Machine Learning-based CPS for Clustering High throughput Machining Cycle Conditions

Abstract Cyber-physical systems (CPS) have opened up a wide range of opportunities in terms of performance analysis that can be applied directly to the machine tool industry and are useful for maintenance systems and machine designers. High-speed communication capabilities enable the data to be gathered, pre-processed and processed for the purpose of machine diagnosis. This paper describes a complete real-world CPS implementation cycle, ranging from machine data acquisition to processing and interpretation. In fact, the aim of this paper is to propose a CPS for machine component knowledge discovery based on clustering algorithms using real data from a machining process. Therefore, it compares three clustering algorithms –k-means, hierarchical agglomerative and Gaussian mixture models– in terms of their contribution to spindle performance knowledge during high throughput machining operation.

[1]  J. H. Ward Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[2]  Yanyang Zi,et al.  A Two-Stage Data-Driven-Based Prognostic Approach for Bearing Degradation Problem , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[3]  H. B. Barlow,et al.  Unsupervised Learning , 1989, Neural Computation.

[4]  Noureddine Zerhouni,et al.  CNC machine tool's wear diagnostic and prognostic by using dynamic Bayesian networks , 2012 .

[5]  André Hardy,et al.  An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set , 1994 .

[6]  Jack Bieker,et al.  Data mining solves tough semiconductor manufacturing problems , 2000, KDD '00.

[7]  Helen Gill,et al.  Cyber-Physical Systems , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics (ICM).

[8]  Yingjie Tian,et al.  A Comprehensive Survey of Clustering Algorithms , 2015, Annals of Data Science.

[9]  Geoffrey I. Webb,et al.  Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining , 2018, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[10]  T. W. Liao,et al.  Detection of welding flaws from radiographic images with fuzzy clustering methods , 1999, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[11]  Jay Lee,et al.  A prognostic algorithm for machine performance assessment and its application , 2004 .

[12]  Jay Lee,et al.  Service Innovation and Smart Analytics for Industry 4.0 and Big Data Environment , 2014 .

[13]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Data mining in manufacturing: a review based on the kind of knowledge , 2009, J. Intell. Manuf..

[14]  Anil K. Jain Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[15]  John T. Roth,et al.  Monitoring and diagnosis of bearing defects using data dependent systems , 1996 .

[16]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[17]  Xue Z. Wang,et al.  Knowledge discovery from process operational data using PCA and fuzzy clustering , 2001 .

[18]  H.A. Toliyat,et al.  Condition Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis of Electrical Motors—A Review , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[19]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[20]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[21]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  Unsupervised Learning , 2018, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[22]  G. W. Milligan,et al.  An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a data set , 1985 .

[23]  Yan Jin,et al.  DAKA: design activity knowledge acquisition through data-mining , 2006 .

[24]  Wen-Chih Wang,et al.  Data mining for yield enhancement in semiconductor manufacturing and an empirical study , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[25]  อนิรุธ สืบสิงห์,et al.  Data Mining Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques , 2014 .

[26]  Sergei Vassilvitskii,et al.  k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding , 2007, SODA '07.