Diagnostic, Surgical, and Technical Considerations for Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Osteopenia and Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review

Objective: Osteoporosis is increasing in incidence as the ageing population continues to grow. Decreased bone mineral density poses a challenge for the spine surgeon. In patients requiring lumbar interbody fusion, differences in diagnostics and surgical approaches may be warranted. In this systematic review, the authors examine studies performing lumbar interbody fusion in patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis and suggest avenues for future study. Methods: A systematic literature review of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases was performed for studies published between 1986 and 2020. Studies evaluating diagnostics, surgical approaches, and other technical considerations were included. Results: A total of 13 articles were ultimately selected for qualitative analysis. This includes studies demonstrating the utility of Hounsfield units in diagnosis, a survey of surgical approaches, as well as exploring the use of vertebral augmentation and cortical bone screw trajectory. Conclusions: This systematic review provides a summary of preliminary findings with respect to the use of Hounsfield units as a diagnostic tool, the benefit or lack thereof with respect to minimally invasive approaches, and the question of whether or not cement augmentation or cortical bone trajectory confers benefit in osteoporotic patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion. While the findings of these studies are promising, the current state of the literature is limited in scope and, for this reason, definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from these data. The authors highlight gaps in the literature and the need for further exploration and study of lumbar interbody fusion in the osteoporotic spine.

[1]  Dong Chan Lee,et al.  Clinical and radiological comparison of 2 level anterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterolateral fusion and percutaneous pedicle screw in elderly patients with osteoporosis , 2020, Medicine.

[2]  Weishi Li,et al.  Computed tomography Hounsfield unit-based prediction of pedicle screw loosening after surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[3]  Yue Zhou,et al.  Comparison of the fenestrated pedicle screw and conventional pedicle screw in minimally percutaneous fixation for the treatment of spondylolisthesis with osteoporotic spine , 2019, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[4]  Zili Wang,et al.  Efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis combined with osteoporosis. , 2019, Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira.

[5]  Xiaotao Wu,et al.  Early Clinical Outcome of Lumbar Spinal Fixation With Cortical Bone Trajectory Pedicle Screws in Patients With Osteoporosis With Degenerative Disease. , 2019, Orthopedics.

[6]  S. Moon,et al.  Repeat decompression and fusions following posterolateral fusion versus posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylosis: a national database study , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Chun Jiang,et al.  Pedicle Screw with Cement Augmentation in Unilateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study. , 2018, World neurosurgery.

[8]  Warren D. Yu,et al.  Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Cement Augmentation Without Posterior Fixation to Treat Isthmic Spondylolisthesis in an Osteopenic Patient—A Surgical Technique , 2018, International Journal of Spine Surgery.

[9]  A. Cifu,et al.  Treatment of Osteoporosis. , 2018, JAMA.

[10]  Venkata Ramesh Chandra Vemula,et al.  Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using bone cement-augmented pedicle screws for lumbar spondylolisthesis in patients with osteoporosis. Case series and review of literature , 2018, Neurology India.

[11]  G. Schackert,et al.  First clinical results of minimally invasive vector lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-VLIF) in spondylodiscitis and concomitant osteoporosis: a technical note , 2017, European Spine Journal.

[12]  Jin-Sung Kim,et al.  Salvage Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Using Polymethyl Methacrylate in Patients with Failed Interbody Fusion. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[13]  M. Helgeson,et al.  Diagnosing the Undiagnosed: Osteoporosis in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion , 2016, Spine.

[14]  F. Girardi,et al.  An Association Can Be Found Between Hounsfield Units and Success of Lumbar Spine Fusion , 2014, HSS Journal ®.

[15]  J. Dufton,et al.  The Assessment of Anemia from Attenuation Values of Cranial Venous Drainage on Unenhanced Computed Tomography of the Head , 2013, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[16]  I. Ouzaid,et al.  A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non‐contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study , 2012, BJU international.

[17]  Dong Li,et al.  Computed tomography scans in the evaluation of fatty liver disease in a population based study: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. , 2012, Academic radiology.

[18]  A Jay Khanna,et al.  Instrumentation of the osteoporotic spine: biomechanical and clinical considerations. , 2011, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[19]  P. Heini The current treatment—a survey of osteoporotic fracture treatment. Osteoporotic spine fractures: the spine surgeon’s perspective , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[20]  Tadeusz J. Janik,et al.  Prediction of Osteoporotic Spinal Deformity , 2003, Spine.

[21]  J. L. Melton,et al.  Epidemiology of Spinal Osteoporosis , 1997, Spine.

[22]  C. Cooper,et al.  Epidemiology of osteoporosis. , 2002, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[23]  Y L Lee,et al.  The Osteoporotic Spine , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.