Framework for evaluating management interventions for water-quality improvement across multiple agents

It is difficult to accurately predict the impacts of policies for control of nonpoint-source pollution because analytical frameworks incorporating agent heterogeneity are rare. This paper overcomes this limitation through describing a new framework in which the behaviour of individual firms is explicitly represented by large, complex models calibrated to baseline information. Disaggregation allows the simulation of policies that require uniform reductions in pollutant load or those that allow different rates of abatement between firms to achieve a given nutrient target at least cost, as with the trading of pollution entitlements. The reduction of nitrate leaching from intensive dairy production in a catchment of the Waikato River in New Zealand is used as an illustrative application. It is highlighted that satisfaction of water-quality standards will incur substantial costs within this region. Overall, the framework is notable for its integration of multiple modelling techniques from diverse disciplines and its focus on the behaviour of individual agents. Moreover, it can easily be applied elsewhere where sufficient information is available.

[1]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Amos Golan Information and Entropy Econometrics - A Review and Synthesis , 2008 .

[3]  Thiagarajah Ramilan,et al.  Improving Water Quality through Environmental Policies and Farm Management: an Environmental Economics Analysis of Dairy Farming in Karapiro Catchment , 2008 .

[4]  Gideon Kruseman,et al.  Bio-economic household modelling for agricultural intensification. , 2000 .

[5]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  A review of nitrogen and phosphorus export to waterways: context for catchment modelling , 2006 .

[6]  S. Ledgard,et al.  Nutrient management in New Zealand pastures— recent developments and future issues , 2007 .

[7]  M. J. Hedley,et al.  A climate‐driven, soil fertility dependent, pasture production model , 2000 .

[8]  D. Mccall,et al.  Optimized dairy grazing systems in the northeast United States and New Zealand. I. Model description and evaluation. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  Richard E. Howitt,et al.  Positive Mathematical Programming , 1995 .

[10]  J. Roche,et al.  Effect of stocking rate on pasture production, milk production, and reproduction of dairy cows in pasture-based systems. , 2008, Journal of dairy science.

[11]  Richard D. Horan,et al.  The Economics of Nonpoint Pollution Control , 2002 .

[12]  Bruno Henry de Frahan,et al.  Positive Mathematical Programming for Agricultural and Environmental Policy Analysis: Review and Practice , 2007 .

[13]  I. R. Johnson,et al.  DairyMod and EcoMod: biophysical pasture-simulation models for Australia and New Zealand , 2008 .

[14]  Eligius M. T. Hendrix,et al.  A framework to study nearly optimal solutions of linear programming models developed for agricultural land use exploration , 2000 .

[15]  Graeme J. Doole,et al.  Evaluating Input Standards for Non‐Point Pollution Control under Firm Heterogeneity , 2010 .

[16]  S. Ledgard,et al.  Nitrogen cycling in low input legume-based agriculture, with emphasis on legume/grass pastures , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[17]  C. Basset-Mens,et al.  Eco-efficiency of intensification scenarios for milk production in New Zealand , 2009 .

[18]  David Kendrick,et al.  GAMS, a user's guide , 1988, SGNM.

[19]  Hendrik Wolff,et al.  Estimation of constrained optimisation models for agricultural supply analysis based on generalised maximum entropy , 2003 .

[20]  Marcello D'Orazio,et al.  Statistical Matching: Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[21]  David J. Pannell,et al.  Flat Earth Economics: The Far-reaching Consequences of Flat Payoff Functions in Economic Decision Making , 2006 .

[22]  K. L. Johns,et al.  OVERSEER ® nutrient budgets – moving towards on-farm resource accounting , 2022 .