Accuracy of vegetation height and terrain elevation derived from ICESat/GLAS in forested areas

Abstract This paper focuses on accuracy assessment of canopy top elevation, ground elevation and vegetation height (VH) derived from space borne full-waveform LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data across forested areas. Computed height metrics from LiDAR data which were acquired by the GLAS sensor aboard the ICESat (Ice Cloud and land Elevation Satellite) are compared against airborne laser scanning (ALS) based digital elevation models. Due to the dynamic topography of the sites under investigation, a wide range of slope angles could be investigated. ICESat's raw waveform data (GLA01) and the land surface altimetry data (GLA14) products are used to determine height metrics with different methods. GLA14 based elevation and vegetation heights are computed from range offset information. Values are provided for signal begin, signal end, land range and up to six Gaussian peaks for each received waveform. GLA01 based terrain heights are computed by locally weighted polynomial regression and peak detection on the received waveform itself. A range of different smoothing spans and noise threshold values on the original waveform, which is represented by 544 single values (bins), were tested. A new method based on the unsmoothed waveform was developed for the detection of the signal begin. By detecting the location above the noise threshold, where the signal rises at least for 5 bins (75 cm), achieved more precise results, than the given signal begin in the GLA14 product. For ground peak detection by smoothing of the waveform it was found that noise thresholds of 4 and 4.5 times the standard deviation plus the mean noise level give the best performance. For VH computation in areas of up to 10° terrain slope, a smoothing span of 10 bins achieved r2 = 0.58, whereas the GLA14 based method achieved r2 of 0.75 in flat terrain (0–5°). For these flat areas, best results in VH computation (r2 = 0.91) were achieved by using the new method for canopy top detection and the GLA14 based ground elevations. Determination of terrain elevations was observed to be best by computation with GLA14 based parameters. The stronger of second last two peaks was found to be closest to the ground level elevation.

[1]  S. Popescu,et al.  Satellite lidar vs. small footprint airborne lidar: Comparing the accuracy of aboveground biomass estimates and forest structure metrics at footprint level , 2011 .

[2]  S. Los,et al.  Uncertainty within satellite LiDAR estimations of vegetation and topography , 2010 .

[3]  Juilson Jubanski,et al.  ICESat/GLAS Data as a Measurement Tool for Peatland Topography and Peat Swamp Forest Biomass in Kalimantan, Indonesia , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[4]  Philip Lewis,et al.  A threshold insensitive method for locating the forest canopy top with waveform lidar , 2011 .

[5]  R. K. Dixon,et al.  Carbon Pools and Flux of Global Forest Ecosystems , 1994, Science.

[6]  R. Nelson,et al.  Regional aboveground forest biomass using airborne and spaceborne LiDAR in Québec. , 2008 .

[7]  K. Ranson,et al.  Forest vertical structure from GLAS : An evaluation using LVIS and SRTM data , 2008 .

[8]  Barbara Koch,et al.  Status and future of laser scanning, synthetic aperture radar and hyperspectral remote sensing data for forest biomass assessment , 2010 .

[9]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[10]  W. Cleveland.  Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[11]  G. Vosselman,et al.  Single and two epoch analysis of ICESat full waveform data over forested areas , 2008 .

[12]  Michael A. Lefsky,et al.  Revised method for forest canopy height estimation from Geoscience Laser Altimeter System waveforms , 2007 .

[13]  W. Wagner,et al.  Accuracy of large-scale canopy heights derived from LiDAR data under operational constraints in a complex alpine environment , 2006 .

[14]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  Vegetation height estimates for a mixed temperate forest using satellite laser altimetry , 2008 .

[15]  A. Neuenschwander,et al.  Characterization of ICESat/GLAS waveforms over terrestrial ecosystems: Implications for vegetation mapping , 2008 .

[16]  Qi Chen.  Assessment of terrain elevation derived from satellite laser altimetry over mountainous forest areas using airborne lidar data , 2010 .

[17]  Junjie Zhang,et al.  An improved method for estimating forest canopy height using ICESat-GLAS full waveform data over sloping terrain: A case study in Changbai mountains, China , 2010, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[18]  H. Zwally,et al.  Overview of the ICESat Mission , 2005 .

[19]  Michael A. Lefsky,et al.  Biomass accumulation rates of Amazonian secondary forest and biomass of old-growth forests from Landsat time series and the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System , 2009 .

[20]  J. Abshire,et al.  Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) on the ICESat Mission: On‐orbit measurement performance , 2005 .

[21]  W. Cohen,et al.  Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat , 2005 .

[22]  Xiaoli Sun,et al.  The Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) for the ICESat mission , 2000, CLEO 2000.

[23]  D. Harding,et al.  ICESat waveform measurements of within‐footprint topographic relief and vegetation vertical structure , 2005 .

[24]  Qi Chen.  Retrieving vegetation height of forests and woodlands over mountainous areas in the Pacific Coast region using satellite laser altimetry , 2010 .

[25]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality , 2007 .

[26]  Christiane Schmullius,et al.  Influence of Surface Topography on ICESat/GLAS Forest Height Estimation and Waveform Shape , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[27]  H. Zwally.  ICESat's Laser Measurements of Polar Ice and Atmospheres , 2003 .