Doing what works: A grounded theory case study of technology use by teachers of English at a Korean university

Despite considerable effort and expenditure by the Korean government and universities to promote technology use in tertiary education, few teachers of English in Korea regularly and consistently employ technology in their teaching. Moreover, research into the hindrances and enablers of technology use in English education in Korea has been limited for primary and secondary schools and conspicuously absent on the tertiary level. This case study examines what teachers in a general English department at a private university in Seoul undergo as they consider the use of technology both in and out of classrooms. It attempts to provide a holistic look into teacher decision-making in this context. It employs a grounded theory of investigation underpinned by a close reading of the diffusion of innovations theory by Rogers (2003). Data for the study involves three main techniques: semi-structured interviews, a survey questionnaire, and classroom observations. Analysis follows an iterative, grounded method and includes use of both qualitative and quantitative software programs (Atlas.ti 5.0 and SPSS 16.0 respectively). Results from the study form a substantive theory entitled "what works" which helps explain the myriad of decisions that teachers make while trying to manage personal (internal) and administrative (external) goals and aims. Further, all decisions within this system are underpinned by "what works" for teachers in any situation both in terms of reliability and consistency. Implications suggest that the use of technology in the classroom exacerbates preexisting pedagogical and infrastructure issues, leading to inconsistencies in representation and application, as well as an overall limitation of potential use by teachers. Grounded theory approach to Rogers (2003) diffusion of innovations theory for technology use in Korean university English classes.Results from the study form a substantive theory entitled "what works".Teachers try to find a balance between their personal (internal) and administrative (external) goals and aims.The theory was able to explain/predict teacher perspective/potential for technology use in subsequent tests.Rogers (2003) theory expansion ideas suggested for tertiary settings.

[1]  Sarah Prestridge,et al.  The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[2]  Chava Nachmias,et al.  Research Methods in the Social Sciences , 1976 .

[3]  David Paterson.  Teachers' In-Flight Thinking in Inclusive Classrooms , 2007, Journal of learning disabilities.

[4]  H. Becker.  Findings from the Teaching, Learning, and Computing Survey: Is Larry Cuban Right? , 2000 .

[5]  Larry Cuban.  High-Tech Schools and Low-Tech Teaching , 1998, Journal of Computing in Teacher Education.

[6]  Geert Kelchtermans.  Teacher Vulnerability: understanding its moral and political roots , 1996 .

[7]  M. Fishbein.  The role of theory in HIV prevention , 2000, AIDS care.

[8]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[9]  B. Mullock.  THE PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE BASE OF FOUR TESOL TEACHERS , 2006 .

[10]  Andrew T. Lumpe,et al.  Assessing Teachers’ Context Beliefs about Technology Use , 2001 .

[11]  Howard Budin,et al.  The Computer Enters the Classroom , 1999, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[12]  Richard L. Venezky,et al.  Technology in the classroom: steps toward a new vision , 2004 .

[13]  Cheryl A. Franklin.  Factors That Influence Elementary Teachers Use of Computers , 2005 .

[14]  Robert Sommer,et al.  Experience and Education. , 1974 .

[15]  Nasser Saleh Al-Mansour,et al.  The effect of computer-assisted instruction on Saudi University students’ learning of English , 2012 .

[16]  R. V. D. Berg.  Teachers’ Meanings Regarding Educational Practice , 2002 .

[17]  L. A. Hausman.  How we Think , 1921 .

[18]  Youngkyun Baek,et al.  What makes teachers use technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[19]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. , 2003 .

[20]  What is the Purpose of Education , 2016 .

[21]  Michele Knobel,et al.  New Literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning , 2003 .

[22]  M. Ford.  Motivating Humans: Goals, Emotions, and Personal Agency Beliefs , 1992 .

[23]  Larry Cuban,et al.  High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox , 2001 .

[24]  Richard Badger,et al.  Lecturers' perceptions of lectures , 2004 .

