Improving Perception Accuracy in Bar Charts with Internal Contrast and Framing Enhancements

Bar charts are among the most commonly used visualization graphs. Their main goal is to communicate quantities that can be visually compared. Since they are easy to produce and interpret, they are found in any situation where quantitative data needs to be conveyed (websites, newspapers, etc.). However, depending on the layout, the perceived values can vary substantially. For instance, previous research has shown that the positioning of bars (e.g. stacked vs separate) may influence the accuracy in bar ratio length estimation. Other works have studied the effects of embellishments on the perception of encoded quantities. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the effect of perceptual elements used to reinforce the quantity depicted within the bars, such as contrast and inner lines, has not been studied in depth. In this research we present a study that analyzes the effect of several internal contrast and framing enhancements with respect to the use of basic solid bars. Our results show that the addition of minimal visual elements that are easy to implement with current technology can help users to better recognize the amounts depicted by the bar charts.

[1]  B. Marx.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1985 .

[2]  Oded Nov,et al.  How Deceptive are Deceptive Visualizations?: An Empirical Analysis of Common Distortion Techniques , 2015, CHI.

[3]  Nancy Green,et al.  A Model of Perceptual Task Effort for Bar Charts and its Role in Recognizing Intention , 2006, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[4]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Crowdsourcing graphical perception: using mechanical turk to assess visualization design , 2010, CHI.

[5]  Lane Harrison,et al.  An Evaluation of the Impact of Visual Embellishments in Bar Charts , 2015, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[6]  Niklas Elmqvist,et al.  Raising the Bars: Evaluating Treemaps vs. Wrapped Bars for Dense Visualization of Sorted Numeric Data , 2017, Graphics Interface.

[7]  Christian Wallraven,et al.  Experimental Design: From User Studies to Psychophysics , 2011 .

[8]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods , 1984 .

[9]  Eugene Wu,et al.  Graphical Perception in Animated Bar Charts , 2016, ArXiv.

[10]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  The Effect of Visual Appearance on the Performance of Continuous Sliders and Visual Analogue Scales , 2016, CHI.

[11]  Vidya Setlur,et al.  Four Experiments on the Perception of Bar Charts , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[12]  Robert McGill,et al.  An Experiment in Graphical Perception , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[13]  S. Lewandowsky,et al.  Displaying proportions and percentages , 1991 .

[14]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Black Hat Visualization , 2017 .

[15]  Hanspeter Pfister,et al.  Beyond Memorability: Visualization Recognition and Recall , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[16]  Petra Isenberg,et al.  Evaluation of alternative glyph designs for time series data in a small multiple setting , 2013, CHI.

[17]  Tran Quoc Khanh,et al.  Illumination, Color and Imaging: Evaluation and Optimization of Visual Displays , 2012 .

[18]  Anastasia Bezerianos,et al.  A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies on Data Glyphs , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[19]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .

[20]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Reading bar graphs: Effects of extraneous depth cues and graphical context. , 1998 .

[21]  David K. Simkin,et al.  An Information-Processing Analysis of Graph Perception , 1987 .