Comparison of well-mixed and multiple representative interactive flamelet approaches for diesel spray combustion modelling

The application of detailed chemistry to the computational fluid dynamics simulation of combustion process in diesel engines has many potentials, including the possibility to predict auto-ignition, diffusion flame structure, stabilisation and soot formation in a wide range of operating conditions, also taking into account the effects of different fuel types. Among the approaches that were proposed over the years, the ones that are mostly used in practical calculations can be divided into two main categories: the first assumes each cell to be a well-stirred reactor, while the second employs the flamelet assumption to describe both auto-ignition and turbulent diffusion flame propagation. Despite the fact that both types of model have been widely validated over the years, a detailed comparison between them appears to be very useful in order to understand better the relevant parameters governing auto-ignition, flame stabilisation and the formation of pollutant emissions. This work is focused on a comparison of two different combustion models that were recently implemented by the authors in an open-source code. The first assumes each cell to be a homogeneous reactor and neglects interaction between turbulence and chemistry, while in the second, multiple laminar flamelets are used to represent the structure of a turbulent diffusion flame. Suitable techniques for online reaction rate tabulation and chemical mechanism reduction are also incorporated, to make the use of bigger mechanisms possible (up to 150 species). The two models are compared and validated by simulating constant-volume diesel combustion in a wide range of operating conditions, including variations of ambient temperature and oxygen concentration. Comparison between the computed and experimental data on flame structure, auto-ignition and flame lift-off enables an understanding of the main relevant differences between the models in the way both auto-ignition and flame stabilisation processes are predicted.

[1]  X. Bai,et al.  Effects of EGR on the structure and emissions of diesel combustion , 2013 .

[2]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Effects of strain rate on high-pressure nonpremixed n-heptane autoignition in counterflow , 2004 .

[3]  Francesco Contino,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of nitric oxide effect on the ignition of iso-octane in a single cylinder HCCI engine , 2013 .

[4]  N. Peters.  Laminar flamelet concepts in turbulent combustion , 1988 .

[5]  Luc Vervisch,et al.  Spray vaporization in nonpremixed turbulent combustion modeling: a single droplet model , 2000 .

[6]  Daniel L. Flowers,et al.  Acceleration of Detailed Chemical Kinetics Using Multi-zone Modeling for CFD in Internal Combustion Engine Simulations , 2012 .

[7]  Caroline L. Genzale,et al.  Comparison of Diesel Spray Combustion in Different High-Temperature, High-Pressure Facilities , 2010 .

[8]  Sumathy Raman,et al.  The use of dynamic adaptive chemistry in combustion simulation of gasoline surrogate fuels , 2009 .

[9]  P. Dagaut,et al.  Experimental and Modeling Study of the Oxidation Kinetics of n-Undecane and n-Dodecane in a Jet-Stirred Reactor , 2012 .

[10]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Mixing and flame structures inferred from OH-PLIF for conventional and low-temperature diesel engine combustion , 2009 .

[11]  Mehdi Jangi,et al.  Multidimensional chemistry coordinate mapping approach for combustion modelling with finite-rate chemistry , 2012 .

[12]  Song-Charng Kong,et al.  Modeling Diesel Spray Flame Liftoff, Sooting Tendency, and NOx Emissions Using Detailed Chemistry With Phenomenological Soot Model , 2007 .

[13]  Xiaofeng Yang,et al.  Ignition and Combustion Simulations of Spray-Guided SIDI Engine using Arrhenius Combustion with Spark-Energy Deposition Model , 2012 .

[14]  N. Peters.  Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion , 1984 .

[15]  Harry Lehtiniemi,et al.  "Efficient 3-D CFD Combustion Modeling with Transient Flamelet Models" , 2008 .

[16]  Norbert Peters,et al.  Three-Dimensional Simulation of Pollutant Formation in a DI Diesel Engine Using Multiple Interactive Flamelets , 1998 .

[17]  Tommaso Lucchini,et al.  Numerical Investigation of Non-Reacting and Reacting Diesel Sprays in Constant-Volume Vessels , 2009 .

[18]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Soot in diesel fuel jets: effects of ambient temperature, ambient density, and injection pressure , 2004 .

[19]  Rolf D. Reitz,et al.  Acceleration of the chemistry solver for modeling DI engine combustion using dynamic adaptive chemistry (DAC) schemes , 2010 .

[20]  Francesco Contino,et al.  Simulations of Advanced Combustion Modes Using Detailed Chemistry Combined with Tabulation and Mechanism Reduction Techniques , 2012 .

[21]  Tommaso Lucchini,et al.  Numerical investigation of the spray–mesh–turbulence interactions for high-pressure, evaporating sprays at engine conditions , 2011 .

[22]  John Abraham,et al.  Evaluation of an Unsteady Flamelet Progress Variable Model for Autoignition and Flame Lift-Off in Diesel Jets , 2013 .

[23]  Shigeyuki Tanaka,et al.  A reduced chemical kinetic model for HCCI combustion of primary reference fuels in a rapid compression machine , 2003 .

[24]  Song-Charng Kong,et al.  Modeling diesel spray flame lift-off, sooting tendency and NOx emissions using detailed chemistry , 2005 .

[25]  C. Beatrice,et al.  Soot particle size modelling in 3D simulations of diesel engine combustion , 2011 .

[26]  C. Bae,et al.  Modeling of flame lift-off length in diesel low-temperature combustion with multi-dimensional CFD based on the flame surface density and extinction concept , 2010 .

[27]  C. Baumgarten.  Mixture formation in internal combustion engines , 2006 .

[28]  S. Som,et al.  Effects of primary breakup modeling on spray and combustion characteristics of compression ignition engines , 2010 .

[29]  C. Westbrook,et al.  A comprehensive detailed chemical kinetic reaction mechanism for combustion of n-alkane hydrocarbons from n-octane to n-hexadecane , 2009 .

[30]  Arnold Neumaier,et al.  Introduction to Numerical Analysis , 2001 .

[31]  Dennis L. Siebers,et al.  Flame Lift-Off on Direct-Injection Diesel Sprays Under Quiescent Conditions , 2001 .

[32]  N. Peters,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics modelling of non-premixed combustion in direct injection diesel engines , 2000 .

[33]  C Cemil Bekdemir,et al.  Modeling Diesel engine combustion using pressure dependent Flamelet Generated Manifolds , 2011 .

[34]  Yuanjiang Pei,et al.  Transported probability density function modelling of the vapour phase of an n-heptane jet at diesel engine conditions , 2013 .

[35]  Raul Payri,et al.  Engine combustion network (ECN): characterization and comparison of boundary conditions for different combustion vessels , 2012 .

[36]  Uwe Riedel,et al.  Turbulence-chemistry interactions in CFD modelling of diesel engines , 2008 .

[37]  Christian Hasse,et al.  A two-dimensional flamelet model for multiple injections in diesel engines , 2004 .

[38]  R. Reitz,et al.  Development and Validation of a Reduced Reaction Mechanism for HCCI Engine Simulations , 2004 .

[39]  Mehdi Jangi,et al.  A multi-zone chemistry mapping approach for direct numerical simulation of auto-ignition and flame propagation in a constant volume enclosure , 2012 .

[40]  T. Lucchini,et al.  Coupling of in situ adaptive tabulation and dynamic adaptive chemistry: An effective method for solving combustion in engine simulations , 2011 .

[41]  W. E. Ranz,et al.  Evaporation from drops , 1952 .

[42]  S. Pope,et al.  Exploiting ISAT to solve the reaction–diffusion equation , 2004 .

[43]  Sophie Papst,et al.  Computational Methods For Fluid Dynamics , 2016 .

[44]  P. Senecal,et al.  Multi-Dimensional Modeling of Direct-Injection Diesel Spray Liquid Length and Flame Lift-off Length using CFD and Parallel Detailed Chemistry , 2003 .

[45]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Three-Dimensional Modeling of NOx and Soot Formation in DI-Diesel Engines Using Detailed Chemistry Based on the Interactive Flamelet Approach , 1996 .

[46]  S M Aceves,et al.  A fully coupled computational fluid dynamics and multi-zone model with detailed chemical kinetics for the simulation of premixed charge compression ignition engines , 2005 .

[47]  R. Reitz.  Modeling atomization processes in high-pressure vaporizing sprays , 1987 .

[48]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  An extended multi-regime flamelet model for IC engines , 2012 .

[49]  Konstantinos Boulouchos,et al.  Simulations of spray autoignition and flame establishment with two-dimensional CMC , 2005 .