Competition and tree crowns: a neighborhood analysis of three boreal tree species.

Competition for canopy space is a fundamental structuring feature of forest ecosystems and remains an enduring focus of research attention. We used a spatial neighborhood approach to quantify the influence of local competition on the size of individual tree crowns in north-central British Columbia, where forests are dominated by subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa), lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and interior spruce (Picea glaucaengelmanii). Using maximum likelihood methods, we quantified crown radius and length as functions of tree size and competition, estimated by the species identity and spatial arrangement of neighboring trees. Tree crown size depended on tree bole size in all species. Given low levels of competition, pine displayed the widest, shortest tree crowns compared to the relatively long and narrow crowns found in spruce and fir. Sensitivity to crowding by neighbors declined with increasing tree height in all but the pine crown radius model. Five of the six selected best models included separate competition coefficients for each neighboring tree species, evidence that species generally differ in their competitive effects on neighboring tree crowns. The selected crown radius model for lodgepole pine, a shade-intolerant species, treated all neighbors as equivalent competitors. In all species, competition from neighbors exerted an important influence on crown size. Per-capita effects of competition across different sizes and species of neighbors and target trees varied, but subalpine fir generally displayed the strongest competitive effects on neighbors. Results from this study provide evidence that species differ both in their response to competition and in their competitive influence on neighbors, factors that may contribute to maintaining coexistence.

[1]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  A Neighborhood Model of Annual‐Plant Interference , 1982 .

[2]  Jerry F. Franklin,et al.  Creating a forestry for the 21st century : the science of ecosystem management , 1997 .

[3]  Michael J. Papaik,et al.  Neighborhood analyses of canopy tree competition along environmental gradients in New England forests. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[4]  Gregory S. Biging,et al.  Modeling conifer tree crown radius and estimating canopy cover , 2000 .

[5]  G. Berntson,et al.  Competition and growth form in a woodland annual , 1990 .

[6]  I. Bella,et al.  A New Competition Model for Individual Trees , 1971 .

[7]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Tree canopy displacement and neighborhood interactions , 2003 .

[8]  T. Kuuluvainen Forest Management and Biodiversity Conservation Based on Natural Ecosystem Dynamics in Northern Europe: The Complexity Challenge , 2009, Ambio.

[9]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Neighbourhood interference amongst Pinus rigida individuals , 1984 .

[10]  Koichi Takahashi Plastic Response of Crown Architecture to Crowding in Understorey Trees of Two Co-dominating Conifers , 1996 .

[11]  D. Meidinger,et al.  Ecosystems of British Columbia , 1991 .

[12]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Competition and Allometry in Three Species of Annual Plants , 1992 .

[13]  J. Dushoff,et al.  SCALING FROM TREES TO FORESTS: TRACTABLE MACROSCOPIC EQUATIONS FOR FOREST DYNAMICS , 2008 .

[14]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[15]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements : Estimation, error analysis and dynamics , 1996 .

[16]  C. Canham,et al.  Measurement and modeling of spatially explicit variation in light transmission through interior cedar-hemlock forests of British Columbia , 1999 .

[17]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Growth Variation in a Naturally Established Population of Pinus Sylvestris , 1994 .

[18]  William H. Press,et al.  The Art of Scientific Computing Second Edition , 1998 .

[19]  M. Uriarte,et al.  Analysis of neighborhood dynamics of forest ecosystems using likelihood methods and modeling. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[20]  Alain Leduc,et al.  Stand-landscape integration in natural disturbance-based management of the southern boreal forest , 2002 .

[21]  Klaus J. Puettmann,et al.  A Critique of Silviculture: Managing for Complexity , 2008 .

[22]  L. Firbank,et al.  A neighbourhood approach to self-thinning , 1983, Oecologia.

[23]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  A neighborhood view of interactions among individual plants , 2000 .

[24]  R. Astrup Modeling growth of understory aspen and spruce in western boreal Canada , 2006 .

[25]  J. N. Long,et al.  Analysis of stand density effects on canopy structure: a conceptual approach , 1991, Trees.

[26]  Richard Law,et al.  Spatio‐temporal development of forests – current trends in field methods and models , 2004 .

[27]  J. Caspersen,et al.  Tree mortality following partial harvests is determined by skidding proximity. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[28]  Jürgen Bauhus,et al.  Silviculture for old-growth attributes , 2009 .

[29]  G. Vincent,et al.  Exploring ecological significance of tree crown plasticity through three-dimensional modelling. , 2007, Annals of botany.

[30]  A. Pommerening,et al.  The contribution of structural indices to the modelling of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) and birch (Betula spp.) crowns , 2008 .

[31]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  Towards sustainable management of the boreal forest. , 2003 .

[32]  Rüdiger Grote,et al.  Estimation of crown radii and crown projection area from stem size and tree position , 2003 .

[33]  James Rosindell,et al.  Unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[34]  Drew W. Purves,et al.  Crown Plasticity and Competition for Canopy Space: A New Spatially Implicit Model Parameterized for 250 North American Tree Species , 2007, PloS one.

[35]  S. Hubbell,et al.  A spatially explicit model of sapling growth in a tropical forest: does the identity of neighbours matter? , 2004 .

[36]  Michael J. Papaik,et al.  Multi-model analysis of tree competition along environmental gradients in southern New England forests. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[37]  C. Canham,et al.  Above‐ versus below‐ground competitive effects and responses of a guild of temperate tree species , 2009 .

[38]  David R. Miller Forest stand dynamics , 1997 .

[39]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[40]  Charles D. Canham,et al.  Species variability in growth response to light across climatic regions in northwestern British Columbia , 1998 .

[41]  C. Canham,et al.  A neighborhood analysis of canopy tree competition : effects of shading versus crowding , 2004 .

[42]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity , 2000 .

[43]  R. Freckleton,et al.  The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data , 1999 .

[44]  Jacob Weiner,et al.  Including competitive asymmetry in measures of local interference in plant populations , 1989, Oecologia.

[45]  J. Harper Population Biology of Plants , 1979 .

[46]  Craig G. Lorimer,et al.  Tests of age-independent competition indices for individual trees in natural hardwood stands , 1983 .

[47]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Diameter, Height, Crown, and Age Relationship in Eight Neotropical Tree Species , 1995 .

[48]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  A NEIGHBORHOOD ANALYSIS OF TREE GROWTH AND SURVIVAL IN A HURRICANE‐DRIVEN TROPICAL FOREST , 2004 .

[49]  K. Coates,et al.  Models of sapling mortality as a function of growth to characterize interspecific variation in shade tolerance of eight tree species of northwestern British Columbia , 1997 .

[50]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .