Cementing Relationships: Vertical Integration, Foreclosure, Productivity, and Prices

This paper empirically investigates the possible market power effects of vertical integration proposed in the theoretical literature on vertical foreclosure. It uses a rich data set of cement and ready‐mixed concrete plants that spans several decades to perform a detailed case study. There is little evidence that foreclosure is quantitatively important in these industries. Instead, prices fall, quantities rise, and entry rates remain unchanged when markets become more integrated. These patterns are consistent, however, with an alternative efficiency‐based mechanism. Namely, higher‐productivity producers are more likely to vertically integrate and are also larger, more likely to survive, and more likely to charge lower prices. We find evidence that integrated producers’ productivity advantage is tied to improved logistics coordination afforded by large local concrete operations. Interestingly, this benefit is not due to firms’ vertical structures per se: nonvertical firms with large local concrete operations have similarly high productivity levels.

[1]  C. Syverson Prices, Spatial Competition and Heterogeneous Producers: An Empirical Test , 2007 .

[2]  Patrick Rey,et al.  A Primer on Foreclosure , 2007 .

[3]  Justine S. Hastings,et al.  Market Power, Vertical Integration and the Wholesale Price of Gasoline , 2005 .

[4]  Chad Syverson,et al.  Reallocation, Firm Turnover, and Efficiency: Selection on Productivity or Profitability? , 2005 .

[5]  Do Vertical Mergers Facilitate Upstream Collusion? Second Version , 2005 .

[6]  J. Asker,et al.  Diagnosing Foreclosure Due to Exclusive Dealing , 2004 .

[7]  Chad Syverson,et al.  Market Structure and Productivity: A Concrete Example , 2004, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  J. Haltiwanger,et al.  NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE EFFECT OF STRUCTURAL REFORMS ON PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFITABILITY ENHANCING REALLOCATION: EVIDENCE FROM COLOMBIA , 2004 .

[9]  Joan V. Robinson,et al.  The Nature of the Firm , 2004 .

[10]  Volker Nocke,et al.  Do Vertical Mergers Facilitate Upstream Collusion? , 2003 .

[11]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  Firm-level evidence on productivity differentials and turnover in Taiwanese manufacturing , 2001 .

[12]  Justine S. Hastings,et al.  Vertical Integration in Gasoline Supply: An Empirical Test of Raising Rivals' Costs , 2001 .

[13]  Justine S. Hastings Vertical Relationships and Competition in Retail Gasoline Markets: An Empirical Evidence from Contract Changes in Southern California , 2000 .

[14]  Mark Doms,et al.  Understanding Productivity: Lessons from Longitudinal Microdata , 2000 .

[15]  Christopher T. Taylor,et al.  Vertical Relationships and Competition in Retail Gasoline Markets: Empirical Evidence from Contract Changes in Southern California: Comment , 2000 .

[16]  Christopher M. Snyder,et al.  Vertical Foreclosure in Experimental Markets , 1999 .

[17]  John Shea,et al.  Instrument Relevance in Multivariate Linear Models: A Simple Measure , 1996, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[18]  David Waterman,et al.  The effects of vertical integration between cable television systems and pay cable networks , 1996 .

[19]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  Output price, markups, and producer size , 1996 .

[20]  Michael H. Riordan,et al.  Anticompetitive Vertical Integration by a Dominant Firm , 1996 .

[21]  Sang V. Nguyen,et al.  On Productivity and Plant Ownership Change: New Evidence from the Longitudinal Research Database , 1995 .

[22]  Eric S. Rosengren,et al.  Empirical Evidence on Vertical Foreclosure , 1994 .

[23]  G. Johnes Rates of Return , 1993 .

[24]  M. Whinston,et al.  Incomplete Contracts, Vertical Integration, and Supply Assurance , 1993 .

[25]  C. Winston,et al.  Foreclosure of Railroad Markets: A Test of Chicago Leverage Theory , 1992, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[26]  G. Shaffer,et al.  Vertical Control with Bilateral Contracts , 1992 .

[27]  A. Pakes,et al.  The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry , 1992 .

[28]  Martin Neil Baily,et al.  Productivity Dynamics in Manufacturing Plants , 1992 .

[29]  J. Tirole,et al.  Vertical integration and market foreclosure , 1990 .

[30]  Larry Samuelson,et al.  The Growth and Failure of U. S. Manufacturing Plants , 1989 .

[31]  M. Salinger,et al.  Vertical Mergers and Market Foreclosure , 1988 .

[32]  Mark McBride Spatial Competition and Vertical Integration; Cement and Concrete Revisited: Reply , 1987 .

[33]  Sanford J. Grossman,et al.  The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration , 1986 .

[34]  D. Donovan Geological Survey , 1984, Nature.

[35]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Quantity Precommitment and Bertrand Competition Yield Cournot Outcomes , 1983 .

[36]  D. Nowlan,et al.  Costs and benefits. , 1980, Irish medical journal.

[37]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  Antitrust Law: An Economic Perspective , 1977 .

[38]  G. Becker Chapter Title: a Theory of Marriage a Theory of Marriage , 2022 .

[39]  Daniel A. Graham,et al.  Profitability of Monopolization by Vertical Integration , 1971, Journal of Political Economy.

[40]  Bruce T. Allen Vertical Integration and Market Foreclosure: The Case of Cement and Concrete , 1971, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[41]  O. Williamson The Vertical Integration of Production: Market Failure Considerations , 1971 .

[42]  Tjalling C. Koopmans,et al.  EFFICIENT ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES , 1949 .