Learning Design through the Lens of Service: A Qualitative Study

Twenty-four senior-level capstone engineering design projects were completed at a large, public, primarily undergraduate university involving 85 students (70 male and 15 female). All projects involved the design of equipment to facilitate physical activity for people with disabilities. The effects on: i) learning design, ii) attitude towards people with disabilities, iii) motivation to complete team design projects and iv) interdisciplinary collaboration were analyzed through 24 one-hour focus groups. We explored the student experience using a constructivist approach and grounded theory. Four major themes (with associated sub-themes) emerged from our data analysis: learning design (project management, iterative design process, and user-centered design), motivation to complete design (engineering, disabilities, user), perceptions of people with disabilities (previous experience, changed attitudes and beliefs), and multidisciplinary collaboration (etiquette presentation, communication between disciplines, defining roles and expectations). Students completing these projects were shown to appreciate user-centered design, exhibit greater motivation when able to meet and develop a relationship with their client in person, discuss altruistic factors regarding their capstone experience, and were able to develop strong multidisciplinary skills.

[1]  Cheryl Campanella Bracken,et al.  Practical Resources for Assessing and Reporting Intercoder Reliability in Content Analysis Research Projects , 2005 .

[2]  G. Gilmore Needs And Capacity Assessment Strategies For Health Education And Health Promotion , 1989 .

[3]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[4]  R. Mcdermott,et al.  Health Education Evaluation and Measurement: A Practitioner's Perspective , 1993 .

[5]  E. Douglas,et al.  State of Qualitative Research in Engineering Education: Meta‐Analysis of JEE Articles, 2005–2006 , 2008 .

[6]  Spencer P. Magleby,et al.  Designing a Senior Capstone Course to Satisfy Industrial Customers , 1993 .

[7]  A. Bielefeldt,et al.  Measuring The Impacts Of Project Based Service Learning , 2009 .

[8]  Stephen M. Schultz,et al.  Free-Space Optical Link as a Model Undergraduate Design Project , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[9]  Nancy J. Hayden,et al.  The Socially Responsible Engineer: Assessing Student Attitudes of Roles and Responsibilities , 2011 .

[10]  J. Bordogna,et al.  Engineering Education: Innovation Through Integration , 1993 .

[11]  Linda Ann Riley,et al.  Blurring Boundaries between Technical Communication and Engineering: Challenges of a Multidisciplinary, Client-Based Pedagogy , 2001 .

[12]  Janet Mancini Billson,et al.  Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research , 1989 .

[13]  Blake Poland,et al.  Focus group research and "the patient's view". , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[14]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[15]  Barbara M. Moskal,et al.  Qualitative Methods Used in the Assessment of Engineering Education , 2004 .

[16]  J. Harackiewicz,et al.  Motivating the Academically Unmotivated: A Critical Issue for the 21st Century , 2000 .

[17]  Martin E. Ford Social motivation: Motivational opportunities and obstacles associated with social responsibility and caring behavior in school contexts , 1996 .

[18]  D. Man,et al.  Attitudes toward people with disabilities: a comparison between health care professionals and students , 2006, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[19]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[20]  R. Tervo,et al.  Medical students' attitudes toward persons with disability: a comparative study. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  Catherine T. Amelink,et al.  Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education , 2009 .

[22]  Chris Swan,et al.  The Effects of Service-Based Learning on Metacognitive Strategies During an Engineering Design Task , 2011 .

[23]  R. Ryan,et al.  Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  Analyzing Qualitative Data , 2014 .

[25]  E. Deci,et al.  Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective , 2008 .

[26]  Spencer E. Cahill,et al.  Reconsidering the Stigma of Physical Disability: Wheelchair Use and Public Kindness , 1995 .

[27]  Frances Garven,et al.  A national survey of occupational therapy students' and physiotherapy students' attitudes to disabled people , 2007, Clinical rehabilitation.

[28]  C. Pope,et al.  Assessing quality in qualitative research , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  P. Salmon Assessing the quality of qualitative research. , 2013, Patient education and counseling.

[30]  Nathan Hotaling,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Course , 2012 .

[31]  M. Ford,et al.  Thriving With Social Purpose: An Integrative Approach to the Development of Optimal Human Functioning , 2007 .

[32]  Carolyn J. Barg,et al.  Physical Disability, Stigma, and Physical Activity in Children , 2010 .

[33]  J. Sim,et al.  Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group. , 1998, Journal of advanced nursing.

[34]  David R. Thomas,et al.  A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data , 2006 .

[35]  J. Mckenzie,et al.  Health Promotion And Education Research Methods: Using The Five Chapter Thesis/Dissertation Model , 2005 .

[36]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory: Another Look at the Quality of Academic Motivation , 2006 .

[37]  Erik Taal,et al.  Attitudes towards people with physical or intellectual disabilities: nursing students and non-nursing peers. , 2009, Journal of advanced nursing.

[38]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[39]  Denny Davis,et al.  Capstone Design Courses and Assessment: A National Study , 2004 .

[40]  I. Dey Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists , 1993 .

[41]  Chris Rogers,et al.  The benefits of model building in teaching engineering design , 2010 .

[42]  Lynne A. Slivovsky,et al.  Capstone experiences: Effects of adapted physical activity design projects on attitudes and learning , 2011, 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[43]  H. Edmunds The Focus Group Research Handbook , 1999 .

[44]  Carla B. Zoltowski,et al.  Students' Ways of Experiencing Human‐Centered Design , 2012 .

[45]  Brian Bowe,et al.  A Strategy for the Development of Lifelong Learning and Personal Skills throughout an Undergraduate Engineering Programme , 2010, 2010 IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments.

[46]  Pamela Jordan Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[47]  Larry Hirst,et al.  Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments , 2010 .

[48]  A. Assor,et al.  Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. , 2002, The British journal of educational psychology.

[49]  E. Guba,et al.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1989 .

[50]  Jeffrey Martin,et al.  Benefits and barriers to physical activity for individuals with disabilities: a social-relational model of disability perspective , 2013, Disability and rehabilitation.

[51]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation , 2000 .

[52]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[53]  William C. Oakes,et al.  2005 Bernard M. Gordon Prize Lecture * : Integrating Engineering Education and Community Service: Themes for the Future of Engineering Education , 2006 .

[54]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[55]  Bradley J. Cardinal,et al.  Motivating Individuals With Disabilities to Be Physically Active , 2002 .

[56]  Kathryn R. Wentzel,et al.  Social motivation: Frontmatter , 1996 .

[57]  Rosaline S Barbour,et al.  Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[58]  Michael J. Middleton,et al.  Turning the Kaleidoscope: What We See When Self-Regulated Learning is Viewed With a Qualitative Lens , 2002 .

[59]  Alan Bryman,et al.  Analyzing Qualitative Data , 1994 .

[60]  D. Wong Do contacts make a difference? The effects of mainstreaming on student attitudes toward people with disabilities. , 2008, Research in developmental disabilities.