Electrosensory interference in naturally occurring aggregates of a species of weakly electric fish, Eigenmannia virescens

The detection and identification of behaviorally relevant signals in the presence of competing signals in the environment is a major challenge of animal sensory systems. In weakly electric fish such as Eigenmannia virescens, the interactions between the autogenous electric field and the electric fields of nearby conspecifics can have profound effects on the perception of other behaviorally relevant electrosensory information. To better understand the natural signals that the nervous system of Eigenmannia experiences during the processing of electrosensory information, we examined the electrosensory milieu of Eigenmannia in the wild and in the laboratory. Recordings of the electric fields of Eigenmannia were made in 'black' and 'white' waters near the Napo River in eastern Ecuador. Fourier analysis revealed that Eigenmannia typically experience the electric fields of three to five conspecifics during the day and night in each habitat. The median difference in electric organ discharge frequencies between nearby Eigenmannia during the day was 23 Hz in black water habitats, 41 Hz in white water, and 37 Hz at night in both habitats: these signals are known to activate tuberous electroreceptors and downstream CNS circuits. There was no correlation between the number of individual Eigenmannia detected at recording sites and electric organ discharge frequencies. Further, Eigenmannia apparently do not maximize the frequency differences between conspecifics. In laboratory studies fish were preferentially observed in aggregates of two fish or more. Aggregate sizes observed in the laboratory were similar to those in the wild.

[1]  Eric S. Fortune,et al.  Effects of global electrosensory signals on motion processing in the midbrain of Eigenmannia , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[2]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  The neural basis of a sensory filter in the Jamming Avoidance Response: No grandmother cells in sight , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[3]  H. Zakon,et al.  Electric organ discharge frequency and plasma sex steroid levels during gonadal recrudescence in a natural population of the weakly electric fish Sternopygus macrurus , 1991, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[4]  Kent D. Dunlap,et al.  Retreat site selection and social organization in captive electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[5]  E. Fortune,et al.  Short-term synaptic plasticity as a temporal filter , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  A. Feng,et al.  Neural basis of hearing in real-world situations. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  J. Atema Chemical signals in the marine environment: dispersal, detection, and temporal signal analysis. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Court and spark: electric signals in the courtship and mating of gymnotoid fish , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  D. Grünbaum Schooling as a strategy for taxis in a noisy environment , 1998, Evolutionary Ecology.

[10]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  The Jamming Avoidance Response inEigenmannia revisited: The structure of a neuronal democracy , 1978, Journal of comparative physiology.

[11]  J. Mappes,et al.  Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations , 2001, Nature.

[12]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[13]  The Long-Term Resetting of a Brainstem Pacemaker Nucleus by Synaptic Input: A Model for Sensorimotor Adaptation , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Julia K. Parrish,et al.  Animal Groups in Three Dimensions: Analysis , 1997 .

[15]  E. Fortune,et al.  Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity Contributes to the Temporal Filtering of Electrosensory Information , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  C. Pytte,et al.  Regulation of vocal amplitude by the blue-throated hummingbird, Lampornis clemenciae , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  J. Hutchinson Animal groups in three dimensions , 1999 .

[18]  Carl D. Hopkins,et al.  Electric Communication: Functions in the Social Behavior of Eigenmannia Virescens , 1974 .

[19]  Henning Scheich,et al.  The jamming avoidance response of high frequency electric fish , 1972, Journal of comparative physiology.

[20]  Björn Lardner,et al.  Animal communication: Tree-hole frogs exploit resonance effects , 2002, Nature.

[21]  G. Westby The ecology, discharge diversity and predatory behaviour of gymnotiforme electric fish in the coastal streams of French Guiana , 1988, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[22]  Harold H. Zakon,et al.  Species-specific differences in sensorimotor adaptation are correlated with differences in social structure , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[23]  C. Slobodchikoff,et al.  Habitat structure and alarm call dialects in Gunnison's prairie dog (Cynomys gunnisoni) , 2002 .

[24]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Non-classical receptive field mediates switch in a sensory neuron's frequency tuning , 2003, Nature.

[25]  Kenneth S. Norris,et al.  Cooperative societies in three- dimensional space: On the origins of aggregations, flocks, and schools, with special reference to dolphins and fish , 1988 .

[26]  Frances S. Chance,et al.  Synaptic Depression and the Temporal Response Characteristics of V1 Cells , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  B. S. Nelson Reliability of sound attenuation in Florida scrub habitat and behavioral implications. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Frank Kirschbaum,et al.  SPECIES SPECIFICITY OF ELECTRIC ORGAN DISCHARGES IN A SYMPATRIC GROUP OF GYMNOTOID FISH FROM MANAUS (AMAZONAS) , 1981 .

[29]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach , 1978 .

[30]  A. Watanabe,et al.  The Change of Discharge Frequency by A.C. Stimulus in a Weak Electric Fish , 1963 .

[31]  Henning Scheich,et al.  The Jamming Avoidance Response of High Frequency Electric Fish , 1972 .

[32]  Michel Treisman,et al.  Predation and the evolution of gregariousness. I. Models for concealment and evasion , 1975, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  G. Czéh,et al.  Sensory physiology of aquatic lower vertebrates , 1981 .

[34]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Oddity and the ‘confusion effect’ in predation , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  Walter Heiligenberg,et al.  Neural Nets in Electric Fish , 1991 .

[36]  S. Salzberg,et al.  Non-classical receptive field mediates switch in a sensory neuron ’ s frequency tuning , 2022 .

[37]  G. Turner,et al.  Attack Abatement: A Model for Group Protection by Combined Avoidance and Dilution , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[38]  Gary J. Rose,et al.  Frequency-Dependent PSP Depression Contributes to Low-Pass Temporal Filtering in Eigenmannia , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.