[25]  Stephen G. Sheldon,et al.  Conditions for Classroom Technology Innovations , 2002, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[26]  C. Reigeluth,et al.  Creating Technology-Enhanced, Learner-Centered Classrooms , 2011 .

[27]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[28]  J. Bell.  Conducting small-scale investigations in educational management , 1984 .

[29]  Sanjaya Mishra,et al.  Research methods in the social sciences , 2005 .

[30]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Nikleia Eteokleous,et al.  Evaluating computer technology integration in a centralized school system , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[32]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[33]  L. Heidgerken.  [Case study methods]. , 1968, Sykepleien.

[34]  Deryn Watson,et al.  Pedagogy before Technology: Re-thinking the Relationship between ICT and Teaching , 2001, Education and Information Technologies.

[35]  Gene E. Hall,et al.  Change in Schools: Facilitating the Process. SUNY Series in Educational Leadership. , 1987 .

[36]  Jeong-Bae Son,et al.  Teacher development in e-learning environments , 2004 .

[37]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[38]  J. Gerring.  A case study , 2011, Technology and Society.

[39]  Alireza Jalilifar,et al.  Using Short Message Service (SMS) to teach English idioms to EFL students , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[40]  Richard M. Sorrentino,et al.  A Theory of Uncertainty Orientation , 2004 .

[41]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[42]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[43]  J. Kim.  Education reform policies and classroom teaching in South Korea , 2004 .

[44]  J. Rotter.  Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. , 1966, Psychological monographs.

[45]  Donna H. Redmann,et al.  Extent of Technology Integration in Instruction by Adult Basic Education Teachers , 2005 .

[46]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[47]  C. A. Bowers,et al.  The Paradox of Technology: What's Gained and Lost?. , 1998 .

[48]  G. Isaacs.  Lecturing practices and note-taking purposes , 1994 .

[49]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[50]  S. Thompson.  Social Learning Theory , 2008 .

[51]  Stephen Stoynoff.  Case Studies in TESOL Practice , 2004 .

[52]  Richard F. Schmid,et al.  The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: A meta-analysis of classroom applications , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[53]  John Monks,et al.  Bad science. , 1997, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[54]  Trudie Aberdeen.  Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. , 2013, The Canadian Journal of Action Research.

[55]  Ursula Stickler,et al.  New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online , 2005 .

[56]  P. Twining.  Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom , 2002 .

[57]  Seung H. Kim,et al.  The Digital Divide in Students' Usage of Technology Tools: A Multilevel Analysis of the Role of Teacher Practices and Classroom Characteristics , 2005 .

[58]  R. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed. , 2009 .

[59]  Thomas E. Webster.  Doing 'what works': a substantive grounded theory of teacher perceptions and uses of technology in a Korean university general English department , 2011 .

[60]  Roy J. Creek,et al.  A Descriptive Study of Experienced and Novice Teachers’ Interactive Instructional Thoughts and Actions , 1983 .

[61]  Harry F. Wolcott,et al.  Writing Up Qualitative Research , 1990 .

[62]  Leonard J Shedletsky,et al.  The paradoxes of online academic work , 2001 .

[63]  L. Connelly.  Grounded theory. , 2013, Medsurg nursing : official journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses.

[64]  Joshua Bagaka,et al.  The role of teacher practices and classroom characteristics on the "digital divide" in students’ usage of technology tools: A Multilevel Analysis , 2005 .

[65]  B. Glaser.  Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[66]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[67]  E. Skaalvik,et al.  Dimensions of Teacher Self-Efficacy and Relations with Strain Factors, Perceived Collective Teacher Efficacy, and Teacher Burnout. , 2007 .

[68]  Sara Hennessy,et al.  Developing a typology of teacher beliefs and practices concerning classroom use of ICT , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[69]  Christina Goulding,et al.  Grounded theory , 2015 .

[70]  Chih-Kai Chang,et al.  A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[71]  Adrian Kirkwood,et al.  Missing: evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education , 2013 .

[72]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .