Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of MTF compensation.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The investigators developed an efficient method for optimizing cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor performance for digital mammography, based on the correlation between the performance of human observers and the performance of a mathematical computer model of the human visual system. The investigators examined observer performance on soft-copy display of mammographic images that were either unprocessed or processed to compensate for modulation transfer function (MTF) deficiencies in the CRT display. The results were used to validate the human visual system model. MATERIALS AND METHODS Six radiologists viewed a series of 250 mammographic images with microcalcification clusters with different contrast levels on a CRT monitor. The images were viewed twice: once without image processing and once with processing designed to compensate for MTF deficiencies in the CRT monitor. The images were analyzed with the JNDmetrix Visual Discrimination Model, which is based on the principles of just-noticeable difference measurement and frequency-channel vision modeling. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for the human observers and compared statistically with the model observers' performance. RESULTS Both human and model performance was better overall with the MTF-compensated images, especially for microcalcifications in the midlevel contrast range. There was a very high correlation between human and model observers. CONCLUSION The use of image-processing methods to compensate for limitations in the MTF of CRT monitors can improve the detection performance of radiologists searching for microcalcifications in mammographic images, and a model based on characteristics of the human visual system can be used to predict human observer results accurately.

[1]  Steven C. Horii,et al.  Handbook of Medical Imaging, Volume 3. Display and PACS , 2000 .

[2]  Hartwig R. Blume,et al.  Filmless digital chest radiography within the radiology department , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[3]  Jeffrey Lubin,et al.  A VISUAL DISCRIMINATION MODEL FOR IMAGING SYSTEM DESIGN AND EVALUATION , 1995 .

[4]  Hans Roehrig,et al.  The Monochrome Cathode Ray Tube Display and Its Performance , 2000 .

[5]  E A Krupinski,et al.  The influence of a perceptually linearized display on observer performance and visual search. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[6]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds. IV. Figures of merit for model performance in multiple-alternative forced-choice detection tasks with correlated responses. , 2000, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  E Krupinski,et al.  Influence of film and monitor display luminance on observer performance and visual search. , 1999, Academic radiology.

[8]  J. H. Williams,et al.  Design of a Double X-ray Spectrometer , 1929 .

[9]  H H Barrett,et al.  Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[11]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  Digital images and human vision , 1993 .

[12]  Jeffrey Lubin,et al.  The use of psychophysical data and models in the analysis of display system performance , 1993 .

[13]  James O. Larimer,et al.  Evaluation of human vision models for predicting human observer performance , 1997, Medical Imaging.

[14]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[15]  Hans Roehrig,et al.  Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of display phosphor. , 2003, Academic radiology.

[16]  Richard H. Moore,et al.  Current Status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[17]  Hans Roehrig,et al.  Pulmonary nodule detection and visual search: P45 and P104 monochrome versus color monitor displays. , 2002, Academic radiology.