Block-by-block approaches for spectrum fatigue crack growth prediction

Two block-by-block approaches for improving spectrum fatigue crack growth prediction were proposed and developed in this paper from the observations and analyses of fatigue crack growth behaviours in either representative specimens or real aircraft structures under flight spectrum loading by using the quantitative fractography method. The first approach is the flight-by-flight approach that can be used to predict crack growth history curves for a tested spectrum crack growth data at different stress level for a critical location. The second approach called the effective block approach can be used to predict crack growth histories for un-tested spectra based on some previously tested spectrum crack growth data. In order to demonstrate the robustness of the block-by-block approaches for aircraft damage tolerance analysis, verification and consistency studies were conducted and presented using fatigue test results for different aircraft structures under several flight spectra. It was found that the block-by-block approaches are able to provide significant advantages over conventional fatigue lifing approaches for aircraft damage tolerance analysis.

[1]  R.J.H. Wanhill,et al.  Flight simulation and constant amplitude fatigue crack growth in aluminium-lithium sheet and plate , 1991 .

[2]  Jaap Schijve,et al.  Fatigue of Structures and Materials in the 20th Century and the State of the Art. , 2003 .

[3]  O. E. Wheeler Spectrum Loading and Crack Growth , 1972 .

[4]  Jm Barsom Fatigue Crack Growth Under Variable-Amplitude Loading in Various Bridge Steels , 1976 .

[5]  Pir M. Toor,et al.  A review of some damage tolerance design approaches for aircraft structures , 1973 .

[6]  Ömer G. Bilir The relationship between the parameters C and n of Paris' law for fatigue crack growth in a SAE 1010 steel , 1990 .

[7]  Guk-Rwang Won American Society for Testing and Materials , 1987 .

[8]  N. Goldsmith,et al.  Analysis and Interpretation of Aircraft Component Defects Using Quantitative Fractography , 1990 .

[9]  E. Wolf Fatigue crack closure under cyclic tension , 1970 .

[10]  Hans Albert Richard,et al.  Lifetime predictions for real loading situations—concepts and experimental results of fatigue crack growth , 2003 .

[11]  Lorrie Molent,et al.  Flight-by-flight fatigue crack growth life assessment , 2007 .

[12]  J. Willenborg,et al.  A Crack Growth Retardation Model Using an Effective Stress Concept , 1971 .

[13]  P. Paris A rational analytic theory of fatigue , 1961 .

[14]  D. S. Dugdale,et al.  The propagation of fatigue cracks in sheet specimens , 1958 .

[15]  Edwin H. Niccolls,et al.  A correlation for fatigue crack growth rate , 1976 .

[16]  L. Molent,et al.  Recent developments in fatigue crack growth assessment , 2006 .

[17]  K. Sadananda,et al.  Classification of fatigue crack growth behavior , 1995 .

[18]  Lorrie Molent,et al.  An experimental evaluation of fatigue crack growth , 2005 .

[19]  A. J. Green,et al.  Characterisation of equivalent initial flaw sizes in 7050 aluminium alloy , 2006 .

[20]  Observations of crack path changes caused by periodic underloads in AA7050-T7451 , 2008 .

[21]  Steve Lambert,et al.  A study of the stress ratio effects on fatigue crack growth using the unified two-parameter fatigue crack growth driving force , 2007 .

[22]  Dale L. Ball,et al.  Joint Strike Fighter Airframe Durability and Damage Tolerance Certification , 2006 .

[23]  A. Brot,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF SEVERAL RETARDATION MODELS FOR CRACK GROWTH PREDICTION UNDER SPECTRUM LOADING , 2002 .

[24]  J. C. Newman,et al.  Crack-growth calculations in 7075-T7351 aluminum alloy under various load spectra using an improved crack-closure model , 2004 .