Cultural Selection for Learnability: Three hypotheses underlying the view that language adapts to be learnable.

Here is a far-reaching and vitally important question for those seeking to understand the evolution of language: Given a thorough understanding of whatever cognitive processes are relevant to learning, understanding, and producing language, would such an understanding enable us to predict the universal features of language? This question is important because, if met with an affirmative answer, then an explanation for why language evolved to exhibit certain forms and not others must be understood in terms of the biological evolution of the cognitive basis for language. After all, such an account pivots on the assumption that properties of the cognitive mechanisms supporting language map directly onto the universal features of language we observe. We argue against this position, and note that the relation between language universals and any cognitive basis for language is opaque. Certain hallmarks of language are adaptive in the

[1]  P. Matthews.  The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics , 1998 .

[2]  J. Batali.  Linguistic Evolution Through Language Acquisition: The negotiation and acquisition of recursive grammars as a result of competition among exemplars , 2002 .

[3]  J. Elman,et al.  Learning and morphological change , 1995, Cognition.

[4]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[5]  D. Marr,et al.  Artificial Intelligence - A Personal View , 1976, Artif. Intell..

[6]  R. Martin,et al.  The Cambridge encyclopedia of human evolution , 1994 .

[7]  Seth Bullock,et al.  Made to Measure: Ecological Rationality in Structured Environments , 1999, Minds and Machines.

[8]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Function, Selection, and Innateness: The Emergence of Language Universals , 1999 .

[9]  Barbara C. Scholz,et al.  Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments , 2002 .

[10]  J. Elman,et al.  Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development , 1996 .

[11]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition , 1986 .

[12]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Understanding intelligence , 2020, Inequality by Design.

[13]  M. Nowak,et al.  Towards an evolutionary theory of language , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Iterated Learning: A Framework for the Emergence of Language , 2003, Artificial Life.

[15]  S. Pinker,et al.  Natural language and natural selection , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[16]  Philip Lieberman,et al.  The Biology and Evolution of Language , 1984 .

[17]  Partha Niyogi,et al.  Evolutionary Consequences of Language Learning , 1997 .

[18]  S. Pinker.  The Language Instinct , 1994 .

[19]  James R. Hurford,et al.  Biological evolution of the Saussurean sign as a component of the language acquisition device , 1989 .

[20]  Wendy K. Wilkins,et al.  Brains evolution and neurolinguistic preconditions , 1995 .

[21]  John McCarthy,et al.  What Computers Still Can't Do , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[22]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .

[23]  Luc Stells,et al.  Constructing and Sharing Perceptual Distiinctions , 1997, ECML.

[24]  Ted Briscoe.  Grammatical acquisition: Inductive bias and coevolution of language and the language acquisition device , 2000 .