P300: The Similarities and Differences in the Scalp Distribution of Visual and Auditory Modality

To examine the topographic relationship of P3(00) between the visual and auditory modalities, especially to examine whether there are any modality-specific hemispheric differences of P3 in normal adults. Methods: The P3s were recorded from the same 41 normal right-handed males between the ages of 20 and 33 in both a typical auditory oddball task and a visual oddball paradigm with novel stimuli, with an extensive set of 61 scalp electrodes. In addition to the visual comparison and quantitative assessment of current source density (CSD) maps between the two modalities, canonical correlation analyses on the P3 raw amplitudes and examination of interaction effects of modality × location on both raw and normalized P3 data were performed. Results: The canonical correlation between modalities was generally high, especially at the left parietal brain region. There were no significant hemispheric effects in anterior brain but significant left-greater- than-right hemispheric effects in posterior brain regions in both modalities; modality-specific hemispheric effect was observed only at the parietal region. Strong surface current density activities were observed in the midline parietal-occipital area, and left and right boundary areas of temporal and inferior frontal region. Conclusions: The topographic similarities between P3s recorded in the visual and auditory modality outnumber the differences. Combining data from CSD assessments and profile analysis of P3 topography support the hypothesis of multiple generators of P3 that are differentially active in processing stimuli from different sensory modalities and are not symmetrically distributed between the two hemispheres.

[1]  R. Knight,et al.  P300 generation by novel somatosensory stimuli. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  E. Donchin,et al.  Detecting early communication: Using measures of movement-related potentials to illuminate human information processing , 1988, Biological Psychology.

[3]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 topography and modality effects from a single-stimulus paradigm. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[4]  Carla M. Bosco,et al.  Event-related brain potentials as indices of information extraction and response priming. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  D. Tucker Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  A. Lash,et al.  The P300 event-related potential. The effects of sleep deprivation. , 1992, Journal of occupational medicine. : official publication of the Industrial Medical Association.

[7]  J. Attias,et al.  Impaired Brain Processing in Noise‐Induced Tinnitus Patients as Measured by Auditory and Visual Event‐Related Potentials , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[8]  D. Friedman,et al.  A longitudinal study relating P3 amplitude to schizophrenia spectrum disorders and to global personality functioning , 1993, Biological Psychiatry.

[9]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Similarities and differences among the P3 waves to detected signals in three modalities. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[10]  V. Kostic,et al.  Utility of auditory P300 in detection of presenile dementia , 1995, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[11]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  J. Polich,et al.  P300 from one-, two-, and three-stimulus auditory paradigms. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[13]  M. W. Molen,et al.  Discovery of the P300: A tribute , 1991, Biological Psychology.

[14]  G Fein,et al.  P300 latency variability in normal elderly: effects of paradigm and measurement technique. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  H. Begleiter,et al.  A simple auditory oddball task in young adult males at high risk for alcoholism. , 1996, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[16]  H Begleiter,et al.  P300 hemispheric amplitude asymmetries from a visual oddball task. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[17]  Sara N. Davis Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1992 .

[18]  R. McCarley,et al.  Topographic abnormalities of P3 in schizotypal personality disorder , 1996, Biological Psychiatry.

[19]  J. Desmedt,et al.  New method for titrating differences in scalp topographic patterns in brain evoked potential mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[20]  H. Begleiter,et al.  Surface energy, its density and distance: New measures with application to human cerebral potentials , 2005, Brain Topography.

[21]  H. Shibasaki,et al.  Human auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: effects of response condition and age. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  T W Picton,et al.  The P300 Wave of the Human Event‐Related Potential , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[23]  D. Halpern Sex Differences in Cognitive Abilities , 1986 .

[24]  J. Polich,et al.  P300, probability, and the three-tone paradigm. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[25]  R. Srebro,et al.  A bootstrap method to compare the shapes of two scalp fields. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[26]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[27]  D Platt,et al.  The event-related P300 potential analysis of cognitive human brain aging: a review. , 1993, Gerontology.

[28]  J. Ford,et al.  ERPs in schizophrenia: Effects of antipsychotic medication , 1994, Biological Psychiatry.

[29]  H Begleiter,et al.  Hemispheric differences for P300 amplitude from an auditory oddball task. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[30]  R. Johnson,et al.  On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[31]  M. Westerfield,et al.  Monkey P3 in an “oddball” paradigm: Pharmacological support for multiple neural sources , 1993, Brain Research Bulletin.

[32]  H. Begleiter,et al.  Event-related potentials during digit recognition tasks. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[33]  R. Johnson,et al.  Auditory and visual P300s in temporal lobectomy patients: evidence for modality-dependent generators. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[34]  A R Haig,et al.  To scale or not to scale: McCarthy and Wood revisited. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[35]  E. Halgren,et al.  Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. III. Frontal cortex. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[36]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[37]  W. Ritter,et al.  The scalp topography of potentials in auditory and visual discrimination tasks. , 1977, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[39]  J. Polich,et al.  Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review , 1995, Biological Psychology.

[40]  W. Plihal,et al.  The scalp topography of P300 in the visual and auditory modalities: a comparison of three normalization methods and the control of statistical type II error. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[41]  P L Nunez,et al.  The Spline‐Laplacian in Clinical Neurophysiology: A Method to Improve EEG Spatial Resolution , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[42]  R. Bart Sangal,et al.  Topography of Auditory and Visual P300 in Normal Adults , 1996, Clinical EEG.

[43]  L. Schneider,et al.  P300 topography in Alzheimer's disease. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[44]  R. Johnson,et al.  Developmental evidence for modality-dependent P300 generators: a normative study. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[45]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  The effect of stimulus deviation on P3 waves to easily recognized stimuli , 1978, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  E. Donchin,et al.  On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. , 1984, Psychophysiology.