Beyond the 'Grid-Lock' in Electricity Interconnectors: The Case of Germany and Poland

The common European electricity market requires both market integration and transmission grid expansion, including trans-border interconnectors. Although the benefits of increased interconnectivity are widely acknowledged, expansion of interconnectors is often very slow. This paper gathers insights on the reasons behind this “grid-lock” drawing on the study of the German-Polish border. Although two interconnectors already exist, the trade is blocked by unplanned electricity loop flows. A third interconnector has been discussed for years, but saw little progress in spite of declarations of support on both sides. Drawing on the existing literature on the topic of grid expansion we identify four hypotheses for the grid-lock: inadequate financing; diverging interests; governance and administration problems; and different actors’ motivations, trust and security perceptions. We evaluate them using the empirical material gathered through document analysis and stakeholder interviews conducted in Germany and Poland. None of the hypotheses on its own can explain the “gridlock”. However, while financing has not been a major obstacle, divergent interests had an impact on the project delay, administrative and governance problems are a great hindrance on the technical level, while motivations influence interstate political relations and policy shaping. EU support and closer bilateral cooperation provide opportunities to address these challenges.

[1]  Christoph Weber,et al.  The future of the European electricity system and the impact of fluctuating renewable energy – A scenario analysis , 2014 .

[2]  Kacper Szulecki,et al.  German-Polish Cooperation in Renewables: Towards Policy Convergence? , 2014 .

[3]  Armin Steinbach,et al.  Barriers and solutions for expansion of electricity grids—the German experience , 2013 .

[4]  Arthur Henriot Financing investment in the European electricity transmission network: Consequences on long-term sustainability of the TSOs financial structure , 2013 .

[5]  A. Wagner,et al.  How much energy in energy policy? The media on energy problems in developing countries (with the example of Poland) , 2012 .

[6]  Antonella Battaglini,et al.  Perception of barriers for expansion of electricity grids in the European Union , 2012 .

[7]  A. Goldthau Introduction ‐ Policy Agendas for the Future of Global Energy , 2012 .

[8]  S. Koten Merchant interconnector projects by generators in the EU: Profitability and allocation of capacity , 2012 .

[9]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Congestion Management in European Power Networks: Criteria to Assess the Available Options , 2011 .

[10]  M. D. Nooij,et al.  Social cost-benefit analysis of electricity interconnector investment: A critical appraisal , 2011 .

[11]  Toshihiko Nakata,et al.  Analysis of the impact of electricity grid interconnection between Korea and Japan—Feasibility study for energy network in Northeast Asia , 2006 .

[12]  Kamila Pronińska Development of “Green Energy” in Coal-Based Energy Culture – Implications for Poland’s Energy Security , 2013 .

[13]  C. Kemfert,et al.  Energy Transition Calls for High Investment , 2013 .

[14]  H. Majchrzak Planowanie rozwoju polskiej sieci przesyłowej w perspektywie 2025 , 2012 .

[15]  T. Sikorski,et al.  Krajowy rynek energii elektrycznej jako element zintegrowanego rynku europejskiego od Lizbony po Helsinki , 2012 .