Three-Dimensional Velocity Obstacle Method for UAV's Uncoordinated Avoidance Maneuver

This paper proposes a novel avoidance method called the Three-Dimensional Velocity Obstacle (3DVO) method. The method is designed for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) applications, in particular to autonomously handle uncoordinated encounters in an integrated airspace, by exploiting the limited space in a three-dimensional manner. The method is a three-dimensional extension of the Velocity Obstacle method that can reactively generate an avoidance maneuver by changing the vehicle velocity vector based on the encounter geometry. Adverse maneuvers of the obstacle are anticipated by introducing the concept of a buffer velocity set, which ensures that the ownship will diverge before the collision. A three-dimensional resolution is generated by choosing the right plane for avoidance, in which the UAV conducts a pure turning maneuver. Implementation of the 3DVO method is tested in several simulations that demonstrate its capability to resolve various three-dimensional conflicts. A validation using Monte Carlo simulations is also conducted in stressful ’super-conflict’ scenarios, which results in zero collisions for the entire set of samples.

[1]  V. Di Vito,et al.  A novel 3D analytical algorithm for autonomous collision avoidance considering cylindrical safety bubble , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[2]  Zhi-Hong Mao,et al.  Stability and performance of intersecting aircraft flows under decentralized conflict avoidance rules , 2001, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[3]  René van Paassen,et al.  Design of an airborne three-dimensional separation assistance display , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[4]  René van Paassen,et al.  Ecological Interface Design of a Tactical Airborne Separation Assistance Tool , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[5]  Debasish Ghose,et al.  Generalization of the collision cone approach for motion safety in 3-D environments , 2012, Auton. Robots.

[6]  E. van Kampen,et al.  Conflict detection and resolution system architecture for unmanned aerial vehicles in civil airspace , 2015 .

[7]  Paolo Fiorini,et al.  Motion Planning in Dynamic Environments Using Velocity Obstacles , 1998, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  The Hybrid Reciprocal Velocity Obstacle , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[9]  René van Paassen,et al.  Design of a Coplanar Airborne Separation Display , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[10]  Jacco M. Hoekstra,et al.  Designing for safety: the 'free flight' air traffic management concept , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  C. C. de Visser,et al.  Three-dimensional velocity obstacle method for UAV deconflicting maneuvers , 2015 .

[12]  M. M. van Paassen,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Vertical Separation Assistance Display , 2008 .

[13]  Debasish Ghose,et al.  Obstacle avoidance in a dynamic environment: a collision cone approach , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[14]  Joost Ellerbroek,et al.  Selective Velocity Obstacle Method for Deconflicting Maneuvers Applied to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2015 .

[15]  Dinesh Manocha,et al.  Reciprocal Velocity Obstacles for real-time multi-agent navigation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Erwin Prassler,et al.  Recursive Probabilistic Velocity Obstacles for Reflective Navigation , 2003, FSR.

[17]  Joost Ellerbroek,et al.  Evaluation of a Separation Assistance Display in a Multi-Actor Experiment , 2011 .

[18]  René van Paassen,et al.  Artificial Force Field for Haptic Feedback in UAV Teleoperation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.