Global versus structured interpretation of motion: moving light displays

Moving light displays (MLDs) have been used extensively to study motion perception and perception of the human gait in particular. MLD perception is largely considered to be structural, i.e., perception depends on identification of human kinematic structure. However, work by Little and Boyd (1996) has shown that it is possible to recognize individual people, from their gaits, by non-structural means. They use global shape-of-motion features derived from optical flow in a sequence of gray-scale images. Our goal is to show that shape-of-motion features can be derived equally well from MLD images as from gray-scale images, and to compare the recent results obtained for shape-of-motion recognition with psychophysical observations about MLD perception. The implication is that non-structural shape-of-motion interpretation of gait can be applied to MLDs, allowing us to interpret significant MLD results in the context of a known algorithm. Our results shed light on the validity of shape-of-motion features from the psychophysical standpoint as well as suggest an alternative approach to understanding MLD perception. In particular we find that characterizing movement in a gait may be treated as the sum of a set of moving points (if this is true then MLD lights need not be placed right at joints). Changes to a subset of the points affect the sum and consequently affect the perception of the whole.

[1]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[2]  G. Johansson Visual motion perception. , 1975, Scientific American.

[3]  J. Cutting,et al.  Temporal and spatial factors in gait perception that influence gender recognition , 1978, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  S. Sumi Upside-down Presentation of the Johansson Moving Light-Spot Pattern , 1984, Perception.

[5]  T. Poggio,et al.  A parallel algorithm for real-time computation of optical flow , 1989, Nature.

[6]  Randal C. Nelson,et al.  Detecting activities , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  David C. Hogg,et al.  Learning Flexible Models from Image Sequences , 1994, ECCV.

[8]  Randal C. Nelson,et al.  Nonparametric Recognition of Nonrigid Motion , 1995 .

[9]  J. Little,et al.  Describing motion for recognition , 1995, Proceedings of International Symposium on Computer Vision - ISCV.

[10]  David C. Hogg,et al.  Learning Spatiotemporal Models From Training Examples , 1995 .

[11]  Mubarak Shah,et al.  Motion-based recognition a survey , 1995, Image Vis. Comput..

[12]  James W. Davis,et al.  An appearance-based representation of action , 1996, Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[13]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Cardboard people: a parameterized model of articulated image motion , 1996, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition.

[14]  James W. Davis,et al.  Real-time recognition of activity using temporal templates , 1996, Proceedings Third IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision. WACV'96.

[15]  J. Little,et al.  Recognizing People by Their Gait: The Shape of Motion , 1998 .