Reducing contact forces in the arch and supra-aortic vessels using the Magellan robot.

[1]  Hedyeh Rafii-Tari,et al.  Towards automated surgical skill evaluation of endovascular catheterization tasks based on force and motion signatures , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[2]  F. Moll,et al.  Current state in tracking and robotic navigation systems for application in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. , 2015, Journal of vascular surgery.

[3]  N. Cheshire,et al.  Robot-assisted uterine artery embolization: a first-in-woman safety evaluation of the Magellan System. , 2014, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[4]  A. Sannino,et al.  Cerebral embolic lesions detected with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging following carotid artery stenting: a meta-analysis of 8 studies comparing filter cerebral protection and proximal balloon occlusion. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  Douglas L. Packer,et al.  Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  Petr Stadler,et al.  Robotic technology in cardiovascular medicine , 2014, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[7]  Mohamad Hamady,et al.  The use of robotic endovascular catheters in the facilitation of transcatheter aortic valve implantation. , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[8]  J. Bismuth,et al.  A randomized, controlled animal trial demonstrating the feasibility and safety of the Magellan™ endovascular robotic system. , 2014, Annals of vascular surgery.

[9]  Hedyeh Rafii-Tari,et al.  Current and Emerging Robot-Assisted Endovascular Catheterization Technologies: A Review , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  J. Schofer,et al.  Risk Factors for Cerebral Embolization After Carotid Artery Stenting With Embolic Protection: A Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study in 837 Consecutive Patients , 2013, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[11]  D. Stoyanov,et al.  A pilot study of video-motion analysis in endovascular surgery: development of real-time discriminatory skill metrics. , 2013, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[12]  Jan Petru,et al.  Electrical Reconnection After Pulmonary Vein Isolation Is Contingent on Contact Force During Initial Treatment: Results From the EFFICAS I Study , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[13]  Borut Gersak,et al.  A first-in-man study of the role of flexible robotics in overcoming navigation challenges in the iliofemoral arteries. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.

[14]  N. Cheshire,et al.  Robot-assisted fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) using the Magellan system. , 2013, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[15]  P. Nederkoorn,et al.  Characteristics of Ischemic Brain Lesions After Stenting or Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: Results From the International Carotid Stenting Study–Magnetic Resonance Imaging Substudy , 2013, Stroke.

[16]  Hedyeh Rafii-Tari,et al.  A force feedback system for endovascular catheterisation , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[17]  J. Peinado,et al.  A diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging-based study of transcervical carotid stenting with flow reversal versus transfemoral filter protection. , 2012, Journal of vascular surgery.

[18]  N. Cheshire,et al.  Advantages and limitations of robotic endovacular catheters for carotid artery stenting. , 2012, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  Nadir Saoudi,et al.  The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[20]  Hedyeh Rafii-Tari,et al.  Assessment of Navigation Cues with Proximal Force Sensing during Endovascular Catheterization , 2012, MICCAI.

[21]  E D Avgerinos,et al.  The European Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for carotid intervention: an updated independent assessment and literature review. , 2012, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[22]  W. Saliba,et al.  Worldwide Experience with the Robotic Navigation System in Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Methodology, Efficacy and Safety , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[23]  J. Schofer,et al.  The PROFI study (Prevention of Cerebral Embolization by Proximal Balloon Occlusion Compared to Filter Protection During Carotid Artery Stenting): a prospective randomized trial. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  K. Søreide.  Strengthening the trauma chain of survival , 2012, The British journal of surgery.

[25]  Danail Stoyanov,et al.  Video motion analysis for objective assessment in catheter-based endovascular intervention , 2012 .

[26]  Jenny Dankelman,et al.  Force Parameters for Skills Assessment in Laparoscopy , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[27]  B. Lane,et al.  Safety and feasibility of a novel transcervical access neuroprotection system for carotid artery stenting in the PROOF Study. , 2011, Journal of vascular surgery.

[28]  D. Andreini,et al.  Microembolization during carotid artery stenting in patients with high-risk, lipid-rich plaque. A randomized trial of proximal versus distal cerebral protection. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  C V Riga,et al.  Advanced catheter technology: is this the answer to overcoming the long learning curve in complex endovascular procedures. , 2011, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[30]  N. Cheshire,et al.  Evaluation of robotic endovascular catheters for arch vessel cannulation. , 2011, Journal of vascular surgery.

[31]  J. Bismuth,et al.  Transcranial Doppler findings during thoracic endovascular aortic repair. , 2011, Journal of vascular surgery.

[32]  Stuart J Pocock,et al.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  J. Bismuth,et al.  Feasibility and Safety of Remote Endovascular Catheter Navigation in a Porcine Model , 2011, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[34]  Nigel W. John,et al.  The Role of Haptics in Medical Training Simulators: A Survey of the State of the Art , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[35]  H. Lee,et al.  The Influence of Carotid Artery Catheterization Technique on the Incidence of Thromboembolism during Carotid Artery Stenting , 2010, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[36]  M. Ezekowitz,et al.  The evolving field of stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 2010, Stroke.

[37]  H. Jäger,et al.  New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) , 2010, Lancet Neurology.

[38]  M. Forsting,et al.  Silent and Apparent Cerebral Ischemia After Percutaneous Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation: A Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2010, Circulation.

[39]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[40]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2010, Circulation.

[41]  R. Featherstone,et al.  Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Endarterectomy and Endovascular Treatment for Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Cochrane Systematic Review , 2009, Stroke.

[42]  H. Lambert,et al.  Novel Contact Force Sensor Incorporated in Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter Predicts Lesion Size and Incidence of Steam Pop and Thrombus , 2008, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[43]  Y. Okumura,et al.  A Systematical Analysis of In Vivo Contact Forces on Virtual Catheter Tip/Tissue Surface Contact during Cardiac Mapping and Intervention , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[44]  Thomas M Krummel,et al.  Simulation-based endovascular skills assessment: the future of credentialing? , 2008, Journal of vascular surgery.

[45]  D. Yuh,et al.  Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[46]  A. Darzi,et al.  Endovascular skills training and assessment. , 2007, Journal of vascular surgery.

[47]  F. Verzini,et al.  Appropriateness of learning curve for carotid artery stenting: an analysis of periprocedural complications. , 2006, Journal of vascular surgery.

[48]  A. Lumsden,et al.  Carotid artery stenting with neuroprotection: assessing the learning curve and treatment outcome. , 2005, American journal of surgery.

[49]  R. Limet.  Cerebral microembolization after protected carotid artery stenting in surgical high-risk patients: results of a 2-year prospective study. , 2005 .

[50]  R. Ackerstaff.  Transcranial Doppler Monitoring in Angioplasty and Stenting of the Carotid Bifurcation , 2003, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[51]  Rolf Fimmers,et al.  Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study , 2003, The Lancet.