Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers.

The use of molecular markers to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) affecting agriculturally important traits has become a key approach in plant genetics-both for understanding the genetic basis of these traits and to help design novel plant improvement programs. In the study reported here, we mapped QTLs (and evaluated their phenotypic effects) associated with seven major traits (including grain yield) in a cross between two widely used elite maize inbred lines, B73 and Mo17, in order to explore two important phenomena in maize genetics-heterosis (hybrid vigor) and genotype-by-environment (G x E) interaction. We also compared two analytical approaches for identifying QTLs, the traditional single-marker method and the more recently described interval-mapping method. Phenotypic evaluations were made on 3168 plots (nearly 100,000 plants) grown in three states. Using 76 markers that represented 90-95% of the maize genome, both analytical methods showed virtually the same results in detecting QTLs affecting grain yield throughout the genome, except on chromosome 6. Fewer QTLs were detected for other quantitative traits measured. Whenever a QTL for grain yield was detected, the heterozygote had a higher phenotype than the respective homozygote (with only one exception) suggesting not only overdominance (or pseudooverdominance) but also that these detected QTLs play a significant role in heterosis. This conclusion was reinforced by a high correlation between grain yield and proportion of heterozygous markers. Although plant materials were grown and measured in six diverse environments (North Carolina, Iowa and Illinois) there was little evidence for G x E interaction for most QTLs.

[1]  D. Grant,et al.  Quantitative trait loci controlling resistance to gray leaf spot in maize. , 1993 .

[2]  E. Lander,et al.  Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: comparison across species, generations, and environments. , 1991, Genetics.

[3]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci using selected overlapping recombinant chromosomes, in an interspecies cross of tomato. , 1990, Genetics.

[4]  B. Weir,et al.  Molecular markers in the manipulation of quantitative characters. , 1990 .

[5]  S. Tanksley,et al.  RFLP Mapping in Plant Breeding: New Tools for an Old Science , 1989, Bio/Technology.

[6]  T. Helentjaris,et al.  Mapping RFLP loci in maize using B-A translocations. , 1989, Genetics.

[7]  E. Lander,et al.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. , 1989, Genetics.

[8]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms , 1988, Nature.

[9]  B. Burr,et al.  Gene mapping with recombinant inbreds in maize. , 1988, Genetics.

[10]  T. Helentjaris,et al.  Identification of the genomic locations of duplicate nucleotide sequences in maize by analysis of restriction fragment length polymorphisms. , 1988, Genetics.

[11]  M. Daly,et al.  MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. , 1987, Genomics.

[12]  J. Wendel,et al.  Molecular marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative trait loci in maize. II. Factors influencing yield and its component traits , 1987 .

[13]  J. Wendel,et al.  Molecular-marker-facilitated investigations of quantitative-trait loci in maize. I. Numbers, genomic distribution and types of gene action. , 1987, Genetics.

[14]  E. Lander,et al.  Construction of multilocus genetic linkage maps in humans. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  S. Tanksley,et al.  Use of naturally-occurring enzyme variation to detect and map genes controlling quantitative traits in an interspecific backcross of tomato , 1982, Heredity.

[16]  C. Cockerham,et al.  Selection Responses, Genetic‐Environmental Interactions, and Heterosis with Recurrent Selection for Yield in Maize1 , 1978 .

[17]  R. W. Allard,et al.  Implications of Genotype‐Environmental Interactions in Applied Plant Breeding1 , 1964 .

[18]  J. Thoday,et al.  Location of Polygenes , 1961, Nature.

[19]  E. Everson,et al.  The Genetics of Yield Differences Associated With Awn Barbing in the Barley Hybrid (Lion ✕ Atlas10) ✕ Atlas 1 , 1955 .

[20]  H. K. Hayes,et al.  Development of the heterosis concept. , 1952 .

[21]  K. Sax,et al.  The Association of Size Differences with Seed-Coat Pattern and Pigmentation in PHASEOLUS VULGARIS. , 1923, Genetics.