Chains of damages and failures in a metropolitan environment: some observations on the Kobe earthquake in 1995.

The interaction and the couple effects that may occur as induced and indirect consequences of any triggering hazard in metropolitan areas is one of the most important problems to be tackled during disasters, as the Kobe earthquake in 1995 showed very clearly. The analysis of direct, secondary and indirect effects of the Kobe earthquake suggests to substitute the concept of chain of losses and failures to the simple couple hazardous event-damages which is currently used. Not only parameters related to physical weakness or strength of the built environment should be considered by scientists, experts and decision-makers. Organisational, social, and systemic factors are equally crucial to understand the magnified dimension of disasters at increasing levels of exposed systems vulnerability. Linking failures due to different kinds of vulnerability one to the other permits to reconstruct complete event scenarios, where social and organisational elements are not simply added to the 'hard' components of cities, but contribute to explain why failures and losses occurred and why it took so long to repair them. Lifeline damage assessment provides a good example to show how physical, organisational and systemic vulnerabilities are intimately connected one to the other. The point of view from which governance problems related to prevention and emergency preparedness will be looked at is that of an urban and regional planner. When planners look for design solutions suitable for a specific town or region, they must constantly bridge between hard technical matters and social and economical concerns. Furthermore, they are forced to consider in their projects spatial and geographic dimensions. Those two typical features of planners' approach to problem solving can be interesting for scholars in the field of risk assessment and mitigation research.

[1]  建設省建築研究所 Proceedings of the IDNDR International Symposium on Earthquake Disaster Reduction Technology : in commemoration of the 30th anniversary of International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering : December 15-17, 1992, Tsukuba, Japan , 1992 .

[2]  Shiro Takada,et al.  QUICK REPORT OF MAIN DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE 1995 HYOGO-KEN NAMBU EARTHQUAKE , 1995 .

[3]  Enrico L Quarantelli,et al.  Disasters : theory and research , 1979 .

[4]  P. W. Beck,et al.  Corporate planning for an uncertain future , 1982 .

[5]  Saundra K. Schneider Flirting with Disaster: Public Management in Crisis Situations , 1995 .

[6]  Joyce Fortune,et al.  Understanding Systems Failures , 1988 .

[7]  京都大学防災研究所,et al.  An integrated framework on urban disaster countermeasures based on the Hyogoken-Nambu (Kobe) Japan Earthquake of January 17, 1995 : English edition of the final report , 1995 .

[8]  Joseph Scanlon Help from the deep: the potential of ocean‐based response to disaster , 1996 .

[9]  読売新聞大阪本社 Chronicle, the Great Hanshin Earthquake , 1996 .

[10]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[11]  A. J. Schiff The Whittier Narrows, California Earthquake of October 1, 1987—Response of Lifelines and Their Effect on Emergency Response , 1988 .

[12]  Kenneth Hewitt,et al.  Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters , 1997 .

[13]  J. Scanlon Emergent Groups in Established Frameworks: Ottawa Carleton's Response to the 1998 Ice Disaster , 1999 .

[14]  B. Lau,et al.  Water-Power Lifeline Interaction , 1995 .

[15]  Hitoshi Joh Disaster Stress of the 1995 Kobe Earthquake , 1997 .

[16]  T. Drabek Human System Responses to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings , 2011 .

[17]  Scott D. Sagan,et al.  The Limits of Safety , 2020, The Limits of Safety.

[18]  K. Dow,et al.  Exploring differences in our common future(s): the meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change , 1992 .

[19]  Joyce Fortune,et al.  Learning from Failure—The Systems Approach , 1995 .