Pupil size tracks perceptual content and surprise

Changes in pupil size at constant light levels reflect the activity of neuromodulatory brainstem centers that control global brain state. These endogenously driven pupil dynamics can be synchronized with cognitive acts. For example, the pupil dilates during the spontaneous switches of perception of a constant sensory input in bistable perceptual illusions. It is unknown whether this pupil dilation only indicates the occurrence of perceptual switches, or also their content. Here, we measured pupil diameter in human subjects reporting the subjective disappearance and re‐appearance of a physically constant visual target surrounded by a moving pattern (‘motion‐induced blindness’ illusion). We show that the pupil dilates during the perceptual switches in the illusion and a stimulus‐evoked ‘replay’ of that illusion. Critically, the switch‐related pupil dilation encodes perceptual content, with larger amplitude for disappearance than re‐appearance. This difference in pupil response amplitude enables prediction of the type of report (disappearance vs. re‐appearance) on individual switches (receiver‐operating characteristic: 61%). The amplitude difference is independent of the relative durations of target‐visible and target‐invisible intervals and subjects' overt behavioral report of the perceptual switches. Further, we show that pupil dilation during the replay also scales with the level of surprise about the timing of switches, but there is no evidence for an interaction between the effects of surprise and perceptual content on the pupil response. Taken together, our results suggest that pupil‐linked brain systems track both the content of, and surprise about, perceptual events.

[1]  Martin Sarter,et al.  Phasic acetylcholine release and the volume transmission hypothesis: time to move on , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  Tomas Knapen,et al.  GABA Shapes the Dynamics of Bistable Perception , 2013, Current Biology.

[3]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving , 1964, Science.

[4]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Retinotopic Patterns of Correlated Fluctuations in Visual Cortex Reflect the Dynamics of Spontaneous Perceptual Suppression , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Christof Koch,et al.  Fully Formatted Pdf and Full Text (html) Versions Will Be Made Available Soon. Pupil Dilation Betrays the Timing of Decisions , 2022 .

[6]  Diego E. Shalom,et al.  Choosing in Freedom or Forced to Choose? Introspective Blindness to Psychological Forcing in Stage-Magic , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  W. Einhäuser,et al.  Binocular Rivalry: Frontal Activity Relates to Introspection and Action But Not to Perception , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Michael J. Goard,et al.  Fast Modulation of Visual Perception by Basal Forebrain Cholinergic Neurons , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Dov Sagi,et al.  Opposite Neural Signatures of Motion-Induced Blindness in Human Dorsal and Ventral Visual Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Wolfgang Einhäuser,et al.  Perceptual Rivalry: Reflexes Reveal the Gradual Nature of Visual Awareness , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  Ueli Rutishauser,et al.  Pupil size signals novelty and predicts later retrieval success for declarative memories of natural scenes. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[12]  George H. Denfield,et al.  Pupil Fluctuations Track Fast Switching of Cortical States during Quiet Wakefulness , 2014, Neuron.

[13]  R. O’Connell,et al.  Pupillometry and P3 index the locus coeruleus-noradrenergic arousal function in humans. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[14]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[15]  D. Heeger,et al.  Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  Ariel Zylberberg,et al.  Pupil Dilation: A Fingerprint of Temporal Selection During the “Attentional Blink” , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[17]  B. Laeng,et al.  Bright illusions reduce the eye's pupil , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Karl J. Friston The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  Y. Dan,et al.  Neuromodulation of Brain States , 2012, Neuron.

[20]  Stefan M. Wierda,et al.  Pupil dilation deconvolution reveals the dynamics of attention at high temporal resolution , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  W. Levelt,et al.  Pupillary dilation as a measure of attention: a quantitative system analysis , 1993 .

[22]  Yoram Bonneh,et al.  Motion induced blindness , 2011, Scholarpedia.

[23]  M. Fahle,et al.  How Much of the “Unconscious” is Just Pre – Threshold? , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The effects of neural gain on attention and learning , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[26]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[27]  R. O’Connell,et al.  Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[28]  Brian J. White,et al.  Microstimulation of the Monkey Superior Colliculus Induces Pupil Dilation Without Evoking Saccades , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  E. Bárány,et al.  Phasic inhibition of the light reflex of the pupil during retinal rivalry. , 1948, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  I. E. Loewenfeld,et al.  The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology, and Clinical Applications , 1999 .

[31]  M. Sarter,et al.  Article Prefrontal Acetylcholine Release Controls Cue Detection on Multiple Timescales , 2022 .

[32]  J. Grainger,et al.  The Pupillary Light Response Reveals the Focus of Covert Visual Attention , 2013, PloS one.

[33]  David J. Heeger,et al.  Motion-Induced Blindness and Troxler Fading: Common and Different Mechanisms , 2014, PloS one.

[34]  T. Knapen,et al.  Decision-related pupil dilation reflects upcoming choice and individual bias , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Andreas Glöckner,et al.  The Dynamics of Decision Making in Risky Choice: An Eye-Tracking Analysis , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[36]  K. N. Ogle,et al.  Dynamics of the pupil during binocular rivalry. , 1966, A M A Archives of Ophthalmology.

[37]  Niels A. Kloosterman,et al.  Top-down modulation in human visual cortex predicts the stability of a perceptual illusion. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  J. Hell,et al.  Motion-induced blindness in normal observers , 2022 .

[39]  Jean Lorenceau,et al.  Pupil dynamics during bistable motion perception. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[40]  C. Koch,et al.  Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  D. Munoz,et al.  Modulation of stimulus contrast on the human pupil orienting response , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.

[42]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Bistable Gestalts reduce activity in the whole of V1, not just the retinotopically predicted parts. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[43]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[44]  Mark S. Gilzenrat,et al.  Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[45]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[46]  W. Einhäuser,et al.  Pupil Dilation Signals Surprise: Evidence for Noradrenaline’s Role in Decision Making , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[47]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[48]  B. Laeng,et al.  The Eye Pupil Adjusts to Imaginary Light , 2014, Psychological science.

[49]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[50]  Angela J. Yu Change is in the eye of the beholder , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap CHAPMAN & HALL/CRC , 1993 .

[52]  Robert C. Wilson,et al.  Rational regulation of learning dynamics by pupil–linked arousal systems , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.