The acquiescence effect in responding to a questionnaire

Objective: Since the acquiescence effect can distort assessments, it is important to test techniques to quantify this effect. Methods: The tendency of acquiescence is tested by means of a questionnaire. 2037 representatively selected subjects filled in the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), which consists of five subscales with positively and negatively formulated items. For each subject and for each subscale an acquiescence score was calculated based on the simple sum of the answers to the items of both orientations. Results: Extreme acquiescence scores were rare (about 0.5%). All correlations between the acquiescence scores of the subscales were positive with mean values of 0.24, which indicates a certain degree of individual consistency in the acquiescence behavior. In the exploratory and confirmatory factorial analyses the polarity of the items was at least as meaningful as the contents of the subscales. Persons with high degrees of acquiescence were principally older and more depressed. By means of Rasch scaling procedures differences in threshold parameters for the response categories between positively and negatively oriented items were found. Conclusion: The acquiescence scores derived by simple addition of item values proved to be well suited to clarify amount and conditions of the acquiescence effect.

[1]  S. Messick THE PSYCHOLOGY OF ACQUIESCENCE: AN INTERPRETATION OF RESEARCH EVIDENCE1 , 1966 .

[2]  R C Aitken,et al.  Measurement of mood. , 1969, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[3]  P. Costa,et al.  Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  J. Ray Reviving the problem of acquiescent response bias. , 1983 .

[5]  G. Huston The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. , 1987, The Journal of rheumatology.

[6]  J. Krosnick Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys , 1991 .

[7]  A. Antonovsky The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. , 1993, Social science & medicine.

[8]  E. Smets,et al.  The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue. , 1995, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[9]  Application of the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  D. Watson,et al.  Measurement and mismeasurement of mood: recurrent and emergent issues. , 1997, Journal of personality assessment.

[11]  R. Schneider,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) and the Rhoten Fatigue Scale among rural cancer outpatients. , 1998, Cancer nursing.

[12]  José M. Tomás,et al.  Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale: Two Factors or Method Effects. , 1999 .

[13]  J. M. Carroll,et al.  On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  R. Corwyn,et al.  The Factor Structure of Global Self-Esteem among Adolescents and Adults ☆ , 2000 .

[15]  S. Riedel-Heller,et al.  Zur Anwendung der CES-D bei älteren Menschen: Dimensionsstruktur und Meßartefakte , 2000 .

[16]  Jaak Billiet,et al.  Modeling Acquiescence in Measurement Models for Two Balanced Sets of Items , 2000 .

[17]  Christine DiStefano,et al.  Wording Effects in Self-Esteem Scales: Methodological Artifact or Response Style? , 2003 .

[18]  P. Y. Herzberg,et al.  Zur internen Struktur des globalen Selbstwertgefühls nach Rosenberg , 2003 .