zoysia japonica Steud.), ‘Floratam’ st. augustinegrass [Stenotaphrum secundatum (Walt.) Kuntze], and ‘SeaStar’ seashore paspalum (Paspalum vaginatum Swartz). During each growing season, slightly reduced irrigation volumes and bypassed events resulted from the 8× monthly treatment (34.95 cm, 38.13 cm, and 27.33 cm) compared with the 4× monthly treatment (35.36 cm, 40.84 cm, and 28.70 cm) in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For the once weekly treatment, the average fraction of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) supplied by effective rainfall and irrigation during the summer months was 1.22, 0.67, and 0.83 in years 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and was generally adequate to support acceptable turfgrass quality of all warm-season turfgrasses evaluated. Under the less than weekly irrigation frequency, st. augustinegrass and seashore paspalum generally fell to below acceptable quality levels because the average fraction of ETo supplied by effective rainfall and irrigation during the summer months of years 2 and 3 was 0.51, 0.39, and 0.26 for the 2× monthly, 1× monthly, and unirrigated treatments, respectively. Bermudagrass generally outperformed all other species under the most restrictive irrigation frequencies and also did not differ statistically from zoysiagrass. These results show that as irrigation frequency is restricted to less than once per week, species selection becomes an important consideration.

[1]  D. Bremer,et al.  Minimum water requirements of Japanese lawngrass for survival during prolonged drought , 2020, Crop Science.

[2]  A. Chandra,et al.  Drought response and minimal water requirements of diploid and interploid St. Augustinegrass under progressive drought stress , 2020 .

[3]  Diane E. Boellstorff,et al.  A Survey of Public Perceptions and Attitudes about Water Availability Following Exceptional Drought in Texas , 2019, Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education.

[4]  M. Leclerc,et al.  Drought Performance and Physiological Responses of Bermudagrass and Seashore Paspalum , 2019, Crop Science.

[5]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Drought Avoidance Traits in a Collection of Zoysiagrasses , 2018, HortScience.

[6]  J. Aitkenhead-Peterson,et al.  Historical ETo-based irrigation scheduling for St. Augustinegrass Lawns in the South-Central United States , 2017, Irrigation Science.

[7]  A. Milman,et al.  Policy Frameworks Influencing Outdoor Water‐use Restrictions , 2016 .

[8]  C. Polsky,et al.  Lawn enforcement: How municipal policies and neighborhood norms influence homeowner residential landscape management , 2016 .

[9]  James C. Thomas,et al.  Deficit Irrigation and Simulated Traffic on ‘Tifway’ Bermudagrass Summer Performance and Autumn Recovery , 2016 .

[10]  Michael D. Dukes,et al.  Consumptive water use and crop coefficients for warm-season turfgrass species in the Southeastern United States , 2015 .

[11]  A. Chandra,et al.  Supplemental Irrigation Requirements of Zoysiagrass and Bermudagrass Cultivars , 2014 .

[12]  Kamal Alsharif,et al.  The effectiveness of water irrigation policies for residential turfgrass , 2013 .

[13]  Brad Vogus LibGuides: Government Documents - Executive Branch - Department of Agriculture: Natural Resources Conservation Service , 2012 .

[14]  John A. Knox,et al.  The 2007‐2009 Drought in Athens, Georgia, United States: A Climatological Analysis and an Assessment of Future Water Availability 1 , 2012 .

[15]  James C. Thomas,et al.  Bermudagrass and Buffalograss Drought Response and Recovery at Two Soil Depths , 2011 .

[16]  James C. Thomas,et al.  Drought Response and Recovery Characteristics of St. Augustinegrass Cultivars , 2010 .

[17]  Jack C. Kiefer,et al.  Appropriate design and evaluation of water use and conservation metrics and benchmarks , 2010 .

[18]  Bruce J. Lesikar,et al.  Efficient Water Use in Residential Urban Landscapes , 2008 .

[19]  T. Steinberg American Green: The Obsessive Quest for the Perfect Lawn , 2006 .

[20]  P. Mayer Residential End Uses of Water , 1999 .

[21]  M. C. Engelke,et al.  Performance of Five Turfgrasses under Linear Gradient Irrigation , 1999 .

[22]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[23]  D. D. Baumann,et al.  Urban Water Demand Management and Planning , 1997 .

[24]  R. Carrow Drought Resistance Aspects of Turfgrasses in the Southeast: Root‐Shoot Responses , 1996 .

[25]  R. Carrow Drought resistance aspects of turfgrasses in the Southeast : evapotranspiration and crop coefficients , 1995 .

[26]  L. A. Knochenmus,et al.  Potentiometric surface of the upper Floridan aquifer, west-central Florida, September 1990; prepared in cooperation with the Southwest Florida Water Management District , 1991 .

[27]  R. Emmons Turfgrass Science and Management , 1984 .