Real and hypothetical rewards in self-control and social discounting

Laboratory studies of choice and decision making among real monetary rewards typically use smaller real rewards than those common in real life. When laboratory rewards are large, they are almost always hypothetical. In applying laboratory results meaningfully to real-life situations, it is important to know the extent to which choices among hypothetical rewards correspond to choices among real rewards and whether variation of the magnitude of hypothetical rewards affects behavior in meaningful ways. The present study compared real and hypothetical monetary rewards in two experiments. In Experiment 1, participants played a temporal discounting game that incorporates the logic of a repeated prisoner's-dilemma (PD) game versus tit-for-tat; choice of one alternative (``defection'' in PD terminology) resulted in a small-immediate reward; choice of the other alternative (``cooperation'' in PD terminology) resulted in a larger reward delayed until the following trial. The larger-delayed reward was greater for half of the groups than for the other half. Rewards also differed in type across groups: multiples of real nickels, hypothetical nickels, or hypothetical hundred-dollar bills. All groups significantly increased choice of the larger delayed reward over the 40 trials of the experiment. Over the last 10 trials, cooperation was significantly higher when the difference between larger and smaller hypothetical rewards was greater. Reward type (real or hypothetical) made no significant difference in cooperation on most measures. In Experiment 2, real and hypothetical rewards were compared in social discounting---the decrease in value to the giver of a reward as social distance increases to the receiver of the reward. Social discount rates were well described by a hyperbolic function. Discounting rates for real and hypothetical rewards did not significantly differ. These results add to the evidence that results of experiments with hypothetical rewards validly apply in everyday life.

[1]  Howard Rachlin,et al.  Teaching and learning in a probabilistic prisoner's dilemma , 2002, Behavioural Processes.

[2]  Howard Rachlin,et al.  Altruism among relatives and non-relatives , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[3]  L. Green,et al.  Discounting of delayed rewards across the life span: age differences in individual discounting functions , 1999, Behavioural Processes.

[4]  Eric T. Olson,et al.  The Extended Self , 2011, Minds and Machines.

[5]  G. A. Hale,et al.  On Use of ANOVA in Developmental Research , 1977 .

[6]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory , 1990 .

[7]  William M. Smith,et al.  A Study of Thinking , 1956 .

[8]  Howard Rachlin,et al.  Social Discounting and Delay Discounting , 2008 .

[9]  Warren K Bickel,et al.  Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. , 2002, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  G. Badger,et al.  SOCIAL DISCOUNTING AND CIGARETTE SMOKING DURING PREGNANCY. , 2012, Journal of behavioral decision making.

[11]  G. Madden,et al.  Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards. , 2003, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[12]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment and decision making. , 2012, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[13]  A. Rapoport.  Game theory as a theory of conflict resolution , 1974 .

[14]  L. Green,et al.  Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. , 2001, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  Josef Perner,et al.  Framing decisions: Hypothetical and real , 2002 .

[16]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[18]  V. Smith,et al.  Monetary rewards and decision cost in experimental economics , 2000 .

[19]  J. E. Mazur.  An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. , 1987 .

[20]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[21]  A. Odum.  Delay discounting: Trait variable? , 2011, Behavioural Processes.

[22]  H. Rachlin,et al.  Reinforcement and punishment in the prisoner's dilemma game , 2000 .

[23]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[24]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[25]  Howard Rachlin,et al.  Delay, probability, and social discounting in a public goods game. , 2009, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[26]  Alexandra W. Logue,et al.  Independence of reinforcer amount and delay: The generalized matching law and self-control in humans , 1992 .

[27]  G. Connors,et al.  Drinking outcome expectancies among male alcoholics during relapse situations. , 1988, British journal of addiction.

[28]  H. Rachlin,et al.  Self-control and social cooperation , 1999, Behavioural Processes.

[29]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  How reinforcer type affects choice in economic games , 2007, Behavioural Processes.

[30]  Colin Camerer,et al.  The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework , 1999 .

[31]  Aaron M White,et al.  What Happened? Alcohol, Memory Blackouts, and the Brain , 2003, Alcohol research & health : the journal of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.

[32]  Colin Camerer.  Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction , 2003 .

[33]  H. Rachlin,et al.  The Temporal Dynamics of Cooperation. , 2012, Journal of behavioral decision making.

[34]  H. Rachlin,et al.  Social Discounting , 2006, Psychological science.