Blood metal ion testing is an effective screening tool to identify poorly performing metal-on-metal bearing surfaces

Objectives The aims of this piece of work were to: 1) record the background concentrations of blood chromium (Cr) and cobalt (Co) concentrations in a large group of subjects; 2) to compare blood/serum Cr and Co concentrations with retrieved metal-on-metal (MoM) hip resurfacings; 3) to examine the distribution of Co and Cr in the serum and whole blood of patients with MoM hip arthroplasties; and 4) to further understand the partitioning of metal ions between the serum and whole blood fractions. Methods A total of 3042 blood samples donated to the local transfusion centre were analysed to record Co and Cr concentrations. Also, 91 hip resurfacing devices from patients who had given pre-revision blood/serum samples for metal ion analysis underwent volumetric wear assessment using a coordinate measuring machine. Linear regression analysis was carried out and receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to assess the reliability of metal ions to identify abnormally wearing implants. The relationship between serum and whole blood concentrations of Cr and Co in 1048 patients was analysed using Bland-Altman charts. This relationship was further investigated in an in vitro study during which human blood was spiked with trivalent and hexavalent Cr, the serum then separated and the fractions analysed. Results Only one patient in the transfusion group was found to have a blood Co > 2 µg/l. Blood/Serum Cr and Co concentrations were reliable indicators of abnormal wear. Blood Co appeared to be the most useful clinical test, with a concentration of 4.5 µg/l showing sensitivity and specificity for the detection of abnormal wear of 94% and 95%, respectively. Generated metal ions tended to fill the serum compartment preferentially in vivo and this was replicated in the in vitro study when blood was spiked with trivalent Cr and bivalent Co. Conclusions Blood/serum metal ion concentrations are reliable indicators of abnormal wear processes. Important differences exist however between elements and the blood fraction under study. Future guidelines must take these differences into account.

[1]  T. Schmalzried,et al.  Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  P. Campbell,et al.  Metal ion levels in a triathlete with a metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[3]  P. Tarassoli,et al.  Sensitivity and specificity of blood cobalt and chromium metal ions for predicting failure of metal-on-metal hip replacement. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  H. Gill,et al.  The 2012 Otto Aufranc Award: The Interpretation of Metal Ion Levels in Unilateral and Bilateral Hip Resurfacing , 2013, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  G. Rivière,et al.  Dietary exposure to trace elements and health risk assessment in the 2nd French Total Diet Study. , 2012, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[6]  A. Zuckerman,et al.  IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans , 1995, IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans.

[7]  T P Schmalzried,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Walking Activity after Total Hip or Knee Replacement* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  T. Joyce,et al.  Blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a comparative study of articular surface replacement and Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasties. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  T. Joyce,et al.  Quantification of self-polishing in vivo from explanted metal-on-metal total replacements , 2011 .

[10]  P. Campbell,et al.  Metal ion measurement as a diagnostic tool to identify problems with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  J. Holland,et al.  Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: from a single, non-designer surgeon. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  T. Joyce,et al.  Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[13]  S. Brown,et al.  Release of hexavalent chromium from corrosion of stainless steel and cobalt-chromium alloys. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  J. Kuiper,et al.  The exercise-related rise in plasma cobalt levels after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[15]  P. Pynsent,et al.  Blood and urine metal ion levels in young and active patients after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: four-year results of a prospective longitudinal study. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  A. Toms,et al.  Silent soft tissue pathology is common with a modern metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty , 2011, Acta orthopaedica.

[18]  T. Joyce,et al.  Reducing metal ion release following hip resurfacing arthroplasty. , 2011, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[19]  P. Pynsent,et al.  The validity of serum levels as a surrogate measure of systemic exposure to metal ions in hip replacement. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  D W Murray,et al.  Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[21]  C. Van Der Straeten,et al.  Metal Ion Interpretation in Resurfacing versus Conventional Hip Arthroplasty and in Whole Blood versus Serum. How should we Interpret Metal Ion Data? , 2011, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.

[22]  H. Gill,et al.  Analysis of wear of retrieved metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants revised due to pseudotumours. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[23]  T J Joyce,et al.  Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: A consequence of excess wear. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[24]  A. Sanz-Medel,et al.  Metal release in patients with total hip arthroplasty by DF-ICP-MS and their association to serum proteins , 2009 .

[25]  C. Heisel,et al.  Characterization of the running-in period in total hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an in vivo and in vitro metal ion analysis. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  C. Rieker,et al.  Analysis of 118 second-generation metal-on-metal retrieved hip implants. , 1999, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[27]  Joshua J Jacobs,et al.  Accumulation in liver and spleen of metal particles generated at nonbearing surfaces in hip arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[28]  P. Beaulé A survey on the prevalence of pseudotumors with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in Canadian academic centers. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  C. Watson,et al.  Establishment of toxic metal reference range in tobacco from US cigarettes. , 2013, Journal of analytical toxicology.

[30]  L. Walter,et al.  Distribution of chromium and cobalt ions in various blood fractions after resurfacing hip arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[31]  T. Joyce,et al.  Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[32]  M. Wimmer,et al.  Consensus Statement “Current Evidence on the Management of Metal-on-Metal Bearings”: April 16, 2012 , 2013, Hip international : the journal of clinical and experimental research on hip pathology and therapy